Amazon Inspector VS Nessus
As of 30 October 2026, Nessus is named by 445 companies and Amazon Inspector by 101; Amazon Inspector skews to companies under 200 people (46% vs 44%), Nessus to companies over 1,000 (32% vs 27%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Amazon Inspector's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Nessus rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- Amazon Inspector: 2–200 employees
- 46%
- Nessus: 2–200 employees
- 44%
- Amazon Inspector: 1,000+ employees
- 27%
- Nessus: 1,000+ employees
- 32%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 1.9 · 3.1
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | Amazon Inspector | share | Nessus | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-10 employees | 3 | 3% | 22 | 5% | even |
| 11-50 employees | 13 | 13% | 69 | 16% | Nessus |
| 51-200 employees | 30 | 30% | 105 | 24% | Amazon Inspector |
| 201-500 employees | 17 | 17% | 66 | 15% | Amazon Inspector |
| 501-1000 employees | 11 | 11% | 36 | 8% | Amazon Inspector |
| 1001-5000 employees | 15 | 15% | 62 | 14% | even |
| 5001-10000 employees | 5 | 5% | 20 | 4% | even |
| 10,001+ employees | 7 | 7% | 61 | 14% | Nessus |
| Self-employed | – | – | 4 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Amazon Inspector | share | Nessus | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology & software | 50 | 50% | 230 | 52% | Nessus |
| Business & finance services | 27 | 27% | 79 | 18% | Amazon Inspector |
| Manufacturing & industry | 10 | 10% | 69 | 16% | Nessus |
| Commerce & trade | 2 | 2% | 6 | 1% | even |
| Public, community & associations | 2 | 2% | 12 | 3% | even |
| Consumer services & leisure | 2 | 2% | 13 | 3% | even |
| Property & construction | 2 | 2% | 6 | 1% | even |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 2 | 2% | 17 | 4% | even |
| Automotive | 1 | 1% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Health care | 1 | 1% | 2 | 0% | even |
| Hospitality & travel | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Media & content | 1 | 1% | 5 | 1% | even |
| Transport, logistics & rental | – | – | 4 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Amazon Inspector | share | Nessus | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 60 | 59% | 318 | 71% | Nessus |
| United Kingdom | 9 | 9% | 21 | 5% | Amazon Inspector |
| Australia | 4 | 4% | 4 | 1% | Amazon Inspector |
| Canada | 4 | 4% | 7 | 2% | Amazon Inspector |
| Singapore | 4 | 4% | 5 | 1% | Amazon Inspector |
| Germany | 3 | 3% | 10 | 2% | even |
| Austria | 2 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Spain | 2 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| France | 2 | 2% | 12 | 3% | even |
| Poland | 2 | 2% | 5 | 1% | even |
| Belgium | 1 | 1% | 4 | 1% | even |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| India | – | – | 11 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| United Arab Emirates | – | – | 5 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Italy | – | – | 5 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Amazon Inspector | share | Nessus | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IT operations & business systems | 140 | 56% | 1,494 | 78% | Nessus |
| Software engineering | 68 | 27% | 99 | 5% | Amazon Inspector |
| Data & AI | 9 | 4% | 8 | 0% | Amazon Inspector |
| Product, program & project management | 4 | 2% | 14 | 1% | even |
| Sales | 3 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Engineering (non-software) | 2 | 1% | 55 | 3% | Nessus |
| Quality, safety & environment | 2 | 1% | 6 | 0% | even |
| Administration & office | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Construction and civil | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Design & UX | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Human resources | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Logistics warehouse and transport | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Customer service & success | – | – | 13 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Education & training | – | – | 9 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Legal, compliance & risk | – | – | 8 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Skilled trades and field service | – | – | 8 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Facilities cleaning and security | – | – | 6 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Finance & accounting | – | – | 4 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using Amazon Inspector →
Companies using Nessus →
vulnerability management ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
Nessus is named by 445 companies in job postings and Amazon Inspector by 101; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/amazon-inspector-vs-nessus)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
Amazon Inspector vs Nessus: questions
Which is more used, Amazon Inspector or Nessus?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, Nessus (445) over Amazon Inspector (101). By website-and-DNS footprint, Nessus (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses Amazon Inspector?
46% of Amazon Inspector companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 44% for Nessus. 27% of Amazon Inspector companies have over 1,000 employees, against 32% for Nessus.
Do companies run both?
0 companies name both in their postings, usually Amazon Inspector in marketing and Nessus in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on Amazon Inspector or Nessus. Start free, no card.