AMQP VS Java Message Service
As of 30 October 2026, Java Message Service is named by 425 companies and AMQP by 117; AMQP skews to companies under 200 people (48% vs 42%), Java Message Service to companies over 1,000 (31% vs 32%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: AMQP's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Java Message Service rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- AMQP: 2–200 employees
- 48%
- Java Message Service: 2–200 employees
- 42%
- AMQP: 1,000+ employees
- 32%
- Java Message Service: 1,000+ employees
- 31%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 2.5 · 2.7
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | AMQP | share | Java Message Service | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 1 | 1% | 6 | 1% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 2 | 2% | 24 | 6% | Java Message Service |
| 11-50 employees | 19 | 16% | 65 | 15% | even |
| 51-200 employees | 35 | 30% | 90 | 21% | AMQP |
| 201-500 employees | 17 | 15% | 69 | 16% | even |
| 501-1000 employees | 6 | 5% | 39 | 9% | Java Message Service |
| 1001-5000 employees | 15 | 13% | 51 | 12% | even |
| 5001-10000 employees | 2 | 2% | 18 | 4% | Java Message Service |
| 10,001+ employees | 20 | 17% | 63 | 15% | AMQP |
| Segment | AMQP | share | Java Message Service | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology & software | 55 | 47% | 257 | 60% | Java Message Service |
| Business & finance services | 19 | 16% | 91 | 21% | Java Message Service |
| Manufacturing & industry | 19 | 16% | 23 | 5% | AMQP |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 5 | 4% | 8 | 2% | AMQP |
| Media & content | 4 | 3% | 6 | 1% | AMQP |
| Public, community & associations | 3 | 3% | 7 | 2% | even |
| Automotive | 2 | 2% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Commerce & trade | 2 | 2% | 9 | 2% | even |
| Health care | 2 | 2% | 3 | 1% | even |
| Property & construction | 2 | 2% | 5 | 1% | even |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 2 | 2% | 5 | 1% | even |
| Consumer services & leisure | 1 | 1% | 10 | 2% | even |
| Segment | AMQP | share | Java Message Service | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 61 | 52% | 255 | 60% | Java Message Service |
| Germany | 11 | 9% | 13 | 3% | AMQP |
| United Kingdom | 11 | 9% | 26 | 6% | AMQP |
| France | 4 | 3% | 17 | 4% | even |
| Belgium | 3 | 3% | 4 | 1% | even |
| Canada | 3 | 3% | 8 | 2% | even |
| Spain | 3 | 3% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Sweden | 3 | 3% | 8 | 2% | even |
| Italy | 2 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Singapore | 2 | 2% | 5 | 1% | even |
| Austria | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Australia | 1 | 1% | 4 | 1% | even |
| India | – | – | 21 | 5% | outside top 12 |
| Switzerland | – | – | 7 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Poland | – | – | 6 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | AMQP | share | Java Message Service | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Software engineering | 271 | 70% | 1,594 | 73% | Java Message Service |
| Data & AI | 25 | 6% | 28 | 1% | AMQP |
| IT operations & business systems | 25 | 6% | 214 | 10% | Java Message Service |
| Engineering (non-software) | 13 | 3% | 22 | 1% | AMQP |
| Customer service & success | 4 | 1% | 4 | 0% | even |
| Product, program & project management | 4 | 1% | 8 | 0% | even |
| Sales | – | – | 7 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Public safety and protective services | – | – | 5 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Logistics warehouse and transport | – | – | 4 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Construction and civil | – | – | 3 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Design & UX | – | – | 3 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Finance & accounting | – | – | 3 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using AMQP →
Companies using Java Message Service →
message brokers streaming ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
Java Message Service is named by 425 companies in job postings and AMQP by 117; 60 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/amqp-vs-jms)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
AMQP vs Java Message Service: questions
Which is more used, AMQP or Java Message Service?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, Java Message Service (425) over AMQP (117). By website-and-DNS footprint, Java Message Service (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses AMQP?
48% of AMQP companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 42% for Java Message Service. 32% of AMQP companies have over 1,000 employees, against 31% for Java Message Service.
Do companies run both?
60 companies name both in their postings, usually AMQP in marketing and Java Message Service in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on AMQP or Java Message Service. Start free, no card.