Azure Monitor VS PRTG Network Monitor
As of 30 October 2026, PRTG Network Monitor is named by 244 companies and Azure Monitor by 741; Azure Monitor skews to companies under 200 people (28% vs 36%), PRTG Network Monitor to companies over 1,000 (33% vs 45%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Azure Monitor's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, PRTG Network Monitor rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- Azure Monitor: 2–200 employees
- 28%
- PRTG Network Monitor: 2–200 employees
- 36%
- Azure Monitor: 1,000+ employees
- 45%
- PRTG Network Monitor: 1,000+ employees
- 33%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 3.0 · 2.0
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | Azure Monitor | share | PRTG Network Monitor | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 5 | 1% | 1 | 0% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 30 | 4% | 13 | 5% | even |
| 11-50 employees | 62 | 8% | 26 | 11% | PRTG Network Monitor |
| 51-200 employees | 118 | 16% | 49 | 20% | PRTG Network Monitor |
| 201-500 employees | 110 | 15% | 46 | 19% | PRTG Network Monitor |
| 501-1000 employees | 79 | 11% | 28 | 11% | even |
| 1001-5000 employees | 149 | 20% | 50 | 20% | even |
| 5001-10000 employees | 62 | 8% | 12 | 5% | Azure Monitor |
| 10,001+ employees | 126 | 17% | 19 | 8% | Azure Monitor |
| Segment | Azure Monitor | share | PRTG Network Monitor | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology & software | 316 | 43% | 93 | 38% | Azure Monitor |
| Business & finance services | 173 | 23% | 40 | 16% | Azure Monitor |
| Manufacturing & industry | 81 | 11% | 43 | 18% | PRTG Network Monitor |
| Commerce & trade | 31 | 4% | 5 | 2% | Azure Monitor |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 23 | 3% | 16 | 7% | PRTG Network Monitor |
| Consumer services & leisure | 22 | 3% | 4 | 2% | even |
| Health care | 21 | 3% | 15 | 6% | PRTG Network Monitor |
| Public, community & associations | 17 | 2% | 5 | 2% | even |
| Property & construction | 16 | 2% | 6 | 2% | even |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 15 | 2% | 5 | 2% | even |
| Media & content | 12 | 2% | 5 | 2% | even |
| Hospitality & travel | 9 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Automotive | – | – | 5 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Azure Monitor | share | PRTG Network Monitor | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 419 | 57% | 117 | 48% | Azure Monitor |
| United Kingdom | 79 | 11% | 19 | 8% | Azure Monitor |
| Germany | 37 | 5% | 34 | 14% | PRTG Network Monitor |
| Canada | 36 | 5% | 11 | 5% | even |
| India | 25 | 3% | 6 | 2% | even |
| Netherlands | 17 | 2% | 6 | 2% | even |
| Australia | 12 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| France | 12 | 2% | 7 | 3% | even |
| Switzerland | 9 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Poland | 8 | 1% | 4 | 2% | even |
| Singapore | 8 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Brazil | 7 | 1% | 5 | 2% | even |
| Austria | – | – | 5 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Italy | – | – | 5 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Portugal | – | – | 4 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Azure Monitor | share | PRTG Network Monitor | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IT operations & business systems | 983 | 37% | 504 | 75% | PRTG Network Monitor |
| Software engineering | 922 | 35% | 13 | 2% | Azure Monitor |
| Data & AI | 263 | 10% | 2 | 0% | Azure Monitor |
| Engineering (non-software) | 41 | 2% | 14 | 2% | even |
| Product, program & project management | 23 | 1% | 6 | 1% | even |
| Customer service & success | 19 | 1% | 18 | 3% | even |
| Sales | 13 | 0% | 4 | 1% | even |
| Quality, safety & environment | 7 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Administration & office | 5 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| General management & consulting | 5 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Construction and civil | 3 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Marketing & communications | 2 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Skilled trades and field service | – | – | 5 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Arts media and entertainment | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Facilities cleaning and security | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using Azure Monitor →
Companies using PRTG Network Monitor →
metrics monitoring ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
PRTG Network Monitor is named by 244 companies in job postings and Azure Monitor by 741; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/azure-monitor-vs-prtg-network-monitor)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
Azure Monitor vs PRTG Network Monitor: questions
Which is more used, Azure Monitor or PRTG Network Monitor?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, Azure Monitor (741) over PRTG Network Monitor (244). By website-and-DNS footprint, PRTG Network Monitor (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses Azure Monitor?
28% of Azure Monitor companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 36% for PRTG Network Monitor. 45% of Azure Monitor companies have over 1,000 employees, against 33% for PRTG Network Monitor.
Do companies run both?
0 companies name both in their postings, usually Azure Monitor in marketing and PRTG Network Monitor in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on Azure Monitor or PRTG Network Monitor. Start free, no card.