Amazon EMR VS Apache Pig
As of 30 October 2026, Apache Pig is named by 121 companies and Amazon EMR by 102; Amazon EMR skews to companies under 200 people (45% vs 54%), Apache Pig to companies over 1,000 (26% vs 34%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Amazon EMR's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Apache Pig rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- Amazon EMR: 2–200 employees
- 45%
- Apache Pig: 2–200 employees
- 54%
- Amazon EMR: 1,000+ employees
- 34%
- Apache Pig: 1,000+ employees
- 26%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 3.3 · 1.8
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | Amazon EMR | share | Apache Pig | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 2 | 2% | 4 | 3% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 7 | 7% | 4 | 3% | Amazon EMR |
| 11-50 employees | 16 | 16% | 27 | 22% | Apache Pig |
| 51-200 employees | 23 | 23% | 34 | 28% | Apache Pig |
| 201-500 employees | 11 | 11% | 11 | 9% | even |
| 501-1000 employees | 8 | 8% | 9 | 7% | even |
| 1001-5000 employees | 16 | 16% | 13 | 11% | Amazon EMR |
| 5001-10000 employees | 5 | 5% | 2 | 2% | Amazon EMR |
| 10,001+ employees | 14 | 14% | 17 | 14% | even |
| Segment | Amazon EMR | share | Apache Pig | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology & software | 61 | 60% | 77 | 64% | Apache Pig |
| Business & finance services | 23 | 23% | 20 | 17% | Amazon EMR |
| Manufacturing & industry | 5 | 5% | 12 | 10% | Apache Pig |
| Media & content | 4 | 4% | 1 | 1% | Amazon EMR |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 3 | 3% | 1 | 1% | Amazon EMR |
| Public, community & associations | 2 | 2% | 3 | 2% | even |
| Consumer services & leisure | 2 | 2% | 4 | 3% | even |
| Property & construction | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 1 | 1% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Health care | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Hospitality & travel | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Amazon EMR | share | Apache Pig | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 78 | 76% | 85 | 70% | Amazon EMR |
| India | 5 | 5% | 4 | 3% | even |
| Canada | 2 | 2% | 2 | 2% | even |
| Switzerland | 2 | 2% | 2 | 2% | even |
| Singapore | 2 | 2% | 2 | 2% | even |
| Argentina | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Australia | 1 | 1% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Germany | 1 | 1% | 2 | 2% | even |
| Estonia | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Spain | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| France | 1 | 1% | 5 | 4% | Apache Pig |
| Italy | 1 | 1% | 2 | 2% | even |
| United Kingdom | – | – | 6 | 5% | outside top 12 |
| Belgium | – | – | 2 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Colombia | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Amazon EMR | share | Apache Pig | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Data & AI | 296 | 67% | 589 | 69% | even |
| Software engineering | 86 | 19% | 134 | 16% | Amazon EMR |
| IT operations & business systems | 11 | 2% | 18 | 2% | even |
| Sales | 8 | 2% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Product, program & project management | 6 | 1% | 2 | 0% | even |
| Business development & strategy | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Education & training | 1 | 0% | 2 | 0% | even |
| Engineering (non-software) | – | – | 4 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Marketing & communications | – | – | 2 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Legal, compliance & risk | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Research and science | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Unclassified | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using Amazon EMR →
Companies using Apache Pig →
distributed processing ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
Apache Pig is named by 121 companies in job postings and Amazon EMR by 102; 7 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/amazon-emr-vs-apache-pig)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
Amazon EMR vs Apache Pig: questions
Which is more used, Amazon EMR or Apache Pig?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, Apache Pig (121) over Amazon EMR (102). By website-and-DNS footprint, Apache Pig (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses Amazon EMR?
45% of Amazon EMR companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 54% for Apache Pig. 34% of Amazon EMR companies have over 1,000 employees, against 26% for Apache Pig.
Do companies run both?
7 companies name both in their postings, usually Amazon EMR in marketing and Apache Pig in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on Amazon EMR or Apache Pig. Start free, no card.