Azure CLI VS OpenTofu
As of 30 October 2026, OpenTofu is named by 314 companies and Azure CLI by 212; Azure CLI skews to companies under 200 people (37% vs 49%), OpenTofu to companies over 1,000 (24% vs 34%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Azure CLI's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, OpenTofu rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- Azure CLI: 2–200 employees
- 37%
- OpenTofu: 2–200 employees
- 49%
- Azure CLI: 1,000+ employees
- 34%
- OpenTofu: 1,000+ employees
- 24%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 2.2 · 1.9
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | Azure CLI | share | OpenTofu | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 2 | 1% | 6 | 2% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 12 | 6% | 20 | 6% | even |
| 11-50 employees | 32 | 15% | 53 | 17% | even |
| 51-200 employees | 34 | 16% | 81 | 26% | OpenTofu |
| 201-500 employees | 37 | 17% | 42 | 13% | Azure CLI |
| 501-1000 employees | 22 | 10% | 38 | 12% | even |
| 1001-5000 employees | 33 | 16% | 37 | 12% | Azure CLI |
| 5001-10000 employees | 14 | 7% | 15 | 5% | even |
| 10,001+ employees | 26 | 12% | 22 | 7% | Azure CLI |
| Segment | Azure CLI | share | OpenTofu | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology & software | 104 | 49% | 174 | 55% | OpenTofu |
| Business & finance services | 44 | 21% | 57 | 18% | Azure CLI |
| Manufacturing & industry | 24 | 11% | 24 | 8% | Azure CLI |
| Consumer services & leisure | 10 | 5% | 6 | 2% | Azure CLI |
| Commerce & trade | 5 | 2% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Health care | 5 | 2% | 6 | 2% | even |
| Media & content | 5 | 2% | 11 | 4% | even |
| Property & construction | 5 | 2% | 3 | 1% | even |
| Public, community & associations | 3 | 1% | 11 | 4% | OpenTofu |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 3 | 1% | 5 | 2% | even |
| Automotive | 2 | 1% | 4 | 1% | even |
| Hospitality & travel | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Transport, logistics & rental | – | – | 8 | 3% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Azure CLI | share | OpenTofu | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 111 | 52% | 171 | 54% | OpenTofu |
| United Kingdom | 16 | 8% | 30 | 10% | OpenTofu |
| Canada | 12 | 6% | 10 | 3% | Azure CLI |
| Germany | 9 | 4% | 40 | 13% | OpenTofu |
| India | 9 | 4% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Australia | 6 | 3% | 5 | 2% | even |
| Netherlands | 6 | 3% | 10 | 3% | even |
| France | 4 | 2% | 8 | 3% | even |
| Sweden | 4 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Spain | 3 | 1% | 3 | 1% | even |
| Slovakia | 3 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Belgium | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Poland | – | – | 7 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Singapore | – | – | 4 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Switzerland | – | – | 3 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Austria | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Azure CLI | share | OpenTofu | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IT operations & business systems | 329 | 56% | 165 | 23% | Azure CLI |
| Software engineering | 133 | 23% | 431 | 60% | OpenTofu |
| Data & AI | 25 | 4% | 52 | 7% | OpenTofu |
| Engineering (non-software) | 22 | 4% | 6 | 1% | Azure CLI |
| Product, program & project management | 3 | 1% | 11 | 2% | even |
| Administration & office | 2 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Business development & strategy | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Customer service & success | 1 | 0% | 2 | 0% | even |
| Education & training | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Facilities cleaning and security | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| General management & consulting | 1 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Legal, compliance & risk | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Sales | – | – | 3 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Marketing & communications | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using Azure CLI →
Companies using OpenTofu →
iac config management ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
OpenTofu is named by 314 companies in job postings and Azure CLI by 212; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/azure-cli-vs-opentofu)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
Azure CLI vs OpenTofu: questions
Which is more used, Azure CLI or OpenTofu?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, OpenTofu (314) over Azure CLI (212). By website-and-DNS footprint, OpenTofu (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses Azure CLI?
37% of Azure CLI companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 49% for OpenTofu. 34% of Azure CLI companies have over 1,000 employees, against 24% for OpenTofu.
Do companies run both?
0 companies name both in their postings, usually Azure CLI in marketing and OpenTofu in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on Azure CLI or OpenTofu. Start free, no card.