Altair HyperMesh VS Ansys HFSS
As of 30 October 2026, Ansys HFSS is named by 331 companies and Altair HyperMesh by 108; Altair HyperMesh skews to companies under 200 people (38% vs 46%), Ansys HFSS to companies over 1,000 (35% vs 46%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Altair HyperMesh's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Ansys HFSS rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- Altair HyperMesh: 2–200 employees
- 38%
- Ansys HFSS: 2–200 employees
- 46%
- Altair HyperMesh: 1,000+ employees
- 46%
- Ansys HFSS: 1,000+ employees
- 35%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 3.4 · 4.7
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | Altair HyperMesh | share | Ansys HFSS | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 1 | 1% | 4 | 1% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 8 | 7% | 44 | 13% | Ansys HFSS |
| 11-50 employees | 7 | 6% | 42 | 13% | Ansys HFSS |
| 51-200 employees | 26 | 24% | 65 | 20% | Altair HyperMesh |
| 201-500 employees | 10 | 9% | 36 | 11% | even |
| 501-1000 employees | 6 | 6% | 23 | 7% | even |
| 1001-5000 employees | 18 | 17% | 48 | 15% | Altair HyperMesh |
| 5001-10000 employees | 2 | 2% | 19 | 6% | Ansys HFSS |
| 10,001+ employees | 30 | 28% | 50 | 15% | Altair HyperMesh |
| Segment | Altair HyperMesh | share | Ansys HFSS | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturing & industry | 45 | 42% | 206 | 62% | Ansys HFSS |
| Business & finance services | 23 | 21% | 21 | 6% | Altair HyperMesh |
| Automotive | 17 | 16% | 8 | 2% | Altair HyperMesh |
| Technology & software | 17 | 16% | 54 | 16% | even |
| Public, community & associations | 3 | 3% | 11 | 3% | even |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 2 | 2% | 12 | 4% | even |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 1 | 1% | 5 | 2% | even |
| Consumer services & leisure | – | – | 6 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Media & content | – | – | 4 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Commerce & trade | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Property & construction | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Altair HyperMesh | share | Ansys HFSS | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 56 | 52% | 238 | 72% | Ansys HFSS |
| France | 11 | 10% | 10 | 3% | Altair HyperMesh |
| Germany | 7 | 6% | 15 | 5% | even |
| India | 5 | 5% | 7 | 2% | Altair HyperMesh |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 4% | 16 | 5% | even |
| Sweden | 4 | 4% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Canada | 3 | 3% | 5 | 2% | even |
| Poland | 3 | 3% | 3 | 1% | even |
| Austria | 2 | 2% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Spain | 2 | 2% | 3 | 1% | even |
| Italy | 2 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Netherlands | – | – | 4 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Singapore | – | – | 3 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Belgium | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Altair HyperMesh | share | Ansys HFSS | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Engineering (non-software) | 351 | 73% | 1,766 | 90% | Ansys HFSS |
| Software engineering | 14 | 3% | 12 | 1% | Altair HyperMesh |
| Data & AI | 5 | 1% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Quality, safety & environment | 4 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Sales | 3 | 1% | 13 | 1% | even |
| Construction and civil | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Customer service & success | 1 | 0% | 4 | 0% | even |
| Product, program & project management | 1 | 0% | 2 | 0% | even |
| Unclassified | 1 | 0% | 3 | 0% | even |
| Research and science | – | – | 28 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Design & UX | – | – | 4 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Marketing & communications | – | – | 2 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Arts media and entertainment | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| IT operations & business systems | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using Altair HyperMesh →
Companies using Ansys HFSS →
cae simulation ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
Ansys HFSS is named by 331 companies in job postings and Altair HyperMesh by 108; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/altair-hypermesh-vs-ansys-hfss)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
Altair HyperMesh vs Ansys HFSS: questions
Which is more used, Altair HyperMesh or Ansys HFSS?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, Ansys HFSS (331) over Altair HyperMesh (108). By website-and-DNS footprint, Ansys HFSS (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses Altair HyperMesh?
38% of Altair HyperMesh companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 46% for Ansys HFSS. 46% of Altair HyperMesh companies have over 1,000 employees, against 35% for Ansys HFSS.
Do companies run both?
0 companies name both in their postings, usually Altair HyperMesh in marketing and Ansys HFSS in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on Altair HyperMesh or Ansys HFSS. Start free, no card.