Autodesk Vault VS ENOVIA
As of 30 October 2026, ENOVIA is named by 143 companies and Autodesk Vault by 122; Autodesk Vault skews to companies under 200 people (26% vs 27%), ENOVIA to companies over 1,000 (46% vs 48%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Autodesk Vault's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, ENOVIA rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- Autodesk Vault: 2–200 employees
- 26%
- ENOVIA: 2–200 employees
- 27%
- Autodesk Vault: 1,000+ employees
- 48%
- ENOVIA: 1,000+ employees
- 46%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 1.9 · 6.2
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | Autodesk Vault | share | ENOVIA | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11-50 employees | 9 | 7% | 10 | 7% | even |
| 51-200 employees | 23 | 19% | 21 | 15% | Autodesk Vault |
| 201-500 employees | 21 | 17% | 24 | 17% | even |
| 501-1000 employees | 11 | 9% | 14 | 10% | even |
| 1001-5000 employees | 24 | 20% | 21 | 15% | Autodesk Vault |
| 5001-10000 employees | 11 | 9% | 12 | 8% | even |
| 10,001+ employees | 23 | 19% | 33 | 23% | ENOVIA |
| 2-10 employees | – | – | 7 | 5% | outside top 12 |
| Self-employed | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Autodesk Vault | share | ENOVIA | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturing & industry | 75 | 61% | 68 | 48% | Autodesk Vault |
| Technology & software | 11 | 9% | 23 | 16% | ENOVIA |
| Property & construction | 9 | 7% | 1 | 1% | Autodesk Vault |
| Business & finance services | 7 | 6% | 22 | 15% | ENOVIA |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 7 | 6% | 5 | 3% | Autodesk Vault |
| Automotive | 6 | 5% | 8 | 6% | even |
| Commerce & trade | 5 | 4% | 3 | 2% | Autodesk Vault |
| Consumer services & leisure | 1 | 1% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 1 | 1% | 4 | 3% | even |
| Public, community & associations | – | – | 3 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Health care | – | – | 3 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Media & content | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Autodesk Vault | share | ENOVIA | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 67 | 55% | 85 | 59% | ENOVIA |
| Germany | 17 | 14% | 10 | 7% | Autodesk Vault |
| United Kingdom | 8 | 7% | 8 | 6% | even |
| Canada | 6 | 5% | 7 | 5% | even |
| Italy | 6 | 5% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Netherlands | 5 | 4% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Austria | 2 | 2% | 1 | 1% | even |
| India | 2 | 2% | 3 | 2% | even |
| Australia | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Belgium | 1 | 1% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% | 1 | 1% | even |
| France | – | – | 10 | 7% | outside top 12 |
| Sweden | – | – | 4 | 3% | outside top 12 |
| Poland | – | – | 3 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Spain | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Autodesk Vault | share | ENOVIA | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Engineering (non-software) | 188 | 67% | 453 | 43% | Autodesk Vault |
| IT operations & business systems | 14 | 5% | 53 | 5% | even |
| Product, program & project management | 12 | 4% | 59 | 6% | even |
| Software engineering | 8 | 3% | 38 | 4% | even |
| Design & UX | 4 | 1% | 7 | 1% | even |
| Skilled trades and field service | 4 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Construction and civil | 3 | 1% | 8 | 1% | even |
| Data & AI | 2 | 1% | 14 | 1% | even |
| Quality, safety & environment | 2 | 1% | 18 | 2% | even |
| Education & training | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Manufacturing and production | 1 | 0% | 23 | 2% | even |
| Sales | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Administration & office | – | – | 20 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Logistics warehouse and transport | – | – | 13 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| General management & consulting | – | – | 8 | 1% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using Autodesk Vault →
Companies using ENOVIA →
plm pdm ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
ENOVIA is named by 143 companies in job postings and Autodesk Vault by 122; 3 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/autodesk-vault-vs-enovia)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
Autodesk Vault vs ENOVIA: questions
Which is more used, Autodesk Vault or ENOVIA?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, ENOVIA (143) over Autodesk Vault (122). By website-and-DNS footprint, ENOVIA (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses Autodesk Vault?
26% of Autodesk Vault companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 27% for ENOVIA. 48% of Autodesk Vault companies have over 1,000 employees, against 46% for ENOVIA.
Do companies run both?
3 companies name both in their postings, usually Autodesk Vault in marketing and ENOVIA in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on Autodesk Vault or ENOVIA. Start free, no card.