Apache Avro VS JSON
As of 30 October 2026, JSON is named by 4,803 companies and Apache Avro by 214; Apache Avro skews to companies under 200 people (36% vs 48%), JSON to companies over 1,000 (28% vs 37%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Apache Avro's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, JSON rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- Apache Avro: 2–200 employees
- 36%
- JSON: 2–200 employees
- 48%
- Apache Avro: 1,000+ employees
- 37%
- JSON: 1,000+ employees
- 28%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 2.1 · 3.5
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | Apache Avro | share | JSON | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 4 | 2% | 44 | 1% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 11 | 5% | 301 | 6% | even |
| 11-50 employees | 28 | 13% | 932 | 19% | JSON |
| 51-200 employees | 39 | 18% | 1,092 | 23% | JSON |
| 201-500 employees | 30 | 14% | 634 | 13% | even |
| 501-1000 employees | 22 | 10% | 463 | 10% | even |
| 1001-5000 employees | 38 | 18% | 731 | 15% | Apache Avro |
| 5001-10000 employees | 7 | 3% | 201 | 4% | even |
| 10,001+ employees | 35 | 16% | 405 | 8% | Apache Avro |
| Segment | Apache Avro | share | JSON | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology & software | 109 | 51% | 2,410 | 50% | even |
| Business & finance services | 54 | 25% | 989 | 21% | Apache Avro |
| Manufacturing & industry | 16 | 7% | 442 | 9% | even |
| Commerce & trade | 6 | 3% | 136 | 3% | even |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 6 | 3% | 115 | 2% | even |
| Public, community & associations | 4 | 2% | 111 | 2% | even |
| Consumer services & leisure | 4 | 2% | 115 | 2% | even |
| Media & content | 4 | 2% | 119 | 2% | even |
| Health care | 3 | 1% | 88 | 2% | even |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 3 | 1% | 86 | 2% | even |
| Hospitality & travel | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Property & construction | 2 | 1% | 90 | 2% | even |
| Automotive | – | – | 52 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Apache Avro | share | JSON | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 139 | 65% | 2,748 | 57% | Apache Avro |
| United Kingdom | 16 | 7% | 324 | 7% | even |
| Germany | 7 | 3% | 271 | 6% | JSON |
| India | 6 | 3% | 276 | 6% | JSON |
| Portugal | 5 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Canada | 4 | 2% | 141 | 3% | even |
| Switzerland | 4 | 2% | 51 | 1% | even |
| Spain | 4 | 2% | 57 | 1% | even |
| France | 4 | 2% | 134 | 3% | even |
| Austria | 3 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Netherlands | 3 | 1% | 69 | 1% | even |
| Poland | 3 | 1% | 55 | 1% | even |
| Australia | – | – | 83 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Italy | – | – | 56 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Apache Avro | share | JSON | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Data & AI | 271 | 43% | 1,783 | 7% | Apache Avro |
| Software engineering | 233 | 37% | 10,471 | 43% | JSON |
| IT operations & business systems | 19 | 3% | 2,376 | 10% | JSON |
| Engineering (non-software) | 4 | 1% | 567 | 2% | even |
| Product, program & project management | 4 | 1% | 515 | 2% | even |
| Sales | 4 | 1% | 616 | 3% | even |
| Construction and civil | 3 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Customer service & success | 3 | 0% | 326 | 1% | even |
| General management & consulting | 2 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Finance & accounting | 1 | 0% | 225 | 1% | even |
| Logistics warehouse and transport | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Quality, safety & environment | 1 | 0% | 211 | 1% | even |
| Unclassified | – | – | 177 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Marketing & communications | – | – | 174 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Skilled trades and field service | – | – | 136 | 1% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using Apache Avro →
Companies using JSON →
api specs data formats ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
JSON is named by 4,803 companies in job postings and Apache Avro by 214; 138 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/apache-avro-vs-json)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
Apache Avro vs JSON: questions
Which is more used, Apache Avro or JSON?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, JSON (4,803) over Apache Avro (214). By website-and-DNS footprint, JSON (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses Apache Avro?
36% of Apache Avro companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 48% for JSON. 37% of Apache Avro companies have over 1,000 employees, against 28% for JSON.
Do companies run both?
138 companies name both in their postings, usually Apache Avro in marketing and JSON in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on Apache Avro or JSON. Start free, no card.