Breaknorm
Sign inStart free

Product

SignalsPeopleCompaniesLocal businessesMCP and API

Plays

Post engagersTeam build-outChampion movedHiring surgeNewly fundedLookalikesAll plays

Data

Coverage by countryHiring dataJob changesEmail verificationCompanies by toolWho is hiringMarket mapsOutboundCompany profilesCompare
PricingDatasetsDocsSign in
Compare · iot platforms protocols

Bluetooth Low Energy VS EtherCAT

As of 30 October 2026, EtherCAT is named by 278 companies and Bluetooth Low Energy by 359; Bluetooth Low Energy skews to companies under 200 people (51% vs 46%), EtherCAT to companies over 1,000 (31% vs 28%).

As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.

The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Bluetooth Low Energy's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, EtherCAT rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.

Bluetooth Low Energy: 2–200 employees
51%
EtherCAT: 2–200 employees
46%
Bluetooth Low Energy: 1,000+ employees
28%
EtherCAT: 1,000+ employees
31%
Postings per company, 90 days
2.2 · 2.7
Website or DNS footprint
0 · 0
359companies name Bluetooth Low Energy
278companies name EtherCAT
0name both
787 · 758postings in 90 days, Bluetooth Low Energy · EtherCAT
02Side by side

Who chooses which

Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.

By company size
SegmentBluetooth Low EnergyshareEtherCATshareLeans
Self-employed72%52%even
2-10 employees247%228%even
11-50 employees6919%4416%Bluetooth Low Energy
51-200 employees8925%6323%Bluetooth Low Energy
201-500 employees4412%4115%EtherCAT
501-1000 employees257%166%even
1001-5000 employees3811%3513%EtherCAT
5001-10000 employees216%135%even
10,001+ employees4212%3914%EtherCAT
By industry
SegmentBluetooth Low EnergyshareEtherCATshareLeans
Technology & software13337%218%Bluetooth Low Energy
Manufacturing & industry11733%17964%EtherCAT
Business & finance services339%228%even
Commerce & trade195%73%Bluetooth Low Energy
Consumer services & leisure113%62%even
Automotive82%83%even
Media & content82%31%even
Property & construction82%52%even
Health care72%41%even
Utilities & infrastructure62%135%EtherCAT
Public, community & associations51%41%even
Transport, logistics & rental21%41%even
By country
SegmentBluetooth Low EnergyshareEtherCATshareLeans
United States18752%14251%even
United Kingdom247%124%Bluetooth Low Energy
Germany236%4717%EtherCAT
India175%41%Bluetooth Low Energy
France123%83%even
Canada113%52%even
Poland103%––outside top 12
Switzerland82%––outside top 12
Australia72%––outside top 12
Sweden62%52%even
Netherlands51%62%even
Singapore51%41%even
Spain––73%outside top 12
Austria––52%outside top 12
Italy––52%outside top 12
Postings by team (share of each tool's postings)
SegmentBluetooth Low EnergyshareEtherCATshareLeans
Software engineering69864%23123%Bluetooth Low Energy
Engineering (non-software)19017%55555%EtherCAT
IT operations & business systems383%162%even
Product, program & project management303%71%Bluetooth Low Energy
Sales222%182%even
Marketing & communications81%30%even
Unclassified50%––outside top 12
Data & AI30%141%even
Quality, safety & environment30%91%even
Research and science20%30%even
Skilled trades and field service20%394%EtherCAT
Arts media and entertainment10%––outside top 12
Customer service & success––91%outside top 12
Logistics warehouse and transport––30%outside top 12
Cite this

Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.

EtherCAT is named by 278 companies in job postings and Bluetooth Low Energy by 359; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/bluetooth-low-energy-vs-ethercat)
How we know

Read from the source, not self-reported

Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →

  • Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
  • Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
  • SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
  • Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
FAQ

Bluetooth Low Energy vs EtherCAT: questions

Which is more used, Bluetooth Low Energy or EtherCAT?

By companies naming it in their own job postings, Bluetooth Low Energy (359) over EtherCAT (278). By website-and-DNS footprint, EtherCAT (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.

Who chooses Bluetooth Low Energy?

51% of Bluetooth Low Energy companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 46% for EtherCAT. 28% of Bluetooth Low Energy companies have over 1,000 employees, against 31% for EtherCAT.

Do companies run both?

0 companies name both in their postings, usually Bluetooth Low Energy in marketing and EtherCAT in sales, or during a migration.

Where do these numbers come from?

From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.

Companies and people

Get either list your way

The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.

Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it

Filter on Bluetooth Low Energy or EtherCAT. Start free, no card.

  1. 01Sign up, no card
  2. 02Connect Claude, ChatGPT or an API key
  3. 03Ask for your market