Breaknorm
Sign inStart free

Product

SignalsPeopleCompaniesLocal businessesMCP and API

Plays

Post engagersTeam build-outChampion movedHiring surgeNewly fundedLookalikesAll plays

Data

Coverage by countryHiring dataJob changesEmail verificationCompanies by toolWho is hiringMarket mapsOutboundCompany profilesCompare
PricingDatasetsDocsSign in
Compare · ERP suites

Abacus VS IFS

As of 30 October 2026, IFS is named by 428 companies and Abacus by 137; Abacus skews to companies under 200 people (42% vs 25%), IFS to companies over 1,000 (41% vs 29%).

As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.

The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Abacus's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, IFS rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.

Abacus: 2–200 employees
42%
IFS: 2–200 employees
25%
Abacus: 1,000+ employees
29%
IFS: 1,000+ employees
41%
Postings per company, 90 days
3.1 · 4.1
Website or DNS footprint
403 · 0
137companies name Abacus
428companies name IFS
0name both
431 · 1,776postings in 90 days, Abacus · IFS
02Side by side

Who chooses which

Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.

By company size
SegmentAbacusshareIFSshareLeans
Self-employed21%20%even
2-10 employees118%307%even
11-50 employees2720%276%Abacus
51-200 employees1914%5112%even
201-500 employees2216%7518%even
501-1000 employees1612%6615%IFS
1001-5000 employees1511%9622%IFS
5001-10000 employees139%256%Abacus
10,001+ employees129%5613%IFS
By industry
SegmentAbacusshareIFSshareLeans
Business & finance services4029%4611%Abacus
Technology & software2216%358%Abacus
Public, community & associations129%113%Abacus
Manufacturing & industry129%17741%IFS
Property & construction118%266%even
Health care86%61%Abacus
Commerce & trade64%348%IFS
Consumer services & leisure64%123%even
Hospitality & travel54%––outside top 12
Utilities & infrastructure54%297%IFS
Media & content43%102%even
Automotive32%225%IFS
Transport, logistics & rental––164%outside top 12
By country
SegmentAbacusshareIFSshareLeans
Switzerland5439%––outside top 12
United States3022%20548%IFS
Germany1813%379%Abacus
United Kingdom139%389%even
India54%––outside top 12
Austria32%––outside top 12
Canada32%164%even
France32%276%IFS
Australia11%82%even
Czechia11%––outside top 12
Italy11%––outside top 12
LI11%––outside top 12
Poland––205%outside top 12
Sweden––174%outside top 12
Netherlands––164%outside top 12
Norway––82%outside top 12
Denmark––61%outside top 12
Belgium––51%outside top 12
Postings by team (share of each tool's postings)
SegmentAbacusshareIFSshareLeans
IT operations & business systems10319%38017%Abacus
Finance & accounting10219%22810%Abacus
Human resources397%––outside top 12
Software engineering356%22910%IFS
Data & AI214%1225%even
Sales204%793%even
Administration & office153%––outside top 12
Unclassified132%––outside top 12
Engineering (non-software)122%1085%IFS
Legal, compliance & risk112%––outside top 12
Healthcare clinical102%––outside top 12
General management & consulting92%––outside top 12
Product, program & project management––1627%outside top 12
Logistics warehouse and transport––1456%outside top 12
Quality, safety & environment––954%outside top 12
Procurement and purchasing––773%outside top 12
Skilled trades and field service––623%outside top 12
Manufacturing and production––572%outside top 12
Cite this

Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.

IFS is named by 428 companies in job postings and Abacus by 137; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/abacus-vs-ifs)
How we know

Read from the source, not self-reported

Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →

  • Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
  • Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
  • SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
  • Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
FAQ

Abacus vs IFS: questions

Which is more used, Abacus or IFS?

By companies naming it in their own job postings, IFS (428) over Abacus (137). By website-and-DNS footprint, Abacus (403 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.

Who chooses Abacus?

42% of Abacus companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 25% for IFS. 29% of Abacus companies have over 1,000 employees, against 41% for IFS.

Do companies run both?

0 companies name both in their postings, usually Abacus in marketing and IFS in sales, or during a migration.

Where do these numbers come from?

From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.

Companies and people

Get either list your way

The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.

Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it

Filter on Abacus or IFS. Start free, no card.

  1. 01Sign up, no card
  2. 02Connect Claude, ChatGPT or an API key
  3. 03Ask for your market