Breaknorm
Sign inStart free

Product

SignalsPeopleCompaniesLocal businessesMCP and API

Plays

Post engagersTeam build-outChampion movedHiring surgeNewly fundedLookalikesAll plays

Data

Coverage by countryHiring dataJob changesEmail verificationCompanies by toolWho is hiringMarket mapsOutboundCompany profilesCompare
PricingDatasetsDocsSign in
Compare · relational databases

Amazon Aurora VS PostgreSQL

As of 30 October 2026, PostgreSQL is named by 9,372 companies and Amazon Aurora by 771; Amazon Aurora skews to companies under 200 people (40% vs 62%), PostgreSQL to companies over 1,000 (16% vs 32%).

As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.

The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Amazon Aurora's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, PostgreSQL rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.

Amazon Aurora: 2–200 employees
40%
PostgreSQL: 2–200 employees
62%
Amazon Aurora: 1,000+ employees
32%
PostgreSQL: 1,000+ employees
16%
Postings per company, 90 days
2.4 · 3.0
Website or DNS footprint
0 · 0
771companies name Amazon Aurora
9,372companies name PostgreSQL
592name both
1,854 · 28,204postings in 90 days, Amazon Aurora · PostgreSQL
02Side by side

Who chooses which

Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.

By company size
SegmentAmazon AurorasharePostgreSQLshareLeans
Self-employed91%2132%even
2-10 employees547%1,16312%PostgreSQL
11-50 employees9312%2,45126%PostgreSQL
51-200 employees16421%2,18123%PostgreSQL
201-500 employees11815%1,14412%Amazon Aurora
501-1000 employees8611%6817%Amazon Aurora
1001-5000 employees12216%8369%Amazon Aurora
5001-10000 employees375%2112%Amazon Aurora
10,001+ employees8811%4925%Amazon Aurora
By industry
SegmentAmazon AurorasharePostgreSQLshareLeans
Technology & software39952%5,54359%PostgreSQL
Business & finance services16421%1,68118%Amazon Aurora
Manufacturing & industry476%5506%even
Utilities & infrastructure405%2062%Amazon Aurora
Media & content294%2743%even
Consumer services & leisure233%2172%even
Property & construction152%1211%even
Commerce & trade132%1812%even
Public, community & associations132%2082%even
Transport, logistics & rental91%1141%even
Health care71%1291%even
Automotive61%701%even
By country
SegmentAmazon AurorasharePostgreSQLshareLeans
United States51867%5,18955%Amazon Aurora
United Kingdom588%6177%even
Japan294%––outside top 12
Canada213%2162%even
Germany172%6437%PostgreSQL
Australia152%1101%even
France152%3374%even
India101%4044%PostgreSQL
Singapore81%––outside top 12
Brazil71%981%even
Spain61%––outside top 12
Italy61%1462%even
Poland––1612%outside top 12
Netherlands––1271%outside top 12
Switzerland––901%outside top 12
Postings by team (share of each tool's postings)
SegmentAmazon AurorasharePostgreSQLshareLeans
Software engineering1,13944%25,75564%PostgreSQL
IT operations & business systems50219%3,89710%Amazon Aurora
Data & AI41216%4,75912%Amazon Aurora
Engineering (non-software)833%6542%even
Product, program & project management361%3741%even
Sales241%2101%even
Customer service & success151%2561%even
Finance & accounting110%750%even
Construction and civil70%––outside top 12
Research and science60%––outside top 12
Unclassified60%820%even
Administration & office50%––outside top 12
Quality, safety & environment––750%outside top 12
Marketing & communications––580%outside top 12
General management & consulting––500%outside top 12
Cite this

Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.

PostgreSQL is named by 9,372 companies in job postings and Amazon Aurora by 771; 592 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/amazon-aurora-vs-postgresql)
How we know

Read from the source, not self-reported

Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →

  • Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
  • Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
  • SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
  • Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
FAQ

Amazon Aurora vs PostgreSQL: questions

Which is more used, Amazon Aurora or PostgreSQL?

By companies naming it in their own job postings, PostgreSQL (9,372) over Amazon Aurora (771). By website-and-DNS footprint, PostgreSQL (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.

Who chooses Amazon Aurora?

40% of Amazon Aurora companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 62% for PostgreSQL. 32% of Amazon Aurora companies have over 1,000 employees, against 16% for PostgreSQL.

Do companies run both?

592 companies name both in their postings, usually Amazon Aurora in marketing and PostgreSQL in sales, or during a migration.

Where do these numbers come from?

From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.

Companies and people

Get either list your way

The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.

Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it

Filter on Amazon Aurora or PostgreSQL. Start free, no card.

  1. 01Sign up, no card
  2. 02Connect Claude, ChatGPT or an API key
  3. 03Ask for your market