Biamp VS Zebra Technologies
As of 30 October 2026, Zebra Technologies is named by 152 companies and Biamp by 102; Biamp skews to companies under 200 people (44% vs 22%), Zebra Technologies to companies over 1,000 (53% vs 36%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Biamp's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Zebra Technologies rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- Biamp: 2–200 employees
- 44%
- Zebra Technologies: 2–200 employees
- 22%
- Biamp: 1,000+ employees
- 36%
- Zebra Technologies: 1,000+ employees
- 53%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 2.9 · 38.5
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | Biamp | share | Zebra Technologies | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-10 employees | 4 | 4% | 4 | 3% | even |
| 11-50 employees | 17 | 17% | 10 | 7% | Biamp |
| 51-200 employees | 24 | 24% | 20 | 13% | Biamp |
| 201-500 employees | 13 | 13% | 19 | 13% | even |
| 501-1000 employees | 7 | 7% | 17 | 11% | Zebra Technologies |
| 1001-5000 employees | 22 | 22% | 30 | 20% | even |
| 5001-10000 employees | 6 | 6% | 9 | 6% | even |
| 10,001+ employees | 9 | 9% | 41 | 27% | Zebra Technologies |
| Self-employed | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Biamp | share | Zebra Technologies | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology & software | 31 | 30% | 17 | 11% | Biamp |
| Property & construction | 25 | 25% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Consumer services & leisure | 19 | 19% | 2 | 1% | Biamp |
| Business & finance services | 9 | 9% | 6 | 4% | Biamp |
| Manufacturing & industry | 6 | 6% | 51 | 34% | Zebra Technologies |
| Commerce & trade | 3 | 3% | 36 | 24% | Zebra Technologies |
| Public, community & associations | 3 | 3% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Health care | 2 | 2% | 5 | 3% | even |
| Media & content | 2 | 2% | 6 | 4% | even |
| Automotive | 1 | 1% | 7 | 5% | Zebra Technologies |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 1 | 1% | 13 | 9% | Zebra Technologies |
| Utilities & infrastructure | – | – | 3 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Agriculture & forestry | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Biamp | share | Zebra Technologies | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 78 | 76% | 107 | 70% | Biamp |
| Canada | 6 | 6% | 10 | 7% | even |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 4% | 7 | 5% | even |
| Australia | 3 | 3% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Germany | 2 | 2% | 7 | 5% | Zebra Technologies |
| Italy | 2 | 2% | 2 | 1% | even |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | 1% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Belgium | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| India | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% | 5 | 3% | Zebra Technologies |
| Norway | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Sweden | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| AF | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Brazil | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Czechia | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Denmark | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Biamp | share | Zebra Technologies | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Skilled trades and field service | 107 | 27% | 11 | 0% | Biamp |
| Engineering (non-software) | 65 | 17% | 27 | 0% | Biamp |
| Arts media and entertainment | 46 | 12% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| IT operations & business systems | 30 | 8% | 139 | 2% | Biamp |
| Sales | 22 | 6% | 29 | 0% | Biamp |
| Customer service & success | 10 | 3% | 26 | 0% | Biamp |
| Product, program & project management | 8 | 2% | 15 | 0% | even |
| Construction and civil | 5 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Software engineering | 3 | 1% | 40 | 1% | even |
| Facilities cleaning and security | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Manufacturing and production | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Administration & office | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Logistics warehouse and transport | – | – | 741 | 12% | outside top 12 |
| Retail & store operations | – | – | 690 | 12% | outside top 12 |
| General management & consulting | – | – | 30 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Hospitality and food service | – | – | 21 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Data & AI | – | – | 10 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using Biamp →
Companies using Zebra Technologies →
end user devices peripherals ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
Zebra Technologies is named by 152 companies in job postings and Biamp by 102; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/biamp-vs-zebra-technologies)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
Biamp vs Zebra Technologies: questions
Which is more used, Biamp or Zebra Technologies?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, Zebra Technologies (152) over Biamp (102). By website-and-DNS footprint, Zebra Technologies (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses Biamp?
44% of Biamp companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 22% for Zebra Technologies. 36% of Biamp companies have over 1,000 employees, against 53% for Zebra Technologies.
Do companies run both?
0 companies name both in their postings, usually Biamp in marketing and Zebra Technologies in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on Biamp or Zebra Technologies. Start free, no card.