Azure Service Bus VS Celery
As of 30 October 2026, Celery is named by 353 companies and Azure Service Bus by 803; Azure Service Bus skews to companies under 200 people (32% vs 63%), Celery to companies over 1,000 (19% vs 42%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Azure Service Bus's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Celery rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- Azure Service Bus: 2–200 employees
- 32%
- Celery: 2–200 employees
- 63%
- Azure Service Bus: 1,000+ employees
- 42%
- Celery: 1,000+ employees
- 19%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 3.1 · 2.0
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | Azure Service Bus | share | Celery | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 3 | 0% | 9 | 3% | Celery |
| 2-10 employees | 22 | 3% | 42 | 12% | Celery |
| 11-50 employees | 102 | 13% | 85 | 24% | Celery |
| 51-200 employees | 131 | 16% | 94 | 27% | Celery |
| 201-500 employees | 121 | 15% | 34 | 10% | Azure Service Bus |
| 501-1000 employees | 83 | 10% | 22 | 6% | Azure Service Bus |
| 1001-5000 employees | 162 | 20% | 35 | 10% | Azure Service Bus |
| 5001-10000 employees | 51 | 6% | 14 | 4% | Azure Service Bus |
| 10,001+ employees | 128 | 16% | 18 | 5% | Azure Service Bus |
| Segment | Azure Service Bus | share | Celery | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology & software | 373 | 46% | 231 | 65% | Celery |
| Business & finance services | 199 | 25% | 55 | 16% | Azure Service Bus |
| Manufacturing & industry | 54 | 7% | 15 | 4% | Azure Service Bus |
| Commerce & trade | 32 | 4% | 6 | 2% | Azure Service Bus |
| Consumer services & leisure | 22 | 3% | 6 | 2% | even |
| Health care | 22 | 3% | 2 | 1% | Azure Service Bus |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 20 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Public, community & associations | 17 | 2% | 5 | 1% | even |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 17 | 2% | 8 | 2% | even |
| Property & construction | 16 | 2% | 4 | 1% | even |
| Media & content | 13 | 2% | 16 | 5% | Celery |
| Automotive | 9 | 1% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Hospitality & travel | – | – | 3 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Azure Service Bus | share | Celery | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 419 | 52% | 224 | 63% | Celery |
| United Kingdom | 88 | 11% | 18 | 5% | Azure Service Bus |
| Germany | 32 | 4% | 15 | 4% | even |
| India | 31 | 4% | 18 | 5% | even |
| Canada | 27 | 3% | 6 | 2% | even |
| Belgium | 21 | 3% | 3 | 1% | even |
| Netherlands | 19 | 2% | 5 | 1% | even |
| Australia | 18 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| France | 18 | 2% | 13 | 4% | even |
| Poland | 15 | 2% | 5 | 1% | even |
| Sweden | 14 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Brazil | 10 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Singapore | – | – | 5 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Switzerland | – | – | 4 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Czechia | – | – | 4 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Azure Service Bus | share | Celery | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Software engineering | 2,031 | 65% | 816 | 80% | Celery |
| IT operations & business systems | 392 | 12% | 15 | 1% | Azure Service Bus |
| Data & AI | 237 | 8% | 108 | 11% | Celery |
| Engineering (non-software) | 78 | 2% | 8 | 1% | even |
| Product, program & project management | 42 | 1% | 4 | 0% | even |
| Sales | 13 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| General management & consulting | 7 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Customer service & success | 6 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Construction and civil | 5 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Marketing & communications | 3 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Unclassified | 3 | 0% | 2 | 0% | even |
| Design & UX | 2 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Human resources | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using Azure Service Bus →
Companies using Celery →
message brokers streaming ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
Celery is named by 353 companies in job postings and Azure Service Bus by 803; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/azure-service-bus-vs-celery)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
Azure Service Bus vs Celery: questions
Which is more used, Azure Service Bus or Celery?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, Azure Service Bus (803) over Celery (353). By website-and-DNS footprint, Celery (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses Azure Service Bus?
32% of Azure Service Bus companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 63% for Celery. 42% of Azure Service Bus companies have over 1,000 employees, against 19% for Celery.
Do companies run both?
0 companies name both in their postings, usually Azure Service Bus in marketing and Celery in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on Azure Service Bus or Celery. Start free, no card.