Breaknorm
Sign inStart free

Product

SignalsPeopleCompaniesLocal businessesMCP and API

Plays

Post engagersTeam build-outChampion movedHiring surgeNewly fundedLookalikesAll plays

Data

Coverage by countryHiring dataJob changesEmail verificationCompanies by toolWho is hiringMarket mapsOutboundCompany profilesCompare
PricingDatasetsDocsSign in
Compare · distributed processing

Apache Pig VS Kafka Streams

As of 30 October 2026, Kafka Streams is named by 109 companies and Apache Pig by 121; Apache Pig skews to companies under 200 people (54% vs 32%), Kafka Streams to companies over 1,000 (39% vs 26%).

As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.

The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Apache Pig's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Kafka Streams rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.

Apache Pig: 2–200 employees
54%
Kafka Streams: 2–200 employees
32%
Apache Pig: 1,000+ employees
26%
Kafka Streams: 1,000+ employees
39%
Postings per company, 90 days
1.8 · 2.7
Website or DNS footprint
0 · 0
121companies name Apache Pig
109companies name Kafka Streams
0name both
221 · 296postings in 90 days, Apache Pig · Kafka Streams
02Side by side

Who chooses which

Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.

By company size
SegmentApache PigshareKafka StreamsshareLeans
Self-employed43%––outside top 12
2-10 employees43%66%Kafka Streams
11-50 employees2722%109%Apache Pig
51-200 employees3428%1917%Apache Pig
201-500 employees119%1413%Kafka Streams
501-1000 employees97%1716%Kafka Streams
1001-5000 employees1311%1514%Kafka Streams
5001-10000 employees22%98%Kafka Streams
10,001+ employees1714%1917%Kafka Streams
By industry
SegmentApache PigshareKafka StreamsshareLeans
Technology & software7764%6156%Apache Pig
Business & finance services2017%2220%Kafka Streams
Manufacturing & industry1210%66%Apache Pig
Consumer services & leisure43%11%Apache Pig
Public, community & associations32%––outside top 12
Health care11%11%even
Hospitality & travel11%44%Kafka Streams
Media & content11%22%even
Transport, logistics & rental11%22%even
Utilities & infrastructure11%33%even
Commerce & trade––44%outside top 12
Automotive––33%outside top 12
By country
SegmentApache PigshareKafka StreamsshareLeans
United States8570%7064%Apache Pig
United Kingdom65%98%Kafka Streams
France54%22%Apache Pig
India43%44%even
Belgium22%––outside top 12
Canada22%––outside top 12
Switzerland22%––outside top 12
Germany22%44%Kafka Streams
Italy22%––outside top 12
Singapore22%––outside top 12
Australia11%33%even
Colombia11%––outside top 12
Brazil––22%outside top 12
Japan––22%outside top 12
Poland––22%outside top 12
Sweden––22%outside top 12
United Arab Emirates––11%outside top 12
Austria––11%outside top 12
Postings by team (share of each tool's postings)
SegmentApache PigshareKafka StreamsshareLeans
Data & AI58969%10629%Apache Pig
Software engineering13416%19152%Kafka Streams
IT operations & business systems182%113%even
Engineering (non-software)40%134%Kafka Streams
Education & training20%––outside top 12
Marketing & communications20%––outside top 12
Product, program & project management20%10%even
Legal, compliance & risk10%––outside top 12
Research and science10%––outside top 12
Sales10%––outside top 12
Unclassified10%––outside top 12
Logistics warehouse and transport––31%outside top 12
Cite this

Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.

Kafka Streams is named by 109 companies in job postings and Apache Pig by 121; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/apache-pig-vs-kafka-streams)
How we know

Read from the source, not self-reported

Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →

  • Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
  • Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
  • SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
  • Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
FAQ

Apache Pig vs Kafka Streams: questions

Which is more used, Apache Pig or Kafka Streams?

By companies naming it in their own job postings, Apache Pig (121) over Kafka Streams (109). By website-and-DNS footprint, Kafka Streams (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.

Who chooses Apache Pig?

54% of Apache Pig companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 32% for Kafka Streams. 26% of Apache Pig companies have over 1,000 employees, against 39% for Kafka Streams.

Do companies run both?

0 companies name both in their postings, usually Apache Pig in marketing and Kafka Streams in sales, or during a migration.

Where do these numbers come from?

From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.

Companies and people

Get either list your way

The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.

Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it

Filter on Apache Pig or Kafka Streams. Start free, no card.

  1. 01Sign up, no card
  2. 02Connect Claude, ChatGPT or an API key
  3. 03Ask for your market