Android SDK VS Qt
As of 30 October 2026, Qt is named by 406 companies and Android SDK by 376; Android SDK skews to companies under 200 people (61% vs 49%), Qt to companies over 1,000 (30% vs 19%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Android SDK's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Qt rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- Android SDK: 2–200 employees
- 61%
- Qt: 2–200 employees
- 49%
- Android SDK: 1,000+ employees
- 19%
- Qt: 1,000+ employees
- 30%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 2.3 · 3.5
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | Android SDK | share | Qt | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 4 | 1% | 3 | 1% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 32 | 9% | 29 | 7% | even |
| 11-50 employees | 119 | 32% | 89 | 22% | Android SDK |
| 51-200 employees | 78 | 21% | 81 | 20% | even |
| 201-500 employees | 54 | 14% | 49 | 12% | Android SDK |
| 501-1000 employees | 16 | 4% | 35 | 9% | Qt |
| 1001-5000 employees | 35 | 9% | 50 | 12% | Qt |
| 5001-10000 employees | 8 | 2% | 11 | 3% | even |
| 10,001+ employees | 30 | 8% | 59 | 15% | Qt |
| Segment | Android SDK | share | Qt | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology & software | 257 | 68% | 117 | 29% | Android SDK |
| Business & finance services | 53 | 14% | 48 | 12% | Android SDK |
| Media & content | 18 | 5% | 13 | 3% | even |
| Manufacturing & industry | 13 | 3% | 176 | 43% | Qt |
| Consumer services & leisure | 11 | 3% | 12 | 3% | even |
| Automotive | 6 | 2% | 3 | 1% | even |
| Commerce & trade | 5 | 1% | 3 | 1% | even |
| Property & construction | 3 | 1% | 8 | 2% | even |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 3 | 1% | 4 | 1% | even |
| Public, community & associations | 2 | 1% | 8 | 2% | even |
| Hospitality & travel | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 2 | 1% | 9 | 2% | even |
| Health care | – | – | 3 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Android SDK | share | Qt | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 180 | 48% | 185 | 46% | Android SDK |
| India | 83 | 22% | 10 | 2% | Android SDK |
| United Kingdom | 20 | 5% | 19 | 5% | even |
| Singapore | 9 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Canada | 7 | 2% | 7 | 2% | even |
| Poland | 7 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Australia | 5 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Germany | 5 | 1% | 70 | 17% | Qt |
| France | 5 | 1% | 33 | 8% | Qt |
| United Arab Emirates | 4 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Netherlands | 4 | 1% | 7 | 2% | even |
| Romania | 4 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Italy | – | – | 11 | 3% | outside top 12 |
| Sweden | – | – | 10 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Austria | – | – | 8 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Switzerland | – | – | 6 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Finland | – | – | 5 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Android SDK | share | Qt | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Software engineering | 1,810 | 94% | 1,235 | 69% | Android SDK |
| Unclassified | 20 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| IT operations & business systems | 5 | 0% | 105 | 6% | Qt |
| Data & AI | 3 | 0% | 99 | 6% | Qt |
| Business development & strategy | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Customer service & success | 1 | 0% | 2 | 0% | even |
| Design & UX | 1 | 0% | 14 | 1% | even |
| Marketing & communications | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Product, program & project management | 1 | 0% | 34 | 2% | even |
| Quality, safety & environment | 1 | 0% | 7 | 0% | even |
| Retail & store operations | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Engineering (non-software) | – | – | 100 | 6% | outside top 12 |
| Logistics warehouse and transport | – | – | 6 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Manufacturing and production | – | – | 5 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Sales | – | – | 4 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Finance & accounting | – | – | 2 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using Android SDK →
Companies using Qt →
mobile desktop frameworks ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
Qt is named by 406 companies in job postings and Android SDK by 376; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/android-sdk-vs-qt)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
Android SDK vs Qt: questions
Which is more used, Android SDK or Qt?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, Qt (406) over Android SDK (376). By website-and-DNS footprint, Qt (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses Android SDK?
61% of Android SDK companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 49% for Qt. 19% of Android SDK companies have over 1,000 employees, against 30% for Qt.
Do companies run both?
0 companies name both in their postings, usually Android SDK in marketing and Qt in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on Android SDK or Qt. Start free, no card.