Aconex VS HCSS HeavyJob
As of 30 October 2026, HCSS HeavyJob is named by 110 companies and Aconex by 239; Aconex skews to companies under 200 people (32% vs 36%), HCSS HeavyJob to companies over 1,000 (16% vs 42%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Aconex's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, HCSS HeavyJob rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- Aconex: 2–200 employees
- 32%
- HCSS HeavyJob: 2–200 employees
- 36%
- Aconex: 1,000+ employees
- 42%
- HCSS HeavyJob: 1,000+ employees
- 16%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 3.6 · 2.9
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | Aconex | share | HCSS HeavyJob | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| 2-10 employees | 9 | 4% | 3 | 3% | even |
| 11-50 employees | 23 | 10% | 6 | 5% | Aconex |
| 51-200 employees | 45 | 19% | 31 | 28% | HCSS HeavyJob |
| 201-500 employees | 31 | 13% | 30 | 27% | HCSS HeavyJob |
| 501-1000 employees | 29 | 12% | 22 | 20% | HCSS HeavyJob |
| 1001-5000 employees | 37 | 15% | 11 | 10% | Aconex |
| 5001-10000 employees | 21 | 9% | 4 | 4% | Aconex |
| 10,001+ employees | 43 | 18% | 3 | 3% | Aconex |
| Segment | Aconex | share | HCSS HeavyJob | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business & finance services | 80 | 33% | 8 | 7% | Aconex |
| Property & construction | 72 | 30% | 91 | 83% | HCSS HeavyJob |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 26 | 11% | 2 | 2% | Aconex |
| Manufacturing & industry | 24 | 10% | 4 | 4% | Aconex |
| Technology & software | 15 | 6% | 1 | 1% | Aconex |
| Media & content | 6 | 3% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 6 | 3% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Commerce & trade | 4 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Consumer services & leisure | 4 | 2% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Automotive | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Public, community & associations | 1 | 0% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Segment | Aconex | share | HCSS HeavyJob | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 101 | 42% | 96 | 87% | HCSS HeavyJob |
| United Kingdom | 39 | 16% | 2 | 2% | Aconex |
| Australia | 23 | 10% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Canada | 11 | 5% | 9 | 8% | HCSS HeavyJob |
| France | 11 | 5% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| United Arab Emirates | 9 | 4% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Germany | 6 | 3% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Spain | 6 | 3% | 2 | 2% | even |
| Ireland | 5 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| India | 5 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Austria | 4 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Saudi Arabia | 4 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Netherlands | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Aconex | share | HCSS HeavyJob | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Administration & office | 358 | 34% | 2 | 0% | Aconex |
| Engineering (non-software) | 182 | 17% | 79 | 19% | HCSS HeavyJob |
| Product, program & project management | 105 | 10% | 53 | 13% | HCSS HeavyJob |
| Construction and civil | 72 | 7% | 229 | 56% | HCSS HeavyJob |
| Quality, safety & environment | 54 | 5% | 3 | 1% | Aconex |
| Legal, compliance & risk | 29 | 3% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| IT operations & business systems | 14 | 1% | 2 | 0% | even |
| Procurement and purchasing | 12 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Data & AI | 11 | 1% | 1 | 0% | even |
| General management & consulting | 9 | 1% | 2 | 0% | even |
| Skilled trades and field service | 6 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Finance & accounting | 5 | 0% | 10 | 2% | even |
| Manufacturing and production | – | – | 3 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Human resources | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Sales | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using Aconex →
Companies using HCSS HeavyJob →
construction management ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
HCSS HeavyJob is named by 110 companies in job postings and Aconex by 239; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/aconex-vs-hcss-heavyjob)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
Aconex vs HCSS HeavyJob: questions
Which is more used, Aconex or HCSS HeavyJob?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, Aconex (239) over HCSS HeavyJob (110). By website-and-DNS footprint, HCSS HeavyJob (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses Aconex?
32% of Aconex companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 36% for HCSS HeavyJob. 42% of Aconex companies have over 1,000 employees, against 16% for HCSS HeavyJob.
Do companies run both?
0 companies name both in their postings, usually Aconex in marketing and HCSS HeavyJob in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on Aconex or HCSS HeavyJob. Start free, no card.