Autodesk Civil 3D VS GEOPAK
As of 30 October 2026, GEOPAK is named by 113 companies and Autodesk Civil 3D by 1,466; Autodesk Civil 3D skews to companies under 200 people (48% vs 27%), GEOPAK to companies over 1,000 (33% vs 20%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Autodesk Civil 3D's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, GEOPAK rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- Autodesk Civil 3D: 2–200 employees
- 48%
- GEOPAK: 2–200 employees
- 27%
- Autodesk Civil 3D: 1,000+ employees
- 20%
- GEOPAK: 1,000+ employees
- 33%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 7.4 · 3.8
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | Autodesk Civil 3D | share | GEOPAK | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 4 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| 2-10 employees | 86 | 6% | 1 | 1% | Autodesk Civil 3D |
| 11-50 employees | 249 | 17% | 8 | 7% | Autodesk Civil 3D |
| 51-200 employees | 374 | 26% | 21 | 19% | Autodesk Civil 3D |
| 201-500 employees | 299 | 20% | 24 | 21% | even |
| 501-1000 employees | 159 | 11% | 22 | 19% | GEOPAK |
| 1001-5000 employees | 185 | 13% | 26 | 23% | GEOPAK |
| 5001-10000 employees | 47 | 3% | 2 | 2% | even |
| 10,001+ employees | 63 | 4% | 9 | 8% | GEOPAK |
| Segment | Autodesk Civil 3D | share | GEOPAK | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business & finance services | 775 | 53% | 75 | 66% | GEOPAK |
| Property & construction | 405 | 28% | 36 | 32% | GEOPAK |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 74 | 5% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Manufacturing & industry | 61 | 4% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Public, community & associations | 51 | 3% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Technology & software | 33 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Consumer services & leisure | 21 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Media & content | 16 | 1% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 14 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Commerce & trade | 11 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Hospitality & travel | 3 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Automotive | 2 | 0% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Segment | Autodesk Civil 3D | share | GEOPAK | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 962 | 66% | 107 | 95% | GEOPAK |
| Canada | 97 | 7% | 1 | 1% | Autodesk Civil 3D |
| United Kingdom | 73 | 5% | 2 | 2% | Autodesk Civil 3D |
| Germany | 62 | 4% | 1 | 1% | Autodesk Civil 3D |
| Netherlands | 37 | 3% | 2 | 2% | even |
| Australia | 30 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| France | 23 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Spain | 21 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Italy | 17 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Belgium | 12 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| United Arab Emirates | 11 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Switzerland | 11 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Autodesk Civil 3D | share | GEOPAK | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Engineering (non-software) | 10,402 | 68% | 422 | 69% | even |
| Construction and civil | 3,023 | 20% | 116 | 19% | even |
| Product, program & project management | 143 | 1% | 5 | 1% | even |
| Data & AI | 51 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Unclassified | 47 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Real estate and property | 43 | 0% | 2 | 0% | even |
| Quality, safety & environment | 34 | 0% | 3 | 0% | even |
| Design & UX | 30 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| IT operations & business systems | 28 | 0% | 2 | 0% | even |
| Customer service & success | 24 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Skilled trades and field service | 24 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| General management & consulting | 14 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Logistics warehouse and transport | – | – | 3 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Business development & strategy | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using Autodesk Civil 3D →
Companies using GEOPAK →
civil infrastructure water ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
GEOPAK is named by 113 companies in job postings and Autodesk Civil 3D by 1,466; 77 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/autodesk-civil-3d-vs-geopak)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
Autodesk Civil 3D vs GEOPAK: questions
Which is more used, Autodesk Civil 3D or GEOPAK?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, Autodesk Civil 3D (1,466) over GEOPAK (113). By website-and-DNS footprint, GEOPAK (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses Autodesk Civil 3D?
48% of Autodesk Civil 3D companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 27% for GEOPAK. 20% of Autodesk Civil 3D companies have over 1,000 employees, against 33% for GEOPAK.
Do companies run both?
77 companies name both in their postings, usually Autodesk Civil 3D in marketing and GEOPAK in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on Autodesk Civil 3D or GEOPAK. Start free, no card.