Apache Hive VS Trino
As of 30 October 2026, Trino is named by 246 companies and Apache Hive by 606; Apache Hive skews to companies under 200 people (42% vs 34%), Trino to companies over 1,000 (38% vs 37%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Apache Hive's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Trino rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- Apache Hive: 2–200 employees
- 42%
- Trino: 2–200 employees
- 34%
- Apache Hive: 1,000+ employees
- 37%
- Trino: 1,000+ employees
- 38%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 3.2 · 3.0
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | Apache Hive | share | Trino | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 10 | 2% | 3 | 1% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 32 | 5% | 10 | 4% | even |
| 11-50 employees | 90 | 15% | 30 | 12% | Apache Hive |
| 51-200 employees | 131 | 22% | 43 | 17% | Apache Hive |
| 201-500 employees | 62 | 10% | 37 | 15% | Trino |
| 501-1000 employees | 54 | 9% | 29 | 12% | Trino |
| 1001-5000 employees | 85 | 14% | 50 | 20% | Trino |
| 5001-10000 employees | 37 | 6% | 13 | 5% | even |
| 10,001+ employees | 105 | 17% | 31 | 13% | Apache Hive |
| Segment | Apache Hive | share | Trino | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology & software | 334 | 55% | 141 | 57% | Trino |
| Business & finance services | 127 | 21% | 50 | 20% | even |
| Manufacturing & industry | 34 | 6% | 20 | 8% | Trino |
| Media & content | 28 | 5% | 12 | 5% | even |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 15 | 2% | 4 | 2% | even |
| Consumer services & leisure | 14 | 2% | 4 | 2% | even |
| Commerce & trade | 13 | 2% | 5 | 2% | even |
| Public, community & associations | 11 | 2% | 4 | 2% | even |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 7 | 1% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Automotive | 6 | 1% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Hospitality & travel | 6 | 1% | 4 | 2% | even |
| Health care | 5 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Apache Hive | share | Trino | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 396 | 65% | 172 | 70% | Trino |
| United Kingdom | 35 | 6% | 10 | 4% | even |
| India | 32 | 5% | 6 | 2% | Apache Hive |
| France | 19 | 3% | 5 | 2% | even |
| Singapore | 14 | 2% | 7 | 3% | even |
| Canada | 10 | 2% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Spain | 9 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Brazil | 8 | 1% | 4 | 2% | even |
| Germany | 8 | 1% | 11 | 4% | Trino |
| United Arab Emirates | 6 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Poland | 6 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Switzerland | 5 | 1% | 3 | 1% | even |
| Austria | – | – | 3 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Greece | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Netherlands | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Apache Hive | share | Trino | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Data & AI | 2,264 | 65% | 492 | 50% | Apache Hive |
| Software engineering | 517 | 15% | 264 | 27% | Trino |
| IT operations & business systems | 150 | 4% | 26 | 3% | even |
| Product, program & project management | 37 | 1% | 17 | 2% | even |
| General management & consulting | 32 | 1% | 3 | 0% | even |
| Sales | 24 | 1% | 14 | 1% | even |
| Engineering (non-software) | 23 | 1% | 10 | 1% | even |
| Legal, compliance & risk | 19 | 1% | 7 | 1% | even |
| Business development & strategy | 14 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Marketing & communications | 14 | 0% | 8 | 1% | even |
| Customer service & success | 12 | 0% | 3 | 0% | even |
| Construction and civil | 11 | 0% | 2 | 0% | even |
The companies behind each column
Companies using Apache Hive →
Companies using Trino →
distributed processing ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
Trino is named by 246 companies in job postings and Apache Hive by 606; 86 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/apache-hive-vs-trino)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
Apache Hive vs Trino: questions
Which is more used, Apache Hive or Trino?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, Apache Hive (606) over Trino (246). By website-and-DNS footprint, Trino (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses Apache Hive?
42% of Apache Hive companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 34% for Trino. 37% of Apache Hive companies have over 1,000 employees, against 38% for Trino.
Do companies run both?
86 companies name both in their postings, usually Apache Hive in marketing and Trino in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on Apache Hive or Trino. Start free, no card.