AWS Step Functions VS Control-M
As of 4 November 2026, Control-M is named by 312 companies and AWS Step Functions by 738; AWS Step Functions skews to companies under 200 people (39% vs 27%), Control-M to companies over 1,000 (52% vs 38%).
As of 4 November 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: AWS Step Functions's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Control-M rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- AWS Step Functions: 2–200 employees
- 39%
- Control-M: 2–200 employees
- 27%
- AWS Step Functions: 1,000+ employees
- 38%
- Control-M: 1,000+ employees
- 52%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 2.8 · 3.3
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | AWS Step Functions | share | Control-M | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 16 | 2% | 7 | 2% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 43 | 6% | 18 | 6% | even |
| 11-50 employees | 90 | 12% | 30 | 10% | AWS Step Functions |
| 51-200 employees | 152 | 21% | 35 | 11% | AWS Step Functions |
| 201-500 employees | 87 | 12% | 35 | 11% | even |
| 501-1000 employees | 73 | 10% | 24 | 8% | AWS Step Functions |
| 1001-5000 employees | 126 | 17% | 67 | 21% | Control-M |
| 5001-10000 employees | 37 | 5% | 26 | 8% | Control-M |
| 10,001+ employees | 114 | 15% | 70 | 22% | Control-M |
| Segment | AWS Step Functions | share | Control-M | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology & software | 355 | 48% | 139 | 45% | AWS Step Functions |
| Business & finance services | 202 | 27% | 118 | 38% | Control-M |
| Manufacturing & industry | 47 | 6% | 12 | 4% | AWS Step Functions |
| Media & content | 30 | 4% | 3 | 1% | AWS Step Functions |
| Consumer services & leisure | 24 | 3% | 7 | 2% | even |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 15 | 2% | 7 | 2% | even |
| Public, community & associations | 12 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Commerce & trade | 11 | 1% | 12 | 4% | Control-M |
| Health care | 10 | 1% | 4 | 1% | even |
| Automotive | 9 | 1% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Property & construction | 9 | 1% | 3 | 1% | even |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 8 | 1% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Hospitality & travel | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | AWS Step Functions | share | Control-M | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 497 | 67% | 141 | 45% | AWS Step Functions |
| United Kingdom | 46 | 6% | 20 | 6% | even |
| India | 23 | 3% | 9 | 3% | even |
| Canada | 21 | 3% | 10 | 3% | even |
| Australia | 16 | 2% | 10 | 3% | even |
| Germany | 16 | 2% | 14 | 4% | Control-M |
| Brazil | 15 | 2% | 7 | 2% | even |
| France | 11 | 1% | 36 | 12% | Control-M |
| Spain | 10 | 1% | 11 | 4% | Control-M |
| United Arab Emirates | 4 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Ireland | 4 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Japan | 4 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Portugal | – | – | 7 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Switzerland | – | – | 6 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Mexico | – | – | 4 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | AWS Step Functions | share | Control-M | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Software engineering | 1,005 | 40% | 344 | 22% | AWS Step Functions |
| Data & AI | 922 | 37% | 256 | 16% | AWS Step Functions |
| IT operations & business systems | 174 | 7% | 357 | 22% | Control-M |
| Product, program & project management | 40 | 2% | 11 | 1% | even |
| Sales | 16 | 1% | 3 | 0% | even |
| Customer service & success | 12 | 0% | 20 | 1% | even |
| Engineering (non-software) | 10 | 0% | 58 | 4% | Control-M |
| Marketing & communications | 5 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Research and science | 5 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| General management & consulting | 4 | 0% | 3 | 0% | even |
| Education & training | 2 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Finance & accounting | 2 | 0% | 5 | 0% | even |
| Human resources | 2 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Arts media and entertainment | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Procurement and purchasing | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Quality, safety & environment | 1 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Unclassified | 1 | 0% | 3 | 0% | even |
| Manufacturing and production | – | – | 17 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Administration & office | – | – | 2 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Legal, compliance & risk | – | – | 2 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Logistics warehouse and transport | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Skilled trades and field service | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using AWS Step Functions →
Companies using Control-M →
workflow engines scheduling ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
Control-M is named by 312 companies in job postings and AWS Step Functions by 738; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 4 November 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/aws-step-functions-vs-control-m)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
AWS Step Functions vs Control-M: questions
Which is more used, AWS Step Functions or Control-M?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, AWS Step Functions (738) over Control-M (312). By website-and-DNS footprint, Control-M (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses AWS Step Functions?
39% of AWS Step Functions companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 27% for Control-M. 38% of AWS Step Functions companies have over 1,000 employees, against 52% for Control-M.
Do companies run both?
0 companies name both in their postings, usually AWS Step Functions in marketing and Control-M in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on AWS Step Functions or Control-M. Start free, no card.