Breaknorm
Sign inStart free

Product

SignalsPeopleCompaniesLocal businessesMCP and API

Plays

Post engagersTeam build-outChampion movedHiring surgeNewly fundedLookalikesAll plays

Data

Coverage by countryHiring dataJob changesEmail verificationCompanies by toolWho is hiringMarket mapsOutboundCompany profilesCompare
PricingDatasetsDocsSign in
Compare · low code bpm rpa

Airtable VS FileMaker

As of 30 October 2026, FileMaker is named by 100 companies and Airtable by 653; Airtable skews to companies under 200 people (60% vs 49%), FileMaker to companies over 1,000 (27% vs 19%).

As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.

The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Airtable's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, FileMaker rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.

Airtable: 2–200 employees
60%
FileMaker: 2–200 employees
49%
Airtable: 1,000+ employees
19%
FileMaker: 1,000+ employees
27%
Postings per company, 90 days
2.6 · 2.3
Website or DNS footprint
6,117 · 0
653companies name Airtable
100companies name FileMaker
0name both
1,696 · 228postings in 90 days, Airtable · FileMaker
02Side by side

Who chooses which

Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.

By company size
SegmentAirtableshareFileMakershareLeans
Self-employed234%––outside top 12
2-10 employees9615%1212%Airtable
11-50 employees15323%2020%Airtable
51-200 employees14322%1717%Airtable
201-500 employees7612%1313%even
501-1000 employees396%1111%FileMaker
1001-5000 employees589%88%even
5001-10000 employees234%77%FileMaker
10,001+ employees426%1212%FileMaker
By industry
SegmentAirtableshareFileMakershareLeans
Business & finance services13621%88%Airtable
Technology & software11918%1212%Airtable
Public, community & associations9014%1919%FileMaker
Media & content8012%1010%Airtable
Consumer services & leisure7411%99%Airtable
Manufacturing & industry396%1515%FileMaker
Commerce & trade325%44%even
Property & construction274%66%even
Health care173%99%FileMaker
Hospitality & travel122%22%even
Transport, logistics & rental112%––outside top 12
Utilities & infrastructure91%33%even
Automotive––22%outside top 12
By country
SegmentAirtableshareFileMakershareLeans
United States45470%7676%FileMaker
Germany416%55%even
United Kingdom386%22%Airtable
Canada264%66%FileMaker
France203%11%Airtable
Netherlands102%11%even
India71%––outside top 12
Singapore71%––outside top 12
Australia61%11%even
Belgium51%11%even
Spain41%––outside top 12
Italy20%33%FileMaker
Sweden––22%outside top 12
Denmark––11%outside top 12
Postings by team (share of each tool's postings)
SegmentAirtableshareFileMakershareLeans
Marketing & communications24010%––outside top 12
Product, program & project management23010%237%Airtable
Administration & office1697%309%even
Software engineering1567%237%even
IT operations & business systems1466%124%Airtable
Sales1215%103%Airtable
Business development & strategy984%––outside top 12
Data & AI974%––outside top 12
Arts media and entertainment894%113%even
General management & consulting783%––outside top 12
Customer service & success562%––outside top 12
Finance & accounting532%134%even
Logistics warehouse and transport––175%outside top 12
Research and science––155%outside top 12
Quality, safety & environment––103%outside top 12
Education & training––62%outside top 12
Manufacturing and production––62%outside top 12
Cite this

Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.

FileMaker is named by 100 companies in job postings and Airtable by 653; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/airtable-vs-filemaker)
How we know

Read from the source, not self-reported

Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →

  • Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
  • Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
  • SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
  • Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
FAQ

Airtable vs FileMaker: questions

Which is more used, Airtable or FileMaker?

By companies naming it in their own job postings, Airtable (653) over FileMaker (100). By website-and-DNS footprint, Airtable (6,117 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.

Who chooses Airtable?

60% of Airtable companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 49% for FileMaker. 19% of Airtable companies have over 1,000 employees, against 27% for FileMaker.

Do companies run both?

0 companies name both in their postings, usually Airtable in marketing and FileMaker in sales, or during a migration.

Where do these numbers come from?

From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.

Companies and people

Get either list your way

The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.

Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it

Filter on Airtable or FileMaker. Start free, no card.

  1. 01Sign up, no card
  2. 02Connect Claude, ChatGPT or an API key
  3. 03Ask for your market