Apache Pig VS Trino
As of 30 October 2026, Trino is named by 246 companies and Apache Pig by 121; Apache Pig skews to companies under 200 people (54% vs 34%), Trino to companies over 1,000 (38% vs 26%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Apache Pig's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Trino rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- Apache Pig: 2–200 employees
- 54%
- Trino: 2–200 employees
- 34%
- Apache Pig: 1,000+ employees
- 26%
- Trino: 1,000+ employees
- 38%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 1.8 · 3.0
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | Apache Pig | share | Trino | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 4 | 3% | 3 | 1% | Apache Pig |
| 2-10 employees | 4 | 3% | 10 | 4% | even |
| 11-50 employees | 27 | 22% | 30 | 12% | Apache Pig |
| 51-200 employees | 34 | 28% | 43 | 17% | Apache Pig |
| 201-500 employees | 11 | 9% | 37 | 15% | Trino |
| 501-1000 employees | 9 | 7% | 29 | 12% | Trino |
| 1001-5000 employees | 13 | 11% | 50 | 20% | Trino |
| 5001-10000 employees | 2 | 2% | 13 | 5% | Trino |
| 10,001+ employees | 17 | 14% | 31 | 13% | even |
| Segment | Apache Pig | share | Trino | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology & software | 77 | 64% | 141 | 57% | Apache Pig |
| Business & finance services | 20 | 17% | 50 | 20% | Trino |
| Manufacturing & industry | 12 | 10% | 20 | 8% | even |
| Consumer services & leisure | 4 | 3% | 4 | 2% | even |
| Public, community & associations | 3 | 2% | 4 | 2% | even |
| Health care | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Hospitality & travel | 1 | 1% | 4 | 2% | even |
| Media & content | 1 | 1% | 12 | 5% | Trino |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 1 | 1% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 1 | 1% | 4 | 2% | even |
| Commerce & trade | – | – | 5 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Automotive | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Apache Pig | share | Trino | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 85 | 70% | 172 | 70% | even |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 5% | 10 | 4% | even |
| France | 5 | 4% | 5 | 2% | Apache Pig |
| India | 4 | 3% | 6 | 2% | even |
| Belgium | 2 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Canada | 2 | 2% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Switzerland | 2 | 2% | 3 | 1% | even |
| Germany | 2 | 2% | 11 | 4% | Trino |
| Italy | 2 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Singapore | 2 | 2% | 7 | 3% | even |
| Australia | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Colombia | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Brazil | – | – | 4 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Austria | – | – | 3 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Greece | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Netherlands | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Apache Pig | share | Trino | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Data & AI | 589 | 69% | 492 | 50% | Apache Pig |
| Software engineering | 134 | 16% | 264 | 27% | Trino |
| IT operations & business systems | 18 | 2% | 26 | 3% | even |
| Engineering (non-software) | 4 | 0% | 10 | 1% | even |
| Education & training | 2 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Marketing & communications | 2 | 0% | 8 | 1% | even |
| Product, program & project management | 2 | 0% | 17 | 2% | even |
| Legal, compliance & risk | 1 | 0% | 7 | 1% | even |
| Research and science | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Sales | 1 | 0% | 14 | 1% | even |
| Unclassified | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Customer service & success | – | – | 3 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| General management & consulting | – | – | 3 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Construction and civil | – | – | 2 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Business development & strategy | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using Apache Pig →
Companies using Trino →
distributed processing ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
Trino is named by 246 companies in job postings and Apache Pig by 121; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/apache-pig-vs-trino)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
Apache Pig vs Trino: questions
Which is more used, Apache Pig or Trino?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, Trino (246) over Apache Pig (121). By website-and-DNS footprint, Trino (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses Apache Pig?
54% of Apache Pig companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 34% for Trino. 26% of Apache Pig companies have over 1,000 employees, against 38% for Trino.
Do companies run both?
0 companies name both in their postings, usually Apache Pig in marketing and Trino in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on Apache Pig or Trino. Start free, no card.