Apache Beam VS Cloudera
As of 30 October 2026, Cloudera is named by 142 companies and Apache Beam by 178; Apache Beam skews to companies under 200 people (41% vs 44%), Cloudera to companies over 1,000 (37% vs 34%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Apache Beam's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Cloudera rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- Apache Beam: 2–200 employees
- 41%
- Cloudera: 2–200 employees
- 44%
- Apache Beam: 1,000+ employees
- 34%
- Cloudera: 1,000+ employees
- 37%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 2.7 · 4.3
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | Apache Beam | share | Cloudera | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 6 | 3% | 2 | 1% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 16 | 9% | 7 | 5% | Apache Beam |
| 11-50 employees | 24 | 13% | 21 | 15% | even |
| 51-200 employees | 33 | 19% | 34 | 24% | Cloudera |
| 201-500 employees | 22 | 12% | 16 | 11% | even |
| 501-1000 employees | 16 | 9% | 10 | 7% | even |
| 1001-5000 employees | 30 | 17% | 22 | 15% | even |
| 5001-10000 employees | 9 | 5% | 9 | 6% | even |
| 10,001+ employees | 22 | 12% | 21 | 15% | Cloudera |
| Segment | Apache Beam | share | Cloudera | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology & software | 97 | 54% | 95 | 67% | Cloudera |
| Business & finance services | 32 | 18% | 28 | 20% | even |
| Manufacturing & industry | 12 | 7% | 5 | 4% | Apache Beam |
| Media & content | 9 | 5% | 1 | 1% | Apache Beam |
| Public, community & associations | 8 | 4% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Health care | 5 | 3% | 1 | 1% | Apache Beam |
| Property & construction | 4 | 2% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Commerce & trade | 3 | 2% | 3 | 2% | even |
| Consumer services & leisure | 3 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Automotive | 2 | 1% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 2 | 1% | 3 | 2% | even |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 1 | 1% | 3 | 2% | even |
| Segment | Apache Beam | share | Cloudera | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 129 | 72% | 84 | 59% | Apache Beam |
| India | 7 | 4% | 3 | 2% | even |
| Germany | 6 | 3% | 5 | 4% | even |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 3% | 5 | 4% | even |
| Canada | 4 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Spain | 4 | 2% | 3 | 2% | even |
| France | 4 | 2% | 7 | 5% | Cloudera |
| United Arab Emirates | 3 | 2% | 3 | 2% | even |
| Poland | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Sweden | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Singapore | 2 | 1% | 6 | 4% | Cloudera |
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Italy | – | – | 5 | 4% | outside top 12 |
| Czechia | – | – | 4 | 3% | outside top 12 |
| Belgium | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Brazil | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Apache Beam | share | Cloudera | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Data & AI | 382 | 56% | 608 | 56% | even |
| Software engineering | 136 | 20% | 147 | 14% | Apache Beam |
| Construction and civil | 18 | 3% | 2 | 0% | Apache Beam |
| Engineering (non-software) | 16 | 2% | 6 | 1% | even |
| Healthcare clinical | 16 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| IT operations & business systems | 10 | 1% | 106 | 10% | Cloudera |
| Business development & strategy | 6 | 1% | 3 | 0% | even |
| Research and science | 4 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Design & UX | 3 | 0% | 2 | 0% | even |
| General management & consulting | 2 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Product, program & project management | 2 | 0% | 15 | 1% | even |
| Sales | 2 | 0% | 47 | 4% | Cloudera |
| Customer service & success | – | – | 3 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Administration & office | – | – | 2 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Finance & accounting | – | – | 2 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using Apache Beam →
Companies using Cloudera →
distributed processing ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
Cloudera is named by 142 companies in job postings and Apache Beam by 178; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/apache-beam-vs-cloudera)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
Apache Beam vs Cloudera: questions
Which is more used, Apache Beam or Cloudera?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, Apache Beam (178) over Cloudera (142). By website-and-DNS footprint, Cloudera (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses Apache Beam?
41% of Apache Beam companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 44% for Cloudera. 34% of Apache Beam companies have over 1,000 employees, against 37% for Cloudera.
Do companies run both?
0 companies name both in their postings, usually Apache Beam in marketing and Cloudera in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on Apache Beam or Cloudera. Start free, no card.