Autodesk Fusion 360 VS Onshape
As of 30 October 2026, Onshape is named by 160 companies and Autodesk Fusion 360 by 490; Autodesk Fusion 360 skews to companies under 200 people (64% vs 75%), Onshape to companies over 1,000 (7% vs 19%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Autodesk Fusion 360's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Onshape rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- Autodesk Fusion 360: 2–200 employees
- 64%
- Onshape: 2–200 employees
- 75%
- Autodesk Fusion 360: 1,000+ employees
- 19%
- Onshape: 1,000+ employees
- 7%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 3.7 · 1.9
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | Autodesk Fusion 360 | share | Onshape | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 8 | 2% | 4 | 3% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 75 | 15% | 36 | 23% | Onshape |
| 11-50 employees | 125 | 26% | 44 | 28% | even |
| 51-200 employees | 112 | 23% | 40 | 25% | Onshape |
| 201-500 employees | 49 | 10% | 15 | 9% | even |
| 501-1000 employees | 29 | 6% | 10 | 6% | even |
| 1001-5000 employees | 45 | 9% | 1 | 1% | Autodesk Fusion 360 |
| 5001-10000 employees | 11 | 2% | 6 | 4% | even |
| 10,001+ employees | 36 | 7% | 4 | 3% | Autodesk Fusion 360 |
| Segment | Autodesk Fusion 360 | share | Onshape | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturing & industry | 276 | 56% | 76 | 48% | Autodesk Fusion 360 |
| Technology & software | 50 | 10% | 30 | 19% | Onshape |
| Business & finance services | 40 | 8% | 13 | 8% | even |
| Consumer services & leisure | 25 | 5% | 11 | 7% | even |
| Public, community & associations | 22 | 4% | 8 | 5% | even |
| Automotive | 17 | 3% | 5 | 3% | even |
| Commerce & trade | 17 | 3% | 3 | 2% | even |
| Property & construction | 12 | 2% | 5 | 3% | even |
| Media & content | 10 | 2% | 3 | 2% | even |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 10 | 2% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 7 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Health care | 3 | 1% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Agriculture & forestry | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Autodesk Fusion 360 | share | Onshape | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 304 | 62% | 125 | 78% | Onshape |
| Germany | 37 | 8% | 8 | 5% | Autodesk Fusion 360 |
| United Kingdom | 26 | 5% | 5 | 3% | Autodesk Fusion 360 |
| Canada | 19 | 4% | 4 | 3% | even |
| India | 12 | 2% | 1 | 1% | even |
| France | 10 | 2% | 3 | 2% | even |
| Netherlands | 7 | 1% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Switzerland | 6 | 1% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Spain | 6 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Sweden | 6 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Singapore | 6 | 1% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Australia | 5 | 1% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Hungary | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Ireland | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Autodesk Fusion 360 | share | Onshape | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Design & UX | 952 | 44% | 5 | 1% | Autodesk Fusion 360 |
| Engineering (non-software) | 527 | 25% | 312 | 76% | Onshape |
| Manufacturing and production | 285 | 13% | 2 | 0% | Autodesk Fusion 360 |
| Skilled trades and field service | 22 | 1% | 2 | 0% | even |
| Education & training | 17 | 1% | 6 | 1% | even |
| Software engineering | 17 | 1% | 13 | 3% | Onshape |
| Product, program & project management | 11 | 1% | 2 | 0% | even |
| Sales | 10 | 0% | 10 | 2% | even |
| IT operations & business systems | 9 | 0% | 2 | 0% | even |
| Research and science | 7 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Customer service & success | 6 | 0% | 2 | 0% | even |
| Arts media and entertainment | 4 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Quality, safety & environment | – | – | 8 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Construction and civil | – | – | 2 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using Autodesk Fusion 360 →
Companies using Onshape →
mechanical cad ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
Onshape is named by 160 companies in job postings and Autodesk Fusion 360 by 490; 66 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/autodesk-fusion-360-vs-onshape)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
Autodesk Fusion 360 vs Onshape: questions
Which is more used, Autodesk Fusion 360 or Onshape?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, Autodesk Fusion 360 (490) over Onshape (160). By website-and-DNS footprint, Onshape (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses Autodesk Fusion 360?
64% of Autodesk Fusion 360 companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 75% for Onshape. 19% of Autodesk Fusion 360 companies have over 1,000 employees, against 7% for Onshape.
Do companies run both?
66 companies name both in their postings, usually Autodesk Fusion 360 in marketing and Onshape in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on Autodesk Fusion 360 or Onshape. Start free, no card.