Aspen Plus VS CAESAR II
As of 30 October 2026, CAESAR II is named by 131 companies and Aspen Plus by 102; Aspen Plus skews to companies under 200 people (39% vs 27%), CAESAR II to companies over 1,000 (39% vs 40%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Aspen Plus's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, CAESAR II rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- Aspen Plus: 2–200 employees
- 39%
- CAESAR II: 2–200 employees
- 27%
- Aspen Plus: 1,000+ employees
- 40%
- CAESAR II: 1,000+ employees
- 39%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 2.1 · 2.7
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | Aspen Plus | share | CAESAR II | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 1 | 1% | 3 | 2% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 10 | 10% | 8 | 6% | Aspen Plus |
| 11-50 employees | 14 | 14% | 12 | 9% | Aspen Plus |
| 51-200 employees | 16 | 16% | 16 | 12% | Aspen Plus |
| 201-500 employees | 12 | 12% | 22 | 17% | CAESAR II |
| 501-1000 employees | 8 | 8% | 19 | 15% | CAESAR II |
| 1001-5000 employees | 13 | 13% | 17 | 13% | even |
| 5001-10000 employees | 10 | 10% | 12 | 9% | even |
| 10,001+ employees | 18 | 18% | 22 | 17% | even |
| Segment | Aspen Plus | share | CAESAR II | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturing & industry | 38 | 37% | 27 | 21% | Aspen Plus |
| Business & finance services | 22 | 22% | 65 | 50% | CAESAR II |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 12 | 12% | 18 | 14% | even |
| Public, community & associations | 7 | 7% | 1 | 1% | Aspen Plus |
| Technology & software | 7 | 7% | 3 | 2% | Aspen Plus |
| Property & construction | 6 | 6% | 10 | 8% | even |
| Consumer services & leisure | 5 | 5% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Commerce & trade | 2 | 2% | 3 | 2% | even |
| Media & content | 2 | 2% | 2 | 2% | even |
| Agriculture & forestry | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Automotive | – | – | 2 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Aspen Plus | share | CAESAR II | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 60 | 59% | 79 | 60% | even |
| United Kingdom | 8 | 8% | 8 | 6% | even |
| Germany | 5 | 5% | 3 | 2% | Aspen Plus |
| India | 5 | 5% | 5 | 4% | even |
| France | 4 | 4% | 9 | 7% | CAESAR II |
| Spain | 3 | 3% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Singapore | 3 | 3% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Australia | 2 | 2% | 3 | 2% | even |
| Canada | 2 | 2% | 8 | 6% | CAESAR II |
| NG | 2 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | 1% | 4 | 3% | CAESAR II |
| Argentina | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Brazil | – | – | 3 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Belgium | – | – | 2 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Austria | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| AZ | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Aspen Plus | share | CAESAR II | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Engineering (non-software) | 223 | 76% | 460 | 93% | CAESAR II |
| Research and science | 19 | 7% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Sales | 9 | 3% | 1 | 0% | Aspen Plus |
| Product, program & project management | 4 | 1% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Education & training | 3 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| General management & consulting | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Customer service & success | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Manufacturing and production | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Quality, safety & environment | 1 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Unclassified | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Skilled trades and field service | – | – | 4 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Construction and civil | – | – | 3 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Data & AI | – | – | 2 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| IT operations & business systems | – | – | 2 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Software engineering | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using Aspen Plus →
Companies using CAESAR II →
cae simulation ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
CAESAR II is named by 131 companies in job postings and Aspen Plus by 102; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/aspen-plus-vs-caesar-ii)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
Aspen Plus vs CAESAR II: questions
Which is more used, Aspen Plus or CAESAR II?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, CAESAR II (131) over Aspen Plus (102). By website-and-DNS footprint, CAESAR II (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses Aspen Plus?
39% of Aspen Plus companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 27% for CAESAR II. 40% of Aspen Plus companies have over 1,000 employees, against 39% for CAESAR II.
Do companies run both?
0 companies name both in their postings, usually Aspen Plus in marketing and CAESAR II in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on Aspen Plus or CAESAR II. Start free, no card.