Breaknorm
Sign inStart free

Product

SignalsPeopleCompaniesLocal businessesMCP and API

Plays

Post engagersTeam build-outChampion movedHiring surgeNewly fundedLookalikesAll plays

Data

Coverage by countryHiring dataJob changesEmail verificationCompanies by toolWho is hiringMarket mapsOutboundCompany profilesCompare
PricingDatasetsDocsSign in
Compare · storage systems

Amazon S3 VS Pure Storage

As of 30 October 2026, Pure Storage is named by 170 companies and Amazon S3 by 3,346; Amazon S3 skews to companies under 200 people (49% vs 27%), Pure Storage to companies over 1,000 (47% vs 26%).

As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.

The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Amazon S3's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Pure Storage rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.

Amazon S3: 2–200 employees
49%
Pure Storage: 2–200 employees
27%
Amazon S3: 1,000+ employees
26%
Pure Storage: 1,000+ employees
47%
Postings per company, 90 days
3.1 · 3.1
Website or DNS footprint
0 · 0
3,346companies name Amazon S3
170companies name Pure Storage
0name both
10,531 · 528postings in 90 days, Amazon S3 · Pure Storage
02Side by side

Who chooses which

Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.

By company size
SegmentAmazon S3sharePure StorageshareLeans
Self-employed401%––outside top 12
2-10 employees2648%53%Amazon S3
11-50 employees55717%159%Amazon S3
51-200 employees80924%2615%Amazon S3
201-500 employees46814%2515%even
501-1000 employees33810%1911%even
1001-5000 employees45914%4325%Pure Storage
5001-10000 employees1194%169%Pure Storage
10,001+ employees2929%2112%Pure Storage
By industry
SegmentAmazon S3sharePure StorageshareLeans
Technology & software1,85455%7444%Amazon S3
Business & finance services64019%3521%even
Manufacturing & industry2578%2816%Pure Storage
Media & content1254%––outside top 12
Consumer services & leisure893%32%even
Public, community & associations692%53%even
Commerce & trade682%42%even
Utilities & infrastructure662%42%even
Health care461%64%Pure Storage
Transport, logistics & rental391%32%even
Automotive301%21%even
Hospitality & travel261%––outside top 12
Property & construction––32%outside top 12
Agriculture & forestry––11%outside top 12
By country
SegmentAmazon S3sharePure StorageshareLeans
United States2,20366%11970%Pure Storage
United Kingdom2457%85%Amazon S3
Germany1334%95%even
India1173%21%Amazon S3
France752%42%even
Canada692%53%even
Australia512%21%even
Singapore451%21%even
Brazil331%––outside top 12
Netherlands321%––outside top 12
Japan261%––outside top 12
Spain231%––outside top 12
United Arab Emirates––32%outside top 12
Italy––32%outside top 12
Austria––21%outside top 12
Poland––21%outside top 12
Postings by team (share of each tool's postings)
SegmentAmazon S3sharePure StorageshareLeans
Software engineering6,36144%426%Amazon S3
Data & AI4,01828%71%Amazon S3
IT operations & business systems1,82013%32749%Pure Storage
Product, program & project management2372%112%even
Customer service & success1381%101%even
Engineering (non-software)1291%538%Pure Storage
Sales1061%7411%Pure Storage
Finance & accounting240%41%even
General management & consulting220%41%even
Unclassified200%91%even
Quality, safety & environment160%––outside top 12
Arts media and entertainment140%––outside top 12
Logistics warehouse and transport––41%outside top 12
Research and science––41%outside top 12
Cite this

Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.

Pure Storage is named by 170 companies in job postings and Amazon S3 by 3,346; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/amazon-s3-vs-pure-storage)
How we know

Read from the source, not self-reported

Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →

  • Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
  • Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
  • SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
  • Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
FAQ

Amazon S3 vs Pure Storage: questions

Which is more used, Amazon S3 or Pure Storage?

By companies naming it in their own job postings, Amazon S3 (3,346) over Pure Storage (170). By website-and-DNS footprint, Pure Storage (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.

Who chooses Amazon S3?

49% of Amazon S3 companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 27% for Pure Storage. 26% of Amazon S3 companies have over 1,000 employees, against 47% for Pure Storage.

Do companies run both?

0 companies name both in their postings, usually Amazon S3 in marketing and Pure Storage in sales, or during a migration.

Where do these numbers come from?

From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.

Companies and people

Get either list your way

The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.

Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it

Filter on Amazon S3 or Pure Storage. Start free, no card.

  1. 01Sign up, no card
  2. 02Connect Claude, ChatGPT or an API key
  3. 03Ask for your market