Breaknorm
Sign inStart free

Product

SignalsPeopleCompaniesLocal businessesMCP and API

Plays

Post engagersTeam build-outChampion movedHiring surgeNewly fundedLookalikesAll plays

Data

Coverage by countryHiring dataJob changesEmail verificationCompanies by toolWho is hiringMarket mapsOutboundCompany profilesCompare
PricingDatasetsDocsSign in
Compare · low code bpm rpa

Appian VS FileMaker

As of 30 October 2026, FileMaker is named by 100 companies and Appian by 152; Appian skews to companies under 200 people (37% vs 49%), FileMaker to companies over 1,000 (27% vs 43%).

As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.

The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Appian's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, FileMaker rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.

Appian: 2–200 employees
37%
FileMaker: 2–200 employees
49%
Appian: 1,000+ employees
43%
FileMaker: 1,000+ employees
27%
Postings per company, 90 days
4.2 · 2.3
Website or DNS footprint
0 · 0
152companies name Appian
100companies name FileMaker
0name both
634 · 228postings in 90 days, Appian · FileMaker
02Side by side

Who chooses which

Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.

By company size
SegmentAppianshareFileMakershareLeans
Self-employed32%––outside top 12
2-10 employees96%1212%FileMaker
11-50 employees2416%2020%FileMaker
51-200 employees2315%1717%even
201-500 employees149%1313%FileMaker
501-1000 employees139%1111%FileMaker
1001-5000 employees2818%88%Appian
5001-10000 employees149%77%Appian
10,001+ employees2416%1212%Appian
By industry
SegmentAppianshareFileMakershareLeans
Technology & software6039%1212%Appian
Business & finance services4630%88%Appian
Manufacturing & industry117%1515%FileMaker
Media & content107%1010%FileMaker
Commerce & trade43%44%even
Health care43%99%FileMaker
Transport, logistics & rental43%––outside top 12
Utilities & infrastructure43%33%even
Public, community & associations32%1919%FileMaker
Automotive21%22%even
Consumer services & leisure21%99%FileMaker
Property & construction21%66%FileMaker
Hospitality & travel––22%outside top 12
By country
SegmentAppianshareFileMakershareLeans
United States9563%7676%FileMaker
United Kingdom117%22%Appian
Germany96%55%even
Canada75%66%even
Spain75%––outside top 12
Australia32%11%even
Switzerland32%––outside top 12
India32%––outside top 12
Italy32%33%even
Denmark21%11%even
France21%11%even
Romania21%––outside top 12
Sweden––22%outside top 12
Belgium––11%outside top 12
Netherlands––11%outside top 12
Postings by team (share of each tool's postings)
SegmentAppianshareFileMakershareLeans
Software engineering37342%237%Appian
IT operations & business systems13115%124%Appian
General management & consulting455%––outside top 12
Product, program & project management384%237%FileMaker
Data & AI283%––outside top 12
Engineering (non-software)273%––outside top 12
Finance & accounting162%134%FileMaker
Sales142%103%even
Legal, compliance & risk81%––outside top 12
Logistics warehouse and transport51%175%FileMaker
Unclassified51%––outside top 12
Customer service & success40%––outside top 12
Administration & office––309%outside top 12
Research and science––155%outside top 12
Arts media and entertainment––113%outside top 12
Quality, safety & environment––103%outside top 12
Education & training––62%outside top 12
Manufacturing and production––62%outside top 12
Cite this

Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.

FileMaker is named by 100 companies in job postings and Appian by 152; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/appian-vs-filemaker)
How we know

Read from the source, not self-reported

Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →

  • Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
  • Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
  • SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
  • Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
FAQ

Appian vs FileMaker: questions

Which is more used, Appian or FileMaker?

By companies naming it in their own job postings, Appian (152) over FileMaker (100). By website-and-DNS footprint, FileMaker (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.

Who chooses Appian?

37% of Appian companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 49% for FileMaker. 43% of Appian companies have over 1,000 employees, against 27% for FileMaker.

Do companies run both?

0 companies name both in their postings, usually Appian in marketing and FileMaker in sales, or during a migration.

Where do these numbers come from?

From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.

Companies and people

Get either list your way

The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.

Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it

Filter on Appian or FileMaker. Start free, no card.

  1. 01Sign up, no card
  2. 02Connect Claude, ChatGPT or an API key
  3. 03Ask for your market