Breaknorm
Sign inStart free

Product

SignalsPeopleCompaniesLocal businessesMCP and API

Plays

Post engagersTeam build-outChampion movedHiring surgeNewly fundedLookalikesAll plays

Data

Coverage by countryHiring dataJob changesEmail verificationCompanies by toolWho is hiringMarket mapsOutboundCompany profilesCompare
PricingDatasetsDocsSign in
Compare · low code bpm rpa

Appian VS Microsoft Power Platform

As of 30 October 2026, Microsoft Power Platform is named by 2,289 companies and Appian by 152; Appian skews to companies under 200 people (37% vs 28%), Microsoft Power Platform to companies over 1,000 (45% vs 43%).

As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.

The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Appian's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Microsoft Power Platform rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.

Appian: 2–200 employees
37%
Microsoft Power Platform: 2–200 employees
28%
Appian: 1,000+ employees
43%
Microsoft Power Platform: 1,000+ employees
45%
Postings per company, 90 days
4.2 · 3.9
Website or DNS footprint
0 · 0
152companies name Appian
2,289companies name Microsoft Power Platform
47name both
634 · 8,861postings in 90 days, Appian · Microsoft Power Platform
02Side by side

Who chooses which

Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.

By company size
SegmentAppianshareMicrosoft Power PlatformshareLeans
Self-employed32%110%even
2-10 employees96%793%Appian
11-50 employees2416%2069%Appian
51-200 employees2315%35816%even
201-500 employees149%33715%Microsoft Power Platform
501-1000 employees139%26812%Microsoft Power Platform
1001-5000 employees2818%46820%Microsoft Power Platform
5001-10000 employees149%1527%Appian
10,001+ employees2416%41018%Microsoft Power Platform
By industry
SegmentAppianshareMicrosoft Power PlatformshareLeans
Technology & software6039%61227%Appian
Business & finance services4630%53423%Appian
Manufacturing & industry117%43719%Microsoft Power Platform
Media & content107%362%Appian
Commerce & trade43%904%even
Health care43%643%even
Transport, logistics & rental43%492%even
Utilities & infrastructure43%1155%Microsoft Power Platform
Public, community & associations32%803%even
Automotive21%542%even
Consumer services & leisure21%723%even
Property & construction21%1195%Microsoft Power Platform
By country
SegmentAppianshareMicrosoft Power PlatformshareLeans
United States9563%1,13249%Appian
United Kingdom117%1928%even
Germany96%2119%Microsoft Power Platform
Canada75%994%even
Spain75%331%Appian
Australia32%743%even
Switzerland32%372%even
India32%462%even
Italy32%––outside top 12
Denmark21%281%even
France21%763%Microsoft Power Platform
Romania21%––outside top 12
Netherlands––532%outside top 12
Belgium––321%outside top 12
Postings by team (share of each tool's postings)
SegmentAppianshareMicrosoft Power PlatformshareLeans
Software engineering37342%2,63025%Appian
IT operations & business systems13115%3,09629%Microsoft Power Platform
General management & consulting455%2652%Appian
Product, program & project management384%3904%even
Data & AI283%1,15111%Microsoft Power Platform
Engineering (non-software)273%1842%even
Finance & accounting162%2382%even
Sales142%2092%even
Legal, compliance & risk81%500%even
Logistics warehouse and transport51%––outside top 12
Unclassified51%––outside top 12
Customer service & success40%––outside top 12
Quality, safety & environment––651%outside top 12
Business development & strategy––520%outside top 12
Human resources––490%outside top 12
Cite this

Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.

Microsoft Power Platform is named by 2,289 companies in job postings and Appian by 152; 47 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/appian-vs-microsoft-power-platform)
How we know

Read from the source, not self-reported

Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →

  • Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
  • Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
  • SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
  • Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
FAQ

Appian vs Microsoft Power Platform: questions

Which is more used, Appian or Microsoft Power Platform?

By companies naming it in their own job postings, Microsoft Power Platform (2,289) over Appian (152). By website-and-DNS footprint, Microsoft Power Platform (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.

Who chooses Appian?

37% of Appian companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 28% for Microsoft Power Platform. 43% of Appian companies have over 1,000 employees, against 45% for Microsoft Power Platform.

Do companies run both?

47 companies name both in their postings, usually Appian in marketing and Microsoft Power Platform in sales, or during a migration.

Where do these numbers come from?

From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.

Companies and people

Get either list your way

The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.

Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it

Filter on Appian or Microsoft Power Platform. Start free, no card.

  1. 01Sign up, no card
  2. 02Connect Claude, ChatGPT or an API key
  3. 03Ask for your market