Breaknorm
Sign inStart free

Product

SignalsPeopleCompaniesLocal businessesMCP and API

Plays

Post engagersTeam build-outChampion movedHiring surgeNewly fundedLookalikesAll plays

Data

Coverage by countryHiring dataJob changesEmail verificationCompanies by toolWho is hiringMarket mapsOutboundCompany profilesCompare
PricingDatasetsDocsSign in
Compare · ci cd

AWS CodePipeline VS Travis CI

As of 30 October 2026, Travis CI is named by 101 companies and AWS CodePipeline by 264; AWS CodePipeline skews to companies under 200 people (42% vs 52%), Travis CI to companies over 1,000 (27% vs 31%).

As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.

The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: AWS CodePipeline's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Travis CI rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.

AWS CodePipeline: 2–200 employees
42%
Travis CI: 2–200 employees
52%
AWS CodePipeline: 1,000+ employees
31%
Travis CI: 1,000+ employees
27%
Postings per company, 90 days
2.2 · 1.7
Website or DNS footprint
0 · 0
264companies name AWS CodePipeline
101companies name Travis CI
0name both
571 · 175postings in 90 days, AWS CodePipeline · Travis CI
02Side by side

Who chooses which

Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.

By company size
SegmentAWS CodePipelineshareTravis CIshareLeans
Self-employed21%11%even
2-10 employees145%77%even
11-50 employees4216%2020%Travis CI
51-200 employees5621%2626%Travis CI
201-500 employees3313%1313%even
501-1000 employees3413%77%AWS CodePipeline
1001-5000 employees3915%1717%Travis CI
5001-10000 employees114%22%AWS CodePipeline
10,001+ employees3313%88%AWS CodePipeline
By industry
SegmentAWS CodePipelineshareTravis CIshareLeans
Technology & software14555%6766%Travis CI
Business & finance services6123%1212%AWS CodePipeline
Manufacturing & industry208%33%AWS CodePipeline
Media & content104%55%even
Utilities & infrastructure93%33%even
Consumer services & leisure52%22%even
Public, community & associations42%55%Travis CI
Property & construction31%11%even
Automotive21%––outside top 12
Transport, logistics & rental21%––outside top 12
Commerce & trade10%33%Travis CI
Health care10%––outside top 12
By country
SegmentAWS CodePipelineshareTravis CIshareLeans
United States16864%5857%AWS CodePipeline
United Kingdom218%77%even
India145%33%AWS CodePipeline
Germany104%33%even
Canada62%22%even
Japan52%––outside top 12
Singapore52%––outside top 12
Australia42%––outside top 12
Italy42%––outside top 12
United Arab Emirates31%22%even
Brazil21%––outside top 12
EG21%––outside top 12
France––33%outside top 12
Netherlands––33%outside top 12
Poland––33%outside top 12
Portugal––22%outside top 12
AF––11%outside top 12
Argentina––11%outside top 12
Postings by team (share of each tool's postings)
SegmentAWS CodePipelineshareTravis CIshareLeans
Software engineering43956%23980%Travis CI
IT operations & business systems15820%3311%AWS CodePipeline
Data & AI9012%72%AWS CodePipeline
Product, program & project management101%––outside top 12
Customer service & success81%––outside top 12
Quality, safety & environment41%––outside top 12
Sales41%31%even
Hospitality and food service20%––outside top 12
Marketing & communications20%––outside top 12
Construction and civil10%––outside top 12
Engineering (non-software)10%21%even
General management & consulting10%––outside top 12
Education & training––10%outside top 12
Social care and community––10%outside top 12
Cite this

Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.

Travis CI is named by 101 companies in job postings and AWS CodePipeline by 264; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/aws-codepipeline-vs-travis-ci)
How we know

Read from the source, not self-reported

Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →

  • Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
  • Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
  • SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
  • Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
FAQ

AWS CodePipeline vs Travis CI: questions

Which is more used, AWS CodePipeline or Travis CI?

By companies naming it in their own job postings, AWS CodePipeline (264) over Travis CI (101). By website-and-DNS footprint, Travis CI (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.

Who chooses AWS CodePipeline?

42% of AWS CodePipeline companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 52% for Travis CI. 31% of AWS CodePipeline companies have over 1,000 employees, against 27% for Travis CI.

Do companies run both?

0 companies name both in their postings, usually AWS CodePipeline in marketing and Travis CI in sales, or during a migration.

Where do these numbers come from?

From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.

Companies and people

Get either list your way

The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.

Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it

Filter on AWS CodePipeline or Travis CI. Start free, no card.

  1. 01Sign up, no card
  2. 02Connect Claude, ChatGPT or an API key
  3. 03Ask for your market