Amazon ECR VS containerd
As of 4 November 2026, containerd is named by 125 companies and Amazon ECR by 485; Amazon ECR skews to companies under 200 people (44% vs 54%), containerd to companies over 1,000 (23% vs 32%).
As of 4 November 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Amazon ECR's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, containerd rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- Amazon ECR: 2–200 employees
- 44%
- containerd: 2–200 employees
- 54%
- Amazon ECR: 1,000+ employees
- 32%
- containerd: 1,000+ employees
- 23%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 2.0 · 2.3
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | Amazon ECR | share | containerd | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 13 | 3% | 6 | 5% | containerd |
| 2-10 employees | 39 | 8% | 11 | 9% | even |
| 11-50 employees | 63 | 13% | 22 | 18% | containerd |
| 51-200 employees | 113 | 23% | 34 | 27% | containerd |
| 201-500 employees | 58 | 12% | 18 | 14% | containerd |
| 501-1000 employees | 45 | 9% | 5 | 4% | Amazon ECR |
| 1001-5000 employees | 64 | 13% | 17 | 14% | even |
| 5001-10000 employees | 25 | 5% | 3 | 2% | Amazon ECR |
| 10,001+ employees | 65 | 13% | 9 | 7% | Amazon ECR |
| Segment | Amazon ECR | share | containerd | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology & software | 214 | 44% | 77 | 62% | containerd |
| Business & finance services | 79 | 16% | 14 | 11% | Amazon ECR |
| Manufacturing & industry | 78 | 16% | 18 | 14% | even |
| Public, community & associations | 20 | 4% | 3 | 2% | even |
| Media & content | 19 | 4% | 3 | 2% | even |
| Consumer services & leisure | 16 | 3% | 5 | 4% | even |
| Automotive | 15 | 3% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 12 | 2% | 2 | 2% | even |
| Health care | 11 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Commerce & trade | 7 | 1% | 2 | 2% | even |
| Property & construction | 6 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 6 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Hospitality & travel | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Amazon ECR | share | containerd | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 329 | 68% | 89 | 71% | containerd |
| United Kingdom | 22 | 5% | 3 | 2% | Amazon ECR |
| India | 19 | 4% | 2 | 2% | Amazon ECR |
| Germany | 16 | 3% | 3 | 2% | even |
| France | 14 | 3% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Canada | 11 | 2% | 2 | 2% | even |
| Japan | 6 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Australia | 5 | 1% | 3 | 2% | even |
| Spain | 4 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Singapore | 4 | 1% | 4 | 3% | containerd |
| Brazil | 3 | 1% | 2 | 2% | even |
| Sweden | 3 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Luxembourg | – | – | 3 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Austria | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Switzerland | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Colombia | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Amazon ECR | share | containerd | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Software engineering | 543 | 44% | 257 | 72% | containerd |
| Data & AI | 163 | 13% | 9 | 3% | Amazon ECR |
| Engineering (non-software) | 120 | 10% | 16 | 4% | Amazon ECR |
| IT operations & business systems | 107 | 9% | 33 | 9% | even |
| Product, program & project management | 29 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Healthcare clinical | 28 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Social care and community | 23 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Administration & office | 11 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Sales | 10 | 1% | 5 | 1% | even |
| Construction and civil | 9 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Human resources | 7 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Quality, safety & environment | 7 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Customer service & success | 6 | 0% | 3 | 1% | even |
| Manufacturing and production | 4 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Finance & accounting | 3 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| General management & consulting | 3 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Logistics warehouse and transport | 3 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Education & training | 2 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Healthcare support and caregiving | 2 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Business development & strategy | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Design & UX | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Marketing & communications | 1 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Skilled trades and field service | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Unclassified | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using Amazon ECR →
Companies using containerd →
containers ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
containerd is named by 125 companies in job postings and Amazon ECR by 485; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 4 November 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/amazon-ecr-vs-containerd)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
Amazon ECR vs containerd: questions
Which is more used, Amazon ECR or containerd?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, Amazon ECR (485) over containerd (125). By website-and-DNS footprint, containerd (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses Amazon ECR?
44% of Amazon ECR companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 54% for containerd. 32% of Amazon ECR companies have over 1,000 employees, against 23% for containerd.
Do companies run both?
0 companies name both in their postings, usually Amazon ECR in marketing and containerd in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on Amazon ECR or containerd. Start free, no card.