AFAS VS Sage 100
As of 30 October 2026, Sage 100 is named by 152 companies and AFAS by 270; AFAS skews to companies under 200 people (47% vs 60%), Sage 100 to companies over 1,000 (10% vs 26%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: AFAS's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Sage 100 rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- AFAS: 2–200 employees
- 47%
- Sage 100: 2–200 employees
- 60%
- AFAS: 1,000+ employees
- 26%
- Sage 100: 1,000+ employees
- 10%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 2.0 · 1.7
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | AFAS | share | Sage 100 | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-10 employees | 10 | 4% | 10 | 7% | Sage 100 |
| 11-50 employees | 53 | 20% | 33 | 22% | Sage 100 |
| 51-200 employees | 64 | 24% | 48 | 32% | Sage 100 |
| 201-500 employees | 42 | 16% | 35 | 23% | Sage 100 |
| 501-1000 employees | 30 | 11% | 11 | 7% | AFAS |
| 1001-5000 employees | 47 | 17% | 9 | 6% | AFAS |
| 5001-10000 employees | 6 | 2% | 1 | 1% | even |
| 10,001+ employees | 18 | 7% | 5 | 3% | AFAS |
| Segment | AFAS | share | Sage 100 | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business & finance services | 51 | 19% | 19 | 13% | AFAS |
| Health care | 38 | 14% | 7 | 5% | AFAS |
| Property & construction | 28 | 10% | 21 | 14% | Sage 100 |
| Manufacturing & industry | 26 | 10% | 49 | 32% | Sage 100 |
| Technology & software | 25 | 9% | 14 | 9% | even |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 23 | 9% | 4 | 3% | AFAS |
| Consumer services & leisure | 20 | 7% | 5 | 3% | AFAS |
| Public, community & associations | 18 | 7% | 17 | 11% | Sage 100 |
| Commerce & trade | 13 | 5% | 10 | 7% | even |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 9 | 3% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Automotive | 6 | 2% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Hospitality & travel | 5 | 2% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Agriculture & forestry | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | AFAS | share | Sage 100 | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 229 | 85% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| United States | 10 | 4% | 92 | 61% | Sage 100 |
| Belgium | 7 | 3% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Germany | 5 | 2% | 33 | 22% | Sage 100 |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| France | 3 | 1% | 18 | 12% | Sage 100 |
| Austria | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Australia | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| BQ | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Switzerland | 1 | 0% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Finland | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Hungary | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Canada | – | – | 5 | 3% | outside top 12 |
| CM | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Italy | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| MA | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | AFAS | share | Sage 100 | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Finance & accounting | 291 | 34% | 159 | 45% | Sage 100 |
| Human resources | 171 | 20% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| IT operations & business systems | 76 | 9% | 44 | 13% | Sage 100 |
| Sales | 33 | 4% | 23 | 7% | Sage 100 |
| Software engineering | 21 | 2% | 6 | 2% | even |
| Product, program & project management | 19 | 2% | 17 | 5% | Sage 100 |
| Administration & office | 18 | 2% | 9 | 3% | even |
| Agriculture and environment | 16 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Procurement and purchasing | 10 | 1% | 5 | 1% | even |
| Construction and civil | 9 | 1% | 11 | 3% | Sage 100 |
| Data & AI | 9 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Customer service & success | 8 | 1% | 4 | 1% | even |
| Logistics warehouse and transport | – | – | 20 | 6% | outside top 12 |
| General management & consulting | – | – | 5 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Engineering (non-software) | – | – | 3 | 1% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using AFAS →
Companies using Sage 100 →
ERP suites ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
Sage 100 is named by 152 companies in job postings and AFAS by 270; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/afas-vs-sage-100)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
AFAS vs Sage 100: questions
Which is more used, AFAS or Sage 100?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, AFAS (270) over Sage 100 (152). By website-and-DNS footprint, Sage 100 (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses AFAS?
47% of AFAS companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 60% for Sage 100. 26% of AFAS companies have over 1,000 employees, against 10% for Sage 100.
Do companies run both?
0 companies name both in their postings, usually AFAS in marketing and Sage 100 in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on AFAS or Sage 100. Start free, no card.