Apache Subversion VS CVS
As of 30 October 2026, CVS is named by 140 companies and Apache Subversion by 1,086; Apache Subversion skews to companies under 200 people (53% vs 52%), CVS to companies over 1,000 (27% vs 26%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Apache Subversion's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, CVS rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- Apache Subversion: 2–200 employees
- 53%
- CVS: 2–200 employees
- 52%
- Apache Subversion: 1,000+ employees
- 26%
- CVS: 1,000+ employees
- 27%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 2.3 · 2.8
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | Apache Subversion | share | CVS | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 5 | 0% | 1 | 1% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 76 | 7% | 9 | 6% | even |
| 11-50 employees | 267 | 25% | 33 | 24% | even |
| 51-200 employees | 236 | 22% | 31 | 22% | even |
| 201-500 employees | 136 | 13% | 16 | 11% | even |
| 501-1000 employees | 79 | 7% | 12 | 9% | even |
| 1001-5000 employees | 132 | 12% | 17 | 12% | even |
| 5001-10000 employees | 42 | 4% | 3 | 2% | even |
| 10,001+ employees | 113 | 10% | 18 | 13% | CVS |
| Segment | Apache Subversion | share | CVS | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology & software | 543 | 50% | 69 | 49% | even |
| Business & finance services | 201 | 19% | 22 | 16% | Apache Subversion |
| Manufacturing & industry | 179 | 16% | 23 | 16% | even |
| Media & content | 40 | 4% | 5 | 4% | even |
| Consumer services & leisure | 25 | 2% | 3 | 2% | even |
| Automotive | 21 | 2% | 3 | 2% | even |
| Public, community & associations | 18 | 2% | 3 | 2% | even |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 18 | 2% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Property & construction | 12 | 1% | 4 | 3% | even |
| Commerce & trade | 11 | 1% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 10 | 1% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Health care | 6 | 1% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Segment | Apache Subversion | share | CVS | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 598 | 55% | 87 | 62% | CVS |
| India | 90 | 8% | 17 | 12% | CVS |
| Germany | 64 | 6% | 4 | 3% | Apache Subversion |
| United Kingdom | 64 | 6% | 4 | 3% | Apache Subversion |
| France | 35 | 3% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Canada | 27 | 2% | 6 | 4% | even |
| Italy | 21 | 2% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Australia | 15 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Poland | 13 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Belgium | 9 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Spain | 9 | 1% | 3 | 2% | even |
| Sweden | 9 | 1% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Brazil | – | – | 3 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Lithuania | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Switzerland | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Apache Subversion | share | CVS | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Software engineering | 3,283 | 69% | 404 | 53% | Apache Subversion |
| Engineering (non-software) | 431 | 9% | 38 | 5% | Apache Subversion |
| IT operations & business systems | 245 | 5% | 46 | 6% | even |
| Data & AI | 129 | 3% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Product, program & project management | 39 | 1% | 7 | 1% | even |
| Administration & office | 31 | 1% | 5 | 1% | even |
| Arts media and entertainment | 17 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Design & UX | 16 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Marketing & communications | 13 | 0% | 7 | 1% | even |
| Quality, safety & environment | 13 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Customer service & success | 11 | 0% | 28 | 4% | CVS |
| Finance & accounting | 11 | 0% | 11 | 1% | even |
| Healthcare clinical | – | – | 85 | 11% | outside top 12 |
| Sales | – | – | 9 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Research and science | – | – | 6 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Unclassified | – | – | 6 | 1% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using Apache Subversion →
Companies using CVS →
version control code hosting ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
CVS is named by 140 companies in job postings and Apache Subversion by 1,086; 159 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/apache-subversion-vs-cvs)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
Apache Subversion vs CVS: questions
Which is more used, Apache Subversion or CVS?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, Apache Subversion (1,086) over CVS (140). By website-and-DNS footprint, CVS (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses Apache Subversion?
53% of Apache Subversion companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 52% for CVS. 26% of Apache Subversion companies have over 1,000 employees, against 27% for CVS.
Do companies run both?
159 companies name both in their postings, usually Apache Subversion in marketing and CVS in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on Apache Subversion or CVS. Start free, no card.