ArcGIS Pro VS GDAL
As of 30 October 2026, GDAL is named by 108 companies and ArcGIS Pro by 399; ArcGIS Pro skews to companies under 200 people (34% vs 66%), GDAL to companies over 1,000 (21% vs 36%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: ArcGIS Pro's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, GDAL rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- ArcGIS Pro: 2–200 employees
- 34%
- GDAL: 2–200 employees
- 66%
- ArcGIS Pro: 1,000+ employees
- 36%
- GDAL: 1,000+ employees
- 21%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 2.7 · 1.6
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | ArcGIS Pro | share | GDAL | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 1 | 0% | 1 | 1% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 22 | 6% | 10 | 9% | GDAL |
| 11-50 employees | 37 | 9% | 22 | 20% | GDAL |
| 51-200 employees | 78 | 20% | 39 | 36% | GDAL |
| 201-500 employees | 71 | 18% | 6 | 6% | ArcGIS Pro |
| 501-1000 employees | 46 | 12% | 7 | 6% | ArcGIS Pro |
| 1001-5000 employees | 85 | 21% | 12 | 11% | ArcGIS Pro |
| 5001-10000 employees | 24 | 6% | 3 | 3% | ArcGIS Pro |
| 10,001+ employees | 35 | 9% | 8 | 7% | even |
| Segment | ArcGIS Pro | share | GDAL | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business & finance services | 164 | 41% | 36 | 33% | ArcGIS Pro |
| Public, community & associations | 58 | 15% | 5 | 5% | ArcGIS Pro |
| Property & construction | 44 | 11% | 3 | 3% | ArcGIS Pro |
| Technology & software | 44 | 11% | 39 | 36% | GDAL |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 38 | 10% | 3 | 3% | ArcGIS Pro |
| Manufacturing & industry | 23 | 6% | 12 | 11% | GDAL |
| Consumer services & leisure | 8 | 2% | 4 | 4% | even |
| Media & content | 7 | 2% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 6 | 2% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Agriculture & forestry | 4 | 1% | 3 | 3% | even |
| Commerce & trade | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Hospitality & travel | 1 | 0% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Segment | ArcGIS Pro | share | GDAL | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 282 | 71% | 62 | 57% | ArcGIS Pro |
| Canada | 26 | 7% | 5 | 5% | even |
| United Kingdom | 24 | 6% | 7 | 6% | even |
| France | 13 | 3% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Australia | 10 | 3% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Germany | 10 | 3% | 5 | 5% | GDAL |
| Netherlands | 9 | 2% | 2 | 2% | even |
| Italy | 3 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Belgium | 2 | 1% | 3 | 3% | GDAL |
| Denmark | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Spain | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Greece | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Switzerland | – | – | 3 | 3% | outside top 12 |
| Poland | – | – | 3 | 3% | outside top 12 |
| Sweden | – | – | 2 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| United Arab Emirates | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Austria | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Brazil | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | ArcGIS Pro | share | GDAL | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Data & AI | 456 | 34% | 118 | 46% | GDAL |
| Engineering (non-software) | 188 | 14% | 5 | 2% | ArcGIS Pro |
| Construction and civil | 61 | 5% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Research and science | 59 | 4% | 7 | 3% | even |
| Quality, safety & environment | 54 | 4% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Software engineering | 39 | 3% | 55 | 21% | GDAL |
| IT operations & business systems | 29 | 2% | 3 | 1% | even |
| Product, program & project management | 29 | 2% | 3 | 1% | even |
| Agriculture and environment | 28 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Sales | 17 | 1% | 8 | 3% | even |
| Business development & strategy | 9 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| General management & consulting | 8 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using ArcGIS Pro →
Companies using GDAL →
gis software ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
GDAL is named by 108 companies in job postings and ArcGIS Pro by 399; 21 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/arcgis-pro-vs-gdal)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
ArcGIS Pro vs GDAL: questions
Which is more used, ArcGIS Pro or GDAL?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, ArcGIS Pro (399) over GDAL (108). By website-and-DNS footprint, GDAL (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses ArcGIS Pro?
34% of ArcGIS Pro companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 66% for GDAL. 36% of ArcGIS Pro companies have over 1,000 employees, against 21% for GDAL.
Do companies run both?
21 companies name both in their postings, usually ArcGIS Pro in marketing and GDAL in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on ArcGIS Pro or GDAL. Start free, no card.