Breaknorm
Sign inStart free

Product

SignalsPeopleCompaniesLocal businessesMCP and API

Plays

Post engagersTeam build-outChampion movedHiring surgeNewly fundedLookalikesAll plays

Data

Coverage by countryHiring dataJob changesEmail verificationCompanies by toolWho is hiringMarket mapsOutboundCompany profilesCompare
PricingDatasetsDocsSign in
Compare · message brokers streaming

Apache Pulsar VS Confluent

As of 30 October 2026, Confluent is named by 106 companies and Apache Pulsar by 131; Apache Pulsar skews to companies under 200 people (48% vs 38%), Confluent to companies over 1,000 (42% vs 34%).

As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.

The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Apache Pulsar's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Confluent rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.

Apache Pulsar: 2–200 employees
48%
Confluent: 2–200 employees
38%
Apache Pulsar: 1,000+ employees
34%
Confluent: 1,000+ employees
42%
Postings per company, 90 days
2.6 · 4.3
Website or DNS footprint
0 · 135
131companies name Apache Pulsar
106companies name Confluent
0name both
347 · 459postings in 90 days, Apache Pulsar · Confluent
02Side by side

Who chooses which

Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.

By company size
SegmentApache PulsarshareConfluentshareLeans
Self-employed22%––outside top 12
2-10 employees1310%22%Apache Pulsar
11-50 employees2217%1413%Apache Pulsar
51-200 employees2821%2423%even
201-500 employees97%109%Confluent
501-1000 employees1310%1110%even
1001-5000 employees1814%1918%Confluent
5001-10000 employees86%66%even
10,001+ employees1814%2019%Confluent
By industry
SegmentApache PulsarshareConfluentshareLeans
Technology & software6449%5047%even
Business & finance services3728%3230%even
Manufacturing & industry75%66%even
Media & content75%33%Apache Pulsar
Utilities & infrastructure43%33%even
Commerce & trade32%22%even
Automotive22%22%even
Consumer services & leisure22%44%Confluent
Transport, logistics & rental22%11%even
Public, community & associations11%––outside top 12
Health care11%22%even
Property & construction11%––outside top 12
Hospitality & travel––11%outside top 12
By country
SegmentApache PulsarshareConfluentshareLeans
United States9270%6359%Apache Pulsar
United Kingdom75%1615%Confluent
Portugal54%––outside top 12
Germany32%33%even
France32%66%Confluent
Belgium22%––outside top 12
Canada22%11%even
India22%22%even
Netherlands22%––outside top 12
Argentina11%11%even
Austria11%––outside top 12
Australia11%33%Confluent
United Arab Emirates––22%outside top 12
Spain––22%outside top 12
Sweden––22%outside top 12
Brazil––11%outside top 12
Postings by team (share of each tool's postings)
SegmentApache PulsarshareConfluentshareLeans
Software engineering25654%24145%Apache Pulsar
Data & AI9119%9618%even
Engineering (non-software)357%61%Apache Pulsar
IT operations & business systems194%8115%Confluent
Marketing & communications71%––outside top 12
Product, program & project management51%132%even
Sales51%112%even
Logistics warehouse and transport31%––outside top 12
Business development & strategy20%––outside top 12
Customer service & success20%82%even
General management & consulting20%––outside top 12
Manufacturing and production20%––outside top 12
Procurement and purchasing––31%outside top 12
Finance & accounting––20%outside top 12
Human resources––20%outside top 12
Administration & office––10%outside top 12
Construction and civil––10%outside top 12
Cite this

Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.

Confluent is named by 106 companies in job postings and Apache Pulsar by 131; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/apache-pulsar-vs-confluent)
How we know

Read from the source, not self-reported

Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →

  • Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
  • Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
  • SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
  • Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
FAQ

Apache Pulsar vs Confluent: questions

Which is more used, Apache Pulsar or Confluent?

By companies naming it in their own job postings, Apache Pulsar (131) over Confluent (106). By website-and-DNS footprint, Confluent (135 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.

Who chooses Apache Pulsar?

48% of Apache Pulsar companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 38% for Confluent. 34% of Apache Pulsar companies have over 1,000 employees, against 42% for Confluent.

Do companies run both?

0 companies name both in their postings, usually Apache Pulsar in marketing and Confluent in sales, or during a migration.

Where do these numbers come from?

From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.

Companies and people

Get either list your way

The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.

Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it

Filter on Apache Pulsar or Confluent. Start free, no card.

  1. 01Sign up, no card
  2. 02Connect Claude, ChatGPT or an API key
  3. 03Ask for your market