Apache Ant VS Swift Package Manager
As of 30 October 2026, Swift Package Manager is named by 205 companies and Apache Ant by 255; Apache Ant skews to companies under 200 people (48% vs 29%), Swift Package Manager to companies over 1,000 (53% vs 29%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Apache Ant's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Swift Package Manager rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- Apache Ant: 2–200 employees
- 48%
- Swift Package Manager: 2–200 employees
- 29%
- Apache Ant: 1,000+ employees
- 29%
- Swift Package Manager: 1,000+ employees
- 53%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 1.7 · 3.4
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | Apache Ant | share | Swift Package Manager | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 2 | 1% | 2 | 1% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 12 | 5% | 12 | 6% | even |
| 11-50 employees | 59 | 23% | 17 | 8% | Apache Ant |
| 51-200 employees | 51 | 20% | 31 | 15% | Apache Ant |
| 201-500 employees | 37 | 15% | 18 | 9% | Apache Ant |
| 501-1000 employees | 21 | 8% | 16 | 8% | even |
| 1001-5000 employees | 32 | 13% | 36 | 18% | Swift Package Manager |
| 5001-10000 employees | 11 | 4% | 12 | 6% | even |
| 10,001+ employees | 30 | 12% | 61 | 30% | Swift Package Manager |
| Segment | Apache Ant | share | Swift Package Manager | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology & software | 164 | 64% | 74 | 36% | Apache Ant |
| Business & finance services | 47 | 18% | 38 | 19% | even |
| Manufacturing & industry | 11 | 4% | 16 | 8% | Swift Package Manager |
| Commerce & trade | 6 | 2% | 7 | 3% | even |
| Public, community & associations | 6 | 2% | 7 | 3% | even |
| Media & content | 5 | 2% | 10 | 5% | Swift Package Manager |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 5 | 2% | 7 | 3% | even |
| Consumer services & leisure | 3 | 1% | 8 | 4% | Swift Package Manager |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 3 | 1% | 3 | 1% | even |
| Automotive | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Health care | 2 | 1% | 25 | 12% | Swift Package Manager |
| Property & construction | 1 | 0% | 4 | 2% | even |
| Hospitality & travel | – | – | 4 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Apache Ant | share | Swift Package Manager | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 153 | 60% | 130 | 63% | Swift Package Manager |
| United Kingdom | 19 | 7% | 10 | 5% | Apache Ant |
| India | 12 | 5% | 6 | 3% | even |
| Germany | 11 | 4% | 7 | 3% | even |
| Canada | 6 | 2% | 5 | 2% | even |
| France | 6 | 2% | 6 | 3% | even |
| Australia | 5 | 2% | 5 | 2% | even |
| Singapore | 4 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Switzerland | 3 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Netherlands | 3 | 1% | 3 | 1% | even |
| Romania | 3 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Austria | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Japan | – | – | 4 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| MY | – | – | 4 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| United Arab Emirates | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Czechia | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Apache Ant | share | Swift Package Manager | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Software engineering | 1,289 | 77% | 360 | 40% | Apache Ant |
| IT operations & business systems | 166 | 10% | 190 | 21% | Swift Package Manager |
| Engineering (non-software) | 21 | 1% | 6 | 1% | even |
| Data & AI | 15 | 1% | 8 | 1% | even |
| Unclassified | 14 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Customer service & success | 9 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Product, program & project management | 9 | 1% | 23 | 3% | even |
| General management & consulting | 4 | 0% | 19 | 2% | even |
| Administration & office | 3 | 0% | 8 | 1% | even |
| Education & training | 3 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Design & UX | 2 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Business development & strategy | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Healthcare support and caregiving | – | – | 60 | 7% | outside top 12 |
| Research and science | – | – | 39 | 4% | outside top 12 |
| Legal, compliance & risk | – | – | 38 | 4% | outside top 12 |
| Construction and civil | – | – | 8 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Sales | – | – | 7 | 1% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using Apache Ant →
Companies using Swift Package Manager →
build packaging ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
Swift Package Manager is named by 205 companies in job postings and Apache Ant by 255; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/apache-ant-vs-swift-package-manager)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
Apache Ant vs Swift Package Manager: questions
Which is more used, Apache Ant or Swift Package Manager?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, Apache Ant (255) over Swift Package Manager (205). By website-and-DNS footprint, Swift Package Manager (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses Apache Ant?
48% of Apache Ant companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 29% for Swift Package Manager. 29% of Apache Ant companies have over 1,000 employees, against 53% for Swift Package Manager.
Do companies run both?
0 companies name both in their postings, usually Apache Ant in marketing and Swift Package Manager in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on Apache Ant or Swift Package Manager. Start free, no card.