Breaknorm
Sign inStart free

Product

SignalsPeopleCompaniesLocal businessesMCP and API

Plays

Post engagersTeam build-outChampion movedHiring surgeNewly fundedLookalikesAll plays

Data

Coverage by countryHiring dataJob changesEmail verificationCompanies by toolWho is hiringMarket mapsOutboundCompany profilesCompare
PricingDatasetsDocsSign in
Compare · low code bpm rpa

Appian VS Microsoft AI Builder

As of 30 October 2026, Microsoft AI Builder is named by 116 companies and Appian by 152; Appian skews to companies under 200 people (37% vs 30%), Microsoft AI Builder to companies over 1,000 (46% vs 43%).

As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.

The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Appian's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Microsoft AI Builder rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.

Appian: 2–200 employees
37%
Microsoft AI Builder: 2–200 employees
30%
Appian: 1,000+ employees
43%
Microsoft AI Builder: 1,000+ employees
46%
Postings per company, 90 days
4.2 · 2.3
Website or DNS footprint
0 · 0
152companies name Appian
116companies name Microsoft AI Builder
0name both
634 · 266postings in 90 days, Appian · Microsoft AI Builder
02Side by side

Who chooses which

Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.

By company size
SegmentAppianshareMicrosoft AI BuildershareLeans
Self-employed32%––outside top 12
2-10 employees96%43%Appian
11-50 employees2416%1311%Appian
51-200 employees2315%1816%even
201-500 employees149%1614%Microsoft AI Builder
501-1000 employees139%1210%even
1001-5000 employees2818%2219%even
5001-10000 employees149%87%Appian
10,001+ employees2416%2320%Microsoft AI Builder
By industry
SegmentAppianshareMicrosoft AI BuildershareLeans
Technology & software6039%5346%Microsoft AI Builder
Business & finance services4630%2118%Appian
Manufacturing & industry117%1412%Microsoft AI Builder
Media & content107%11%Appian
Commerce & trade43%76%Microsoft AI Builder
Health care43%––outside top 12
Transport, logistics & rental43%22%even
Utilities & infrastructure43%43%even
Public, community & associations32%22%even
Automotive21%––outside top 12
Consumer services & leisure21%43%Microsoft AI Builder
Property & construction21%65%Microsoft AI Builder
Hospitality & travel––22%outside top 12
By country
SegmentAppianshareMicrosoft AI BuildershareLeans
United States9563%6153%Appian
United Kingdom117%65%Appian
Germany96%65%even
Canada75%98%Microsoft AI Builder
Spain75%33%Appian
Australia32%43%even
Switzerland32%22%even
India32%76%Microsoft AI Builder
Italy32%––outside top 12
Denmark21%––outside top 12
France21%22%even
Romania21%––outside top 12
Netherlands––22%outside top 12
Portugal––22%outside top 12
United Arab Emirates––11%outside top 12
Postings by team (share of each tool's postings)
SegmentAppianshareMicrosoft AI BuildershareLeans
Software engineering37342%20645%Microsoft AI Builder
IT operations & business systems13115%11024%Microsoft AI Builder
General management & consulting455%61%Appian
Product, program & project management384%102%Appian
Data & AI283%388%Microsoft AI Builder
Engineering (non-software)273%82%even
Finance & accounting162%20%even
Sales142%31%even
Legal, compliance & risk81%––outside top 12
Logistics warehouse and transport51%51%even
Unclassified51%––outside top 12
Customer service & success40%––outside top 12
Design & UX––31%outside top 12
Human resources––20%outside top 12
Quality, safety & environment––20%outside top 12
Cite this

Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.

Microsoft AI Builder is named by 116 companies in job postings and Appian by 152; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/appian-vs-microsoft-ai-builder)
How we know

Read from the source, not self-reported

Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →

  • Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
  • Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
  • SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
  • Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
FAQ

Appian vs Microsoft AI Builder: questions

Which is more used, Appian or Microsoft AI Builder?

By companies naming it in their own job postings, Appian (152) over Microsoft AI Builder (116). By website-and-DNS footprint, Microsoft AI Builder (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.

Who chooses Appian?

37% of Appian companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 30% for Microsoft AI Builder. 43% of Appian companies have over 1,000 employees, against 46% for Microsoft AI Builder.

Do companies run both?

0 companies name both in their postings, usually Appian in marketing and Microsoft AI Builder in sales, or during a migration.

Where do these numbers come from?

From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.

Companies and people

Get either list your way

The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.

Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it

Filter on Appian or Microsoft AI Builder. Start free, no card.

  1. 01Sign up, no card
  2. 02Connect Claude, ChatGPT or an API key
  3. 03Ask for your market