Core ML VS Hugging Face PEFT
As of 30 October 2026, Hugging Face PEFT is named by 155 companies and Core ML by 166; Core ML skews to companies under 200 people (49% vs 46%), Hugging Face PEFT to companies over 1,000 (36% vs 27%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Core ML's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Hugging Face PEFT rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- Core ML: 2–200 employees
- 49%
- Hugging Face PEFT: 2–200 employees
- 46%
- Core ML: 1,000+ employees
- 27%
- Hugging Face PEFT: 1,000+ employees
- 36%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 2.3 · 2.8
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | Core ML | share | Hugging Face PEFT | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 5 | 3% | 1 | 1% | Core ML |
| 2-10 employees | 18 | 11% | 15 | 10% | even |
| 11-50 employees | 33 | 20% | 24 | 15% | Core ML |
| 51-200 employees | 30 | 18% | 32 | 21% | Hugging Face PEFT |
| 201-500 employees | 21 | 13% | 16 | 10% | Core ML |
| 501-1000 employees | 15 | 9% | 11 | 7% | even |
| 1001-5000 employees | 21 | 13% | 29 | 19% | Hugging Face PEFT |
| 5001-10000 employees | 6 | 4% | 11 | 7% | Hugging Face PEFT |
| 10,001+ employees | 17 | 10% | 16 | 10% | even |
| Segment | Core ML | share | Hugging Face PEFT | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology & software | 92 | 55% | 104 | 67% | Hugging Face PEFT |
| Business & finance services | 33 | 20% | 24 | 15% | Core ML |
| Manufacturing & industry | 17 | 10% | 6 | 4% | Core ML |
| Consumer services & leisure | 7 | 4% | 2 | 1% | Core ML |
| Media & content | 4 | 2% | 6 | 4% | even |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 4 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Public, community & associations | 3 | 2% | 5 | 3% | even |
| Automotive | 2 | 1% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Commerce & trade | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Health care | 1 | 1% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Hospitality & travel | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Utilities & infrastructure | – | – | 5 | 3% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Core ML | share | Hugging Face PEFT | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 105 | 63% | 105 | 68% | Hugging Face PEFT |
| United Kingdom | 21 | 13% | 12 | 8% | Core ML |
| India | 11 | 7% | 7 | 5% | Core ML |
| Canada | 5 | 3% | 1 | 1% | Core ML |
| Germany | 4 | 2% | 3 | 2% | even |
| Italy | 3 | 2% | 3 | 2% | even |
| Lithuania | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Sweden | 2 | 1% | 4 | 3% | even |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Austria | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% | 4 | 3% | even |
| Cyprus | 1 | 1% | 1 | 1% | even |
| France | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Singapore | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Australia | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Core ML | share | Hugging Face PEFT | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Data & AI | 277 | 55% | 464 | 85% | Hugging Face PEFT |
| Software engineering | 152 | 30% | 38 | 7% | Core ML |
| IT operations & business systems | 21 | 4% | 2 | 0% | Core ML |
| Product, program & project management | 11 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Engineering (non-software) | 4 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Arts media and entertainment | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Customer service & success | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Human resources | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Legal, compliance & risk | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Unclassified | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| General management & consulting | – | – | 2 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Education & training | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Research and science | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using Core ML →
Companies using Hugging Face PEFT →
ml frameworks ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
Hugging Face PEFT is named by 155 companies in job postings and Core ML by 166; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/apple-core-ml-vs-hugging-face-peft)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
Core ML vs Hugging Face PEFT: questions
Which is more used, Core ML or Hugging Face PEFT?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, Core ML (166) over Hugging Face PEFT (155). By website-and-DNS footprint, Hugging Face PEFT (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses Core ML?
49% of Core ML companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 46% for Hugging Face PEFT. 27% of Core ML companies have over 1,000 employees, against 36% for Hugging Face PEFT.
Do companies run both?
0 companies name both in their postings, usually Core ML in marketing and Hugging Face PEFT in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on Core ML or Hugging Face PEFT. Start free, no card.