Breaknorm
Sign inStart free

Product

SignalsPeopleCompaniesLocal businessesMCP and API

Plays

Post engagersTeam build-outChampion movedHiring surgeNewly fundedLookalikesAll plays

Data

Coverage by countryHiring dataJob changesEmail verificationCompanies by toolWho is hiringMarket mapsOutboundCompany profilesCompare
PricingDatasetsDocsSign in
Compare · ci cd

AWS CodePipeline VS GitHub Actions

As of 30 October 2026, GitHub Actions is named by 4,647 companies and AWS CodePipeline by 264; AWS CodePipeline skews to companies under 200 people (42% vs 48%), GitHub Actions to companies over 1,000 (25% vs 31%).

As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.

The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: AWS CodePipeline's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, GitHub Actions rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.

AWS CodePipeline: 2–200 employees
42%
GitHub Actions: 2–200 employees
48%
AWS CodePipeline: 1,000+ employees
31%
GitHub Actions: 1,000+ employees
25%
Postings per company, 90 days
2.2 · 2.9
Website or DNS footprint
0 · 0
264companies name AWS CodePipeline
4,647companies name GitHub Actions
226name both
571 · 13,645postings in 90 days, AWS CodePipeline · GitHub Actions
02Side by side

Who chooses which

Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.

By company size
SegmentAWS CodePipelineshareGitHub ActionsshareLeans
Self-employed21%641%even
2-10 employees145%3908%GitHub Actions
11-50 employees4216%81518%even
51-200 employees5621%1,04522%even
201-500 employees3313%68515%GitHub Actions
501-1000 employees3413%47010%AWS CodePipeline
1001-5000 employees3915%60313%even
5001-10000 employees114%1704%even
10,001+ employees3313%4059%AWS CodePipeline
By industry
SegmentAWS CodePipelineshareGitHub ActionsshareLeans
Technology & software14555%2,57755%even
Business & finance services6123%87619%AWS CodePipeline
Manufacturing & industry208%3888%even
Media & content104%1674%even
Utilities & infrastructure93%942%even
Consumer services & leisure52%1002%even
Public, community & associations42%772%even
Property & construction31%521%even
Automotive21%391%even
Transport, logistics & rental21%611%even
Commerce & trade10%1112%GitHub Actions
Health care10%611%even
By country
SegmentAWS CodePipelineshareGitHub ActionsshareLeans
United States16864%2,80560%AWS CodePipeline
United Kingdom218%4069%even
India145%1393%AWS CodePipeline
Germany104%2395%even
Canada62%1102%even
Japan52%––outside top 12
Singapore52%––outside top 12
Australia42%561%even
Italy42%––outside top 12
United Arab Emirates31%––outside top 12
Brazil21%471%even
EG21%––outside top 12
France––1173%outside top 12
Netherlands––661%outside top 12
Sweden––631%outside top 12
Poland––491%outside top 12
Switzerland––441%outside top 12
Postings by team (share of each tool's postings)
SegmentAWS CodePipelineshareGitHub ActionsshareLeans
Software engineering43956%11,32265%GitHub Actions
IT operations & business systems15820%1,83510%AWS CodePipeline
Data & AI9012%2,09412%even
Product, program & project management101%1221%even
Customer service & success81%340%even
Quality, safety & environment41%1121%even
Sales41%670%even
Hospitality and food service20%––outside top 12
Marketing & communications20%––outside top 12
Construction and civil10%––outside top 12
Engineering (non-software)10%3102%even
General management & consulting10%250%even
Unclassified––260%outside top 12
Design & UX––110%outside top 12
Legal, compliance & risk––110%outside top 12
Cite this

Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.

GitHub Actions is named by 4,647 companies in job postings and AWS CodePipeline by 264; 226 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/aws-codepipeline-vs-github-actions)
How we know

Read from the source, not self-reported

Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →

  • Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
  • Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
  • SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
  • Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
FAQ

AWS CodePipeline vs GitHub Actions: questions

Which is more used, AWS CodePipeline or GitHub Actions?

By companies naming it in their own job postings, GitHub Actions (4,647) over AWS CodePipeline (264). By website-and-DNS footprint, GitHub Actions (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.

Who chooses AWS CodePipeline?

42% of AWS CodePipeline companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 48% for GitHub Actions. 31% of AWS CodePipeline companies have over 1,000 employees, against 25% for GitHub Actions.

Do companies run both?

226 companies name both in their postings, usually AWS CodePipeline in marketing and GitHub Actions in sales, or during a migration.

Where do these numbers come from?

From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.

Companies and people

Get either list your way

The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.

Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it

Filter on AWS CodePipeline or GitHub Actions. Start free, no card.

  1. 01Sign up, no card
  2. 02Connect Claude, ChatGPT or an API key
  3. 03Ask for your market