Apache Camel VS Celigo
As of 30 October 2026, Celigo is named by 129 companies and Apache Camel by 172; Apache Camel skews to companies under 200 people (40% vs 41%), Celigo to companies over 1,000 (19% vs 37%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Apache Camel's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Celigo rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- Apache Camel: 2–200 employees
- 40%
- Celigo: 2–200 employees
- 41%
- Apache Camel: 1,000+ employees
- 37%
- Celigo: 1,000+ employees
- 19%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 2.2 · 1.5
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | Apache Camel | share | Celigo | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 3 | 2% | 2 | 2% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 7 | 4% | 4 | 3% | even |
| 11-50 employees | 24 | 14% | 12 | 9% | Apache Camel |
| 51-200 employees | 38 | 22% | 37 | 29% | Celigo |
| 201-500 employees | 28 | 16% | 31 | 24% | Celigo |
| 501-1000 employees | 9 | 5% | 18 | 14% | Celigo |
| 1001-5000 employees | 33 | 19% | 20 | 16% | Apache Camel |
| 5001-10000 employees | 11 | 6% | 3 | 2% | Apache Camel |
| 10,001+ employees | 19 | 11% | 2 | 2% | Apache Camel |
| Segment | Apache Camel | share | Celigo | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology & software | 99 | 58% | 56 | 43% | Apache Camel |
| Business & finance services | 39 | 23% | 18 | 14% | Apache Camel |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 7 | 4% | 5 | 4% | even |
| Public, community & associations | 6 | 3% | 4 | 3% | even |
| Manufacturing & industry | 6 | 3% | 20 | 16% | Celigo |
| Media & content | 4 | 2% | 3 | 2% | even |
| Commerce & trade | 3 | 2% | 12 | 9% | Celigo |
| Consumer services & leisure | 3 | 2% | 3 | 2% | even |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 3 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Health care | 1 | 1% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Hospitality & travel | 1 | 1% | 2 | 2% | even |
| Automotive | – | – | 3 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Property & construction | – | – | 2 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Apache Camel | share | Celigo | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 70 | 41% | 107 | 83% | Celigo |
| India | 10 | 6% | 1 | 1% | Apache Camel |
| Belgium | 8 | 5% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Germany | 8 | 5% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| United Kingdom | 8 | 5% | 5 | 4% | even |
| Netherlands | 8 | 5% | 2 | 2% | Apache Camel |
| Canada | 7 | 4% | 5 | 4% | even |
| Switzerland | 7 | 4% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| France | 7 | 4% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Poland | 5 | 3% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Sweden | 5 | 3% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Australia | 3 | 2% | 2 | 2% | even |
| United Arab Emirates | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Austria | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Czechia | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Finland | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| MK | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Mexico | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Apache Camel | share | Celigo | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Software engineering | 562 | 77% | 42 | 16% | Apache Camel |
| IT operations & business systems | 54 | 7% | 118 | 46% | Celigo |
| Data & AI | 15 | 2% | 23 | 9% | Celigo |
| Product, program & project management | 7 | 1% | 20 | 8% | Celigo |
| Engineering (non-software) | 5 | 1% | 4 | 2% | even |
| Sales | 4 | 1% | 11 | 4% | Celigo |
| Unclassified | 4 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Finance & accounting | – | – | 4 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| General management & consulting | – | – | 3 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Customer service & success | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Human resources | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Logistics warehouse and transport | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Retail & store operations | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using Apache Camel →
Companies using Celigo →
ipaas enterprise integration ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
Celigo is named by 129 companies in job postings and Apache Camel by 172; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/apache-camel-vs-celigo)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
Apache Camel vs Celigo: questions
Which is more used, Apache Camel or Celigo?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, Apache Camel (172) over Celigo (129). By website-and-DNS footprint, Celigo (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses Apache Camel?
40% of Apache Camel companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 41% for Celigo. 37% of Apache Camel companies have over 1,000 employees, against 19% for Celigo.
Do companies run both?
0 companies name both in their postings, usually Apache Camel in marketing and Celigo in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on Apache Camel or Celigo. Start free, no card.