Auth0 VS JSON Web Token
As of 30 October 2026, JSON Web Token is named by 1,323 companies and Auth0 by 264; Auth0 skews to companies under 200 people (41% vs 43%), JSON Web Token to companies over 1,000 (32% vs 27%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Auth0's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, JSON Web Token rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- Auth0: 2–200 employees
- 41%
- JSON Web Token: 2–200 employees
- 43%
- Auth0: 1,000+ employees
- 27%
- JSON Web Token: 1,000+ employees
- 32%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 2.0 · 2.4
- Website or DNS footprint
- 3,165 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | Auth0 | share | JSON Web Token | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 4 | 2% | 19 | 1% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 21 | 8% | 89 | 7% | even |
| 11-50 employees | 33 | 13% | 214 | 16% | JSON Web Token |
| 51-200 employees | 54 | 20% | 265 | 20% | even |
| 201-500 employees | 51 | 19% | 179 | 14% | Auth0 |
| 501-1000 employees | 31 | 12% | 128 | 10% | Auth0 |
| 1001-5000 employees | 34 | 13% | 192 | 15% | even |
| 5001-10000 employees | 11 | 4% | 67 | 5% | even |
| 10,001+ employees | 25 | 9% | 170 | 13% | JSON Web Token |
| Segment | Auth0 | share | JSON Web Token | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology & software | 144 | 55% | 755 | 57% | JSON Web Token |
| Business & finance services | 59 | 22% | 284 | 21% | even |
| Manufacturing & industry | 13 | 5% | 76 | 6% | even |
| Media & content | 10 | 4% | 38 | 3% | even |
| Health care | 7 | 3% | 26 | 2% | even |
| Public, community & associations | 6 | 2% | 10 | 1% | even |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 6 | 2% | 21 | 2% | even |
| Consumer services & leisure | 5 | 2% | 36 | 3% | even |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 4 | 2% | 19 | 1% | even |
| Automotive | 3 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Commerce & trade | 3 | 1% | 21 | 2% | even |
| Hospitality & travel | 3 | 1% | 12 | 1% | even |
| Property & construction | – | – | 14 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Auth0 | share | JSON Web Token | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 188 | 71% | 787 | 59% | Auth0 |
| United Kingdom | 20 | 8% | 72 | 5% | Auth0 |
| Canada | 9 | 3% | 29 | 2% | even |
| Germany | 8 | 3% | 39 | 3% | even |
| Australia | 7 | 3% | 20 | 2% | even |
| Belgium | 4 | 2% | 13 | 1% | even |
| Poland | 4 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| United Arab Emirates | 2 | 1% | 15 | 1% | even |
| Brazil | 2 | 1% | 30 | 2% | even |
| Cyprus | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| France | 2 | 1% | 43 | 3% | JSON Web Token |
| India | 2 | 1% | 97 | 7% | JSON Web Token |
| Singapore | – | – | 20 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Spain | – | – | 13 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Auth0 | share | JSON Web Token | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Software engineering | 352 | 50% | 3,113 | 73% | JSON Web Token |
| IT operations & business systems | 139 | 20% | 452 | 11% | Auth0 |
| Product, program & project management | 37 | 5% | 30 | 1% | Auth0 |
| Sales | 32 | 5% | 20 | 0% | Auth0 |
| Data & AI | 15 | 2% | 160 | 4% | even |
| Customer service & success | 14 | 2% | 24 | 1% | even |
| Engineering (non-software) | 5 | 1% | 82 | 2% | even |
| Marketing & communications | 5 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Business development & strategy | 2 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Design & UX | 2 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| General management & consulting | 2 | 0% | 3 | 0% | even |
| Skilled trades and field service | 2 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Education & training | – | – | 5 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Unclassified | – | – | 3 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Construction and civil | – | – | 2 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Quality, safety & environment | – | – | 2 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using Auth0 →
Companies using JSON Web Token →
Identity ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
JSON Web Token is named by 1,323 companies in job postings and Auth0 by 264; 71 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/auth0-vs-json-web-token)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
Auth0 vs JSON Web Token: questions
Which is more used, Auth0 or JSON Web Token?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, JSON Web Token (1,323) over Auth0 (264). By website-and-DNS footprint, Auth0 (3,165 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses Auth0?
41% of Auth0 companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 43% for JSON Web Token. 27% of Auth0 companies have over 1,000 employees, against 32% for JSON Web Token.
Do companies run both?
71 companies name both in their postings, usually Auth0 in marketing and JSON Web Token in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on Auth0 or JSON Web Token. Start free, no card.