Breaknorm
Sign inStart free

Product

SignalsPeopleCompaniesLocal businessesMCP and API

Plays

Post engagersTeam build-outChampion movedHiring surgeNewly fundedLookalikesAll plays

Data

Coverage by countryHiring dataJob changesEmail verificationCompanies by toolWho is hiringMarket mapsOutboundCompany profilesCompare
PricingDatasetsDocsSign in
Compare · iot platforms protocols

Bluetooth Low Energy VS LIN Bus

As of 30 October 2026, LIN Bus is named by 212 companies and Bluetooth Low Energy by 359; Bluetooth Low Energy skews to companies under 200 people (51% vs 39%), LIN Bus to companies over 1,000 (42% vs 28%).

As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.

The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Bluetooth Low Energy's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, LIN Bus rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.

Bluetooth Low Energy: 2–200 employees
51%
LIN Bus: 2–200 employees
39%
Bluetooth Low Energy: 1,000+ employees
28%
LIN Bus: 1,000+ employees
42%
Postings per company, 90 days
2.2 · 4.8
Website or DNS footprint
0 · 0
359companies name Bluetooth Low Energy
212companies name LIN Bus
18name both
787 · 1,014postings in 90 days, Bluetooth Low Energy · LIN Bus
02Side by side

Who chooses which

Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.

By company size
SegmentBluetooth Low EnergyshareLIN BusshareLeans
Self-employed72%10%even
2-10 employees247%188%even
11-50 employees6919%2612%Bluetooth Low Energy
51-200 employees8925%3918%Bluetooth Low Energy
201-500 employees4412%2411%even
501-1000 employees257%168%even
1001-5000 employees3811%3014%LIN Bus
5001-10000 employees216%136%even
10,001+ employees4212%4521%LIN Bus
By industry
SegmentBluetooth Low EnergyshareLIN BusshareLeans
Technology & software13337%4521%Bluetooth Low Energy
Manufacturing & industry11733%5827%Bluetooth Low Energy
Business & finance services339%3316%LIN Bus
Commerce & trade195%10%Bluetooth Low Energy
Consumer services & leisure113%73%even
Automotive82%5626%LIN Bus
Media & content82%42%even
Property & construction82%––outside top 12
Health care72%––outside top 12
Utilities & infrastructure62%10%even
Public, community & associations51%10%even
Transport, logistics & rental21%63%LIN Bus
By country
SegmentBluetooth Low EnergyshareLIN BusshareLeans
United States18752%9947%Bluetooth Low Energy
United Kingdom247%105%even
Germany236%3818%LIN Bus
India175%105%even
France123%94%even
Canada113%42%even
Poland103%42%even
Switzerland82%––outside top 12
Australia72%––outside top 12
Sweden62%147%LIN Bus
Netherlands51%––outside top 12
Singapore51%––outside top 12
Spain––31%outside top 12
United Arab Emirates––21%outside top 12
Brazil––21%outside top 12
Finland––21%outside top 12
Postings by team (share of each tool's postings)
SegmentBluetooth Low EnergyshareLIN BusshareLeans
Software engineering69864%45032%Bluetooth Low Energy
Engineering (non-software)19017%49935%LIN Bus
IT operations & business systems383%363%even
Product, program & project management303%141%even
Sales222%91%even
Marketing & communications81%––outside top 12
Unclassified50%––outside top 12
Data & AI30%40%even
Quality, safety & environment30%312%even
Research and science20%––outside top 12
Skilled trades and field service20%574%LIN Bus
Arts media and entertainment10%––outside top 12
Customer service & success––40%outside top 12
Logistics warehouse and transport––40%outside top 12
Construction and civil––20%outside top 12
Education & training––20%outside top 12
Cite this

Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.

LIN Bus is named by 212 companies in job postings and Bluetooth Low Energy by 359; 18 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/bluetooth-low-energy-vs-lin-bus)
How we know

Read from the source, not self-reported

Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →

  • Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
  • Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
  • SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
  • Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
FAQ

Bluetooth Low Energy vs LIN Bus: questions

Which is more used, Bluetooth Low Energy or LIN Bus?

By companies naming it in their own job postings, Bluetooth Low Energy (359) over LIN Bus (212). By website-and-DNS footprint, LIN Bus (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.

Who chooses Bluetooth Low Energy?

51% of Bluetooth Low Energy companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 39% for LIN Bus. 28% of Bluetooth Low Energy companies have over 1,000 employees, against 42% for LIN Bus.

Do companies run both?

18 companies name both in their postings, usually Bluetooth Low Energy in marketing and LIN Bus in sales, or during a migration.

Where do these numbers come from?

From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.

Companies and people

Get either list your way

The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.

Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it

Filter on Bluetooth Low Energy or LIN Bus. Start free, no card.

  1. 01Sign up, no card
  2. 02Connect Claude, ChatGPT or an API key
  3. 03Ask for your market