Amazon QuickSight VS Cube
As of 30 October 2026, Cube is named by 198 companies and Amazon QuickSight by 262; Amazon QuickSight skews to companies under 200 people (38% vs 38%), Cube to companies over 1,000 (31% vs 37%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Amazon QuickSight's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Cube rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- Amazon QuickSight: 2–200 employees
- 38%
- Cube: 2–200 employees
- 38%
- Amazon QuickSight: 1,000+ employees
- 37%
- Cube: 1,000+ employees
- 31%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 3.6 · 2.0
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | Amazon QuickSight | share | Cube | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-10 employees | 7 | 3% | 8 | 4% | even |
| 11-50 employees | 30 | 11% | 24 | 12% | even |
| 51-200 employees | 62 | 24% | 44 | 22% | even |
| 201-500 employees | 38 | 15% | 40 | 20% | Cube |
| 501-1000 employees | 27 | 10% | 17 | 9% | even |
| 1001-5000 employees | 40 | 15% | 32 | 16% | even |
| 5001-10000 employees | 13 | 5% | 8 | 4% | even |
| 10,001+ employees | 45 | 17% | 22 | 11% | Amazon QuickSight |
| Self-employed | – | – | 3 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Amazon QuickSight | share | Cube | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology & software | 119 | 45% | 78 | 39% | Amazon QuickSight |
| Business & finance services | 67 | 26% | 50 | 25% | even |
| Manufacturing & industry | 18 | 7% | 19 | 10% | Cube |
| Consumer services & leisure | 13 | 5% | 3 | 2% | Amazon QuickSight |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 12 | 5% | 2 | 1% | Amazon QuickSight |
| Media & content | 8 | 3% | 10 | 5% | even |
| Public, community & associations | 7 | 3% | 5 | 3% | even |
| Automotive | 4 | 2% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Property & construction | 4 | 2% | 11 | 6% | Cube |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 4 | 2% | 5 | 3% | even |
| Commerce & trade | 3 | 1% | 6 | 3% | even |
| Health care | 2 | 1% | 6 | 3% | Cube |
| Segment | Amazon QuickSight | share | Cube | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 153 | 58% | 139 | 70% | Cube |
| United Kingdom | 22 | 8% | 13 | 7% | even |
| Canada | 16 | 6% | 5 | 3% | Amazon QuickSight |
| Germany | 14 | 5% | 6 | 3% | Amazon QuickSight |
| Australia | 8 | 3% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Singapore | 7 | 3% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Brazil | 4 | 2% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Spain | 4 | 2% | 2 | 1% | even |
| India | 4 | 2% | 4 | 2% | even |
| Japan | 4 | 2% | 2 | 1% | even |
| United Arab Emirates | 3 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| France | 3 | 1% | 3 | 2% | even |
| Netherlands | – | – | 4 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Italy | – | – | 3 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Denmark | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Amazon QuickSight | share | Cube | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Data & AI | 542 | 45% | 136 | 24% | Amazon QuickSight |
| Product, program & project management | 130 | 11% | 12 | 2% | Amazon QuickSight |
| Software engineering | 83 | 7% | 35 | 6% | even |
| IT operations & business systems | 67 | 6% | 117 | 21% | Cube |
| Finance & accounting | 63 | 5% | 28 | 5% | even |
| Legal, compliance & risk | 23 | 2% | 5 | 1% | even |
| Logistics warehouse and transport | 23 | 2% | 4 | 1% | even |
| Marketing & communications | 20 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Sales | 18 | 2% | 9 | 2% | even |
| Engineering (non-software) | 13 | 1% | 41 | 7% | Cube |
| General management & consulting | 13 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Customer service & success | 12 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Construction and civil | – | – | 14 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Quality, safety & environment | – | – | 13 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Arts media and entertainment | – | – | 2 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using Amazon QuickSight →
Companies using Cube →
BI & reporting ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
Cube is named by 198 companies in job postings and Amazon QuickSight by 262; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/amazon-quicksight-vs-cube)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
Amazon QuickSight vs Cube: questions
Which is more used, Amazon QuickSight or Cube?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, Amazon QuickSight (262) over Cube (198). By website-and-DNS footprint, Cube (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses Amazon QuickSight?
38% of Amazon QuickSight companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 38% for Cube. 37% of Amazon QuickSight companies have over 1,000 employees, against 31% for Cube.
Do companies run both?
0 companies name both in their postings, usually Amazon QuickSight in marketing and Cube in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on Amazon QuickSight or Cube. Start free, no card.