EngagementPlay · Intermediate

People engaging with posts in your space

Who liked or commented on a competitor's or creator's posts this week. A step-by-step playbook: what the signal means, whom to write to, what to say and how to measure it.

The post engagers play in two minutes · Read the transcript
For

Teams in a category where competitors, founders or creators post regularly on LinkedIn.

Level

IntermediateOne timing signal

Setup

20 minutes, then weekly

Data

People · Signals

How do you turn people who engage with LinkedIn posts into leads?

Pick a few posts or profiles in your category, such as a competitor's founder or a well-known creator, and collect who likes and comments each week. Keep the people whose role and company fit, find a verified email, and write about the topic they engaged with, never about the fact that they engaged. The topic tells you what is on their mind this week.

Why

Why does the post engagers play work?

What someone reacts to says what they are thinking about this week. That is rarely visible anywhere else.

It shows current interest

A comment on a post about routing problems says routing is on their mind now, not in general.

The topic is your opener

You don't have to guess what to write about. The post already chose the subject.

Senior engagers are rarely on lists

Directors who comment are often missing from cold lists, or listed with an old title.

You choose the audience

By picking which posts to track, you pick the problem the audience has. Track posts about the problem you solve.

Signal

What counts as a useful engager?

All of these:

  • A like or comment on a post you track, within the last 7 days.
  • Comments count more than likes: they took time to write.
  • A role you sell to, at a level that decides or influences.
  • A company that fits your market.

What looks like the signal but is not

Vendors and creators
Many engagers sell to the same audience you do. Filter out competitors, agencies and other creators.
Job seekers and students
Popular posts attract people looking for work. Filter on current role and company.
Friends of the poster
Colleagues and friends like everything their contact posts. People who like every post from one person are rarely buyers.
Engagement groups
Some posts are boosted by groups who like each other's content. The same names on every post, early, are the sign.
How

How to run it, step by step

Six steps in the same five-part frame as every play. Each step says what you are after, why it matters and how to do it with any tools; the Breaknorm boxes show the shortcut.

  1. 01Signal

    Pick posts and profiles to track

    Goal. A few sources whose audience has the problem you solve.

    Why. The posts decide who shows up. Track a creator who writes about your problem and you get buyers; track one who writes about everything and you get an audience.

    How.
    • Choose two to five profiles that post about the problem you solve: a competitor's founder, a category creator, an analyst.
    • Add your own company's posts; your own engagers are the warmest.
    • Prefer posts about problems over posts about announcements.
    Track profilestrack_posts
    { "track": { "profiles": ["linkedin.com/in/routivo-founder"], "window_days": 7 } }

    You end withA tracked set of profiles, with engagers collected as they appear.

  2. 02Signal

    Collect and sort the engagers

    Goal. Everyone who engaged this week, with comments ranked above likes.

    Why. A comment is a stronger signal than a like, and recent beats old. Sorting first means you write to the best people first.

    How.
    • Collect likes and comments from the last 7 days.
    • Rank comments above likes.
    • Note the topic of the post next to each person.

    You end withA weekly list of engagers, with the post and the topic for each.

  3. 03Who

    Keep the people who can buy

    Goal. Only engagers with the right role at a company that fits.

    Why. Most engagers are not buyers. Filtering on role, level and company is what turns an audience into a list.

    How.
    • Match each person to their current role and company.
    • Keep the functions and levels you sell to.
    • Drop vendors, competitors, job seekers and the poster's colleagues.
    Filter by role and companysearch_people
    { "people": { "level": ["director", "vp", "head", "c_level"] }, "company": { "employees": { "min": 20 } } }

    You end withA short list of people worth writing to.

  4. 04Find

    Get an email that is verified

    Goal. A working work address for each person.

    Why. Replying in the comments or by DM mixes the public and the personal. A verified work email keeps it professional.

    How.
    • Find the address from the name and the company domain.
    • Verify it at the mail server.
    • Hold people whose address cannot be confirmed.
    Find and verify with Breaknormfind_email · verify_email
    find_email({ "name": "Tom Becker", "domain": "parcelyn.com" })

    You end withA verified email per person.

  5. 05Say

    Write about the topic, not the like

    Goal. A message about the problem they were reading about, with something useful on it.

    Why. "I saw you liked a post" feels like being watched. A note about the same problem, with something useful, feels like a coincidence worth answering.

    How.
    • Open on the topic of the post, not on their activity.
    • Add what you know about that problem at a company like theirs.
    • Offer something useful on that topic and ask if you can send it.

    You end withOne message per person, built on the topic.

  6. 06Measure

    Compare sources and topics

    Goal. A view of which posts and topics bring people who reply.

    Why. Some sources bring buyers, others bring an audience. Without tracking by source you keep watching the wrong posts.

    How.
    • Tag each person with the profile and the topic they engaged with.
    • Compare replies by source and topic.
    • Drop the sources that bring no replies, and add new ones each month.

    You end withA ranked list of sources and topics.

Example

A worked example, start to finish

One person, through every step. The people and companies are invented; the steps are the real ones.

  1. Signal

    You track Routivo's founder, who writes about route planning. This week's post: "Why routing breaks at 50 vans".

  2. Signal

    Tom Becker commented on it on October 19.

  3. Who

    Tom is Director of Operations at Parcelyn, about 120 people. Role and company both fit.

  4. Find

    [email protected] comes back valid from the mail server.

  5. Say

    The message is about routing at that fleet size, not about his comment, and offers a checklist.

  6. Measure

    Tagged with the source and the topic, so you can see which posts bring replies.

Prompt

Who engaged with Routivo's founder's posts this week? Only directors and up.

Commented on a post
Director · Ops
Engaged
Post"Why routing breaks at 50 vans"
DidCommented, Oct 19
Email[email protected] · valid
63 peoplethis week · example
ILLUSTRATIVE · EXAMPLE DATA
Say

What to write to someone who engaged with a post

A short email that gives before it asks: something useful for the situation they are in, not a meeting request. Why each line is there:

SubjectRouting past 50 vans

Hi Tom, a lot of operations leads are talking about what breaks in route planning once a fleet passes about 50 vans.

The usual cause is rules set by hand for a smaller fleet: every new driver adds an exception, until dispatch is planning on spreadsheets again.

We wrote a short checklist for re-planning routes at that size: which rules to automate first and which to leave to dispatchers.

Can I send it over?

Pitfalls

When not to run this play

  • You open with "I saw you liked…" or "I saw your comment…".
  • The posts you track are not about the problem you solve.
  • You write to everyone who engaged; most of them are not buyers.
  • You repeat the post's content back to them.
  • The engager works at a competitor or at the poster's company.
Measure

How to measure whether it works

Track a few numbers per batch and compare them over time. What counts as good depends on your market, so the trend matters more than any benchmark.

Reply rate by source
Which profiles bring people who answer.
Reply rate by topic
Which problems get replies. Use it to choose what to track next.
Comments compared with likes
Commenters should reply more often. If they don't, the topic may be wrong.
Yes rate to the offer
How many say yes to what you offered.
Data

From our data

Figures from Breaknorm's own engagement data, refreshed every 1 to 7 days.

—

Median engagers per tracked post per week

Live figure from our data, to be added before launch.
—

Share of engagers at director level and above

Live figure from our data, to be added before launch.
—

Share of engagers with a verified work email

Live figure from our data, to be added before launch.
Recap

Checklist

  1. Two to five sources that post about your problem
  2. Engagers from the last 7 days, comments ranked first
  3. Role, level and company match your market
  4. Vendors, job seekers and the poster's colleagues removed
  5. Email verified at the mail server
  6. Message opens on the topic, never on the like
  7. Offer of something useful on that topic
  8. Replies tracked by source and topic
FAQ

Questions about this play

Is it OK to contact people who liked a LinkedIn post?

Write to their work email about the topic, not about their activity, and make it easy to opt out. Most people find "I saw you liked" intrusive, so leave it out. Check what your local rules require.

Which posts should I track?

Posts about the problem you solve, from people your buyers follow: a competitor's founder, a category creator, an analyst, and your own company. Posts about problems bring better engagers than announcements.

Are comments better than likes?

Yes. A comment takes effort and says more about what the person thinks. Rank commenters first and treat likes as a weaker signal.

How fresh does the engagement need to be?

Within a week. The point is what is on their mind now; after a few weeks the topic has moved on.

Can I run this play without Breaknorm?

Yes. Open the post, read the reactions and comments, and look each person up. It works for a post or two a week; collecting, filtering and finding verified emails for every engager is what a data API does for you.

Video transcript: The post engagers play in two minutes

What someone reacts to says what they are thinking about this week. That is rarely visible anywhere else.

Pick a few posts or profiles about the problem you solve: a competitor's founder, a category creator, your own company. Collect who likes and comments every week.

Keep the people whose role and company fit, and drop vendors, job seekers and the poster's friends. Then find a verified email.

Write about the topic, never about the like. Offer something useful on that topic, and ask if you can send it.

Run it

Run it with Breaknorm

Steps one to four in one prompt, from any agent with the Breaknorm MCP server connected. Writing the message and measuring the replies stay yours.

Who engaged with Routivo's founder's posts this week? Only directors and up.
{
  "track": { "profiles": ["linkedin.com/in/routivo-founder"], "window_days": 7 },
  "people": { "level": ["director", "vp", "head", "c_level"] },
  "company": { "employees": { "min": 20 } }
}
Run the whole play from your agent

Add the skill to Claude or ChatGPT, connect Breaknorm, and ask for the play by name.

Download the skill
Related

Plays that pair with this one

Run post engagers
on your market

Connect the MCP server, paste the prompt, and get 1,000 records free.

  1. 01Sign up, no card
  2. 02Connect Claude, ChatGPT or an API key
  3. 03Ask for your market, 1,000 records free