ACL Analytics VS Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE
As of 5 November 2026, Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE is named by 349 companies and ACL Analytics by 367; ACL Analytics skews to companies under 200 people (22% vs 9%), Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE to companies over 1,000 (75% vs 56%).
As of 5 November 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: ACL Analytics's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- ACL Analytics: 2–200 employees
- 22%
- Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE: 2–200 employees
- 9%
- ACL Analytics: 1,000+ employees
- 56%
- Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE: 1,000+ employees
- 75%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 2.0 · 3.2
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | ACL Analytics | share | Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 15 | 4% | 3 | 1% | ACL Analytics |
| 2-10 employees | 26 | 7% | 4 | 1% | ACL Analytics |
| 11-50 employees | 24 | 7% | 5 | 1% | ACL Analytics |
| 51-200 employees | 32 | 9% | 24 | 7% | even |
| 201-500 employees | 31 | 8% | 27 | 8% | even |
| 501-1000 employees | 34 | 9% | 24 | 7% | ACL Analytics |
| 1001-5000 employees | 82 | 22% | 101 | 29% | Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE |
| 5001-10000 employees | 42 | 11% | 48 | 14% | Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE |
| 10,001+ employees | 81 | 22% | 113 | 32% | Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE |
| Segment | ACL Analytics | share | Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business & finance services | 133 | 36% | 88 | 25% | ACL Analytics |
| Technology & software | 91 | 25% | 29 | 8% | ACL Analytics |
| Manufacturing & industry | 39 | 11% | 99 | 28% | Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE |
| Health care | 24 | 7% | 23 | 7% | even |
| Commerce & trade | 17 | 5% | 18 | 5% | even |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 15 | 4% | 30 | 9% | Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE |
| Media & content | 13 | 4% | 9 | 3% | even |
| Consumer services & leisure | 11 | 3% | 8 | 2% | even |
| Public, community & associations | 9 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 7 | 2% | 7 | 2% | even |
| Hospitality & travel | 4 | 1% | 6 | 2% | even |
| Automotive | 3 | 1% | 15 | 4% | Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE |
| Property & construction | – | – | 11 | 3% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | ACL Analytics | share | Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 208 | 57% | 276 | 79% | Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE |
| Canada | 22 | 6% | 9 | 3% | ACL Analytics |
| United Kingdom | 13 | 4% | 20 | 6% | Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE |
| Germany | 11 | 3% | 3 | 1% | ACL Analytics |
| France | 11 | 3% | 2 | 1% | ACL Analytics |
| Brazil | 9 | 2% | 2 | 1% | even |
| India | 8 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Spain | 6 | 2% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Singapore | 6 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| South Korea | 4 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| United Arab Emirates | 3 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Poland | 3 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Australia | – | – | 6 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Sweden | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Colombia | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Czechia | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| HK | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | ACL Analytics | share | Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Finance & accounting | 328 | 31% | 603 | 45% | Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE |
| Data & AI | 208 | 20% | 15 | 1% | ACL Analytics |
| IT operations & business systems | 137 | 13% | 63 | 5% | ACL Analytics |
| Legal, compliance & risk | 101 | 9% | 24 | 2% | ACL Analytics |
| Software engineering | 69 | 6% | 21 | 2% | ACL Analytics |
| Sales | 26 | 2% | 44 | 3% | even |
| Healthcare clinical | 19 | 2% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Education & training | 13 | 1% | 23 | 2% | even |
| Social care and community | 9 | 1% | 60 | 5% | Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE |
| Research and science | 7 | 1% | 10 | 1% | even |
| Engineering (non-software) | 5 | 0% | 24 | 2% | even |
| Logistics warehouse and transport | 5 | 0% | 14 | 1% | even |
| Product, program & project management | 5 | 0% | 61 | 5% | Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE |
| Customer service & success | 4 | 0% | 17 | 1% | even |
| Human resources | 4 | 0% | 4 | 0% | even |
| General management & consulting | 3 | 0% | 8 | 1% | even |
| Administration & office | 2 | 0% | 20 | 2% | even |
| Healthcare support and caregiving | 2 | 0% | 39 | 3% | Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE |
| Procurement and purchasing | 2 | 0% | 7 | 1% | even |
| Quality, safety & environment | 2 | 0% | 22 | 2% | even |
| Unclassified | 2 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Skilled trades and field service | – | – | 19 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Marketing & communications | – | – | 7 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Business development & strategy | – | – | 6 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Arts media and entertainment | – | – | 3 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Facilities cleaning and security | – | – | 3 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Manufacturing and production | – | – | 3 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Hospitality and food service | – | – | 2 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using ACL Analytics →
Companies using Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE →
tax audit tools ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE is named by 349 companies in job postings and ACL Analytics by 367; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 5 November 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/acl-analytics-vs-thomson-reuters-onesource)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
ACL Analytics vs Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE: questions
Which is more used, ACL Analytics or Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, ACL Analytics (367) over Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE (349). By website-and-DNS footprint, Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses ACL Analytics?
22% of ACL Analytics companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 9% for Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE. 56% of ACL Analytics companies have over 1,000 employees, against 75% for Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE.
Do companies run both?
0 companies name both in their postings, usually ACL Analytics in marketing and Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on ACL Analytics or Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE. Start free, no card.