Azure Event Grid VS IBM MQ
As of 30 October 2026, IBM MQ is named by 471 companies and Azure Event Grid by 192; Azure Event Grid skews to companies under 200 people (25% vs 32%), IBM MQ to companies over 1,000 (45% vs 48%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Azure Event Grid's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, IBM MQ rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- Azure Event Grid: 2–200 employees
- 25%
- IBM MQ: 2–200 employees
- 32%
- Azure Event Grid: 1,000+ employees
- 48%
- IBM MQ: 1,000+ employees
- 45%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 2.8 · 4.5
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | Azure Event Grid | share | IBM MQ | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 1 | 1% | 6 | 1% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 5 | 3% | 21 | 4% | even |
| 11-50 employees | 22 | 11% | 51 | 11% | even |
| 51-200 employees | 21 | 11% | 79 | 17% | IBM MQ |
| 201-500 employees | 28 | 15% | 64 | 14% | even |
| 501-1000 employees | 23 | 12% | 38 | 8% | Azure Event Grid |
| 1001-5000 employees | 45 | 23% | 88 | 19% | Azure Event Grid |
| 5001-10000 employees | 11 | 6% | 32 | 7% | even |
| 10,001+ employees | 36 | 19% | 92 | 20% | even |
| Segment | Azure Event Grid | share | IBM MQ | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology & software | 75 | 39% | 234 | 50% | IBM MQ |
| Business & finance services | 45 | 23% | 163 | 35% | IBM MQ |
| Manufacturing & industry | 24 | 13% | 18 | 4% | Azure Event Grid |
| Commerce & trade | 8 | 4% | 9 | 2% | Azure Event Grid |
| Consumer services & leisure | 7 | 4% | 8 | 2% | even |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 7 | 4% | 8 | 2% | even |
| Property & construction | 6 | 3% | 2 | 0% | Azure Event Grid |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 6 | 3% | 5 | 1% | Azure Event Grid |
| Automotive | 3 | 2% | 5 | 1% | even |
| Public, community & associations | 3 | 2% | 4 | 1% | even |
| Media & content | 3 | 2% | 9 | 2% | even |
| Health care | 2 | 1% | 5 | 1% | even |
| Segment | Azure Event Grid | share | IBM MQ | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 99 | 52% | 271 | 58% | IBM MQ |
| United Kingdom | 17 | 9% | 33 | 7% | even |
| Germany | 13 | 7% | 19 | 4% | Azure Event Grid |
| Canada | 10 | 5% | 14 | 3% | Azure Event Grid |
| India | 8 | 4% | 10 | 2% | Azure Event Grid |
| Netherlands | 8 | 4% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Australia | 5 | 3% | 11 | 2% | even |
| Norway | 5 | 3% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Sweden | 4 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Belgium | 3 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Finland | 3 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| France | 3 | 2% | 21 | 4% | IBM MQ |
| Singapore | – | – | 14 | 3% | outside top 12 |
| Poland | – | – | 8 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Switzerland | – | – | 7 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Brazil | – | – | 6 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Spain | – | – | 6 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Azure Event Grid | share | IBM MQ | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Software engineering | 401 | 61% | 2,020 | 59% | Azure Event Grid |
| IT operations & business systems | 98 | 15% | 567 | 16% | even |
| Data & AI | 49 | 8% | 64 | 2% | Azure Event Grid |
| Product, program & project management | 12 | 2% | 59 | 2% | even |
| Sales | 6 | 1% | 10 | 0% | even |
| Engineering (non-software) | 5 | 1% | 41 | 1% | even |
| Design & UX | 2 | 0% | 4 | 0% | even |
| General management & consulting | 2 | 0% | 9 | 0% | even |
| Customer service & success | 1 | 0% | 11 | 0% | even |
| Marketing & communications | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Finance & accounting | – | – | 7 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Quality, safety & environment | – | – | 7 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Administration & office | – | – | 5 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using Azure Event Grid →
Companies using IBM MQ →
message brokers streaming ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
IBM MQ is named by 471 companies in job postings and Azure Event Grid by 192; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/azure-event-grid-vs-ibm-mq)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
Azure Event Grid vs IBM MQ: questions
Which is more used, Azure Event Grid or IBM MQ?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, IBM MQ (471) over Azure Event Grid (192). By website-and-DNS footprint, IBM MQ (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses Azure Event Grid?
25% of Azure Event Grid companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 32% for IBM MQ. 48% of Azure Event Grid companies have over 1,000 employees, against 45% for IBM MQ.
Do companies run both?
0 companies name both in their postings, usually Azure Event Grid in marketing and IBM MQ in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on Azure Event Grid or IBM MQ. Start free, no card.