Abaqus VS Aspen HYSYS
As of 30 October 2026, Aspen HYSYS is named by 186 companies and Abaqus by 403; Abaqus skews to companies under 200 people (36% vs 32%), Aspen HYSYS to companies over 1,000 (43% vs 44%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Abaqus's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Aspen HYSYS rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- Abaqus: 2–200 employees
- 36%
- Aspen HYSYS: 2–200 employees
- 32%
- Abaqus: 1,000+ employees
- 44%
- Aspen HYSYS: 1,000+ employees
- 43%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 3.4 · 2.3
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | Abaqus | share | Aspen HYSYS | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 4 | 1% | 3 | 2% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 39 | 10% | 13 | 7% | Abaqus |
| 11-50 employees | 38 | 9% | 21 | 11% | even |
| 51-200 employees | 69 | 17% | 26 | 14% | Abaqus |
| 201-500 employees | 49 | 12% | 29 | 16% | Aspen HYSYS |
| 501-1000 employees | 26 | 6% | 14 | 8% | even |
| 1001-5000 employees | 60 | 15% | 36 | 19% | Aspen HYSYS |
| 5001-10000 employees | 22 | 5% | 10 | 5% | even |
| 10,001+ employees | 96 | 24% | 34 | 18% | Abaqus |
| Segment | Abaqus | share | Aspen HYSYS | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturing & industry | 168 | 42% | 48 | 26% | Abaqus |
| Business & finance services | 82 | 20% | 65 | 35% | Aspen HYSYS |
| Technology & software | 42 | 10% | 11 | 6% | Abaqus |
| Automotive | 34 | 8% | 2 | 1% | Abaqus |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 26 | 6% | 39 | 21% | Aspen HYSYS |
| Public, community & associations | 14 | 3% | 1 | 1% | Abaqus |
| Property & construction | 13 | 3% | 8 | 4% | even |
| Consumer services & leisure | 8 | 2% | 6 | 3% | even |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 8 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Media & content | 5 | 1% | 3 | 2% | even |
| Commerce & trade | 3 | 1% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Agriculture & forestry | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Health care | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Abaqus | share | Aspen HYSYS | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 240 | 60% | 110 | 59% | even |
| France | 36 | 9% | 11 | 6% | Abaqus |
| United Kingdom | 24 | 6% | 12 | 6% | even |
| Germany | 21 | 5% | 5 | 3% | Abaqus |
| Spain | 12 | 3% | 4 | 2% | even |
| India | 7 | 2% | 9 | 5% | Aspen HYSYS |
| Austria | 5 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Canada | 5 | 1% | 11 | 6% | Aspen HYSYS |
| Sweden | 5 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Australia | 4 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Italy | 4 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| United Arab Emirates | 3 | 1% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Norway | – | – | 4 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Brazil | – | – | 3 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| ID | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| NG | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Abaqus | share | Aspen HYSYS | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Engineering (non-software) | 1,304 | 76% | 467 | 77% | even |
| Research and science | 45 | 3% | 10 | 2% | even |
| Data & AI | 23 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Software engineering | 20 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Product, program & project management | 10 | 1% | 11 | 2% | even |
| Sales | 10 | 1% | 6 | 1% | even |
| Design & UX | 8 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| IT operations & business systems | 8 | 0% | 2 | 0% | even |
| Quality, safety & environment | 6 | 0% | 11 | 2% | even |
| Education & training | 3 | 0% | 5 | 1% | even |
| Construction and civil | 2 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Customer service & success | 2 | 0% | 5 | 1% | even |
| General management & consulting | – | – | 7 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Manufacturing and production | – | – | 4 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Unclassified | – | – | 2 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Administration & office | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using Abaqus →
Companies using Aspen HYSYS →
cae simulation ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
Aspen HYSYS is named by 186 companies in job postings and Abaqus by 403; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/abaqus-vs-aspen-hysys)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
Abaqus vs Aspen HYSYS: questions
Which is more used, Abaqus or Aspen HYSYS?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, Abaqus (403) over Aspen HYSYS (186). By website-and-DNS footprint, Aspen HYSYS (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses Abaqus?
36% of Abaqus companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 32% for Aspen HYSYS. 44% of Abaqus companies have over 1,000 employees, against 43% for Aspen HYSYS.
Do companies run both?
0 companies name both in their postings, usually Abaqus in marketing and Aspen HYSYS in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on Abaqus or Aspen HYSYS. Start free, no card.