Breaknorm
Sign inStart free

Product

SignalsPeopleCompaniesLocal businessesMCP and API

Plays

Post engagersTeam build-outChampion movedHiring surgeNewly fundedLookalikesAll plays

Data

Coverage by countryHiring dataJob changesEmail verificationCompanies by toolWho is hiringMarket mapsOutboundCompany profilesCompare
PricingDatasetsDocsSign in
Compare · iot platforms protocols

Bluetooth Low Energy VS MQTT

As of 30 October 2026, MQTT is named by 917 companies and Bluetooth Low Energy by 359; Bluetooth Low Energy skews to companies under 200 people (51% vs 46%), MQTT to companies over 1,000 (32% vs 28%).

As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.

The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Bluetooth Low Energy's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, MQTT rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.

Bluetooth Low Energy: 2–200 employees
51%
MQTT: 2–200 employees
46%
Bluetooth Low Energy: 1,000+ employees
28%
MQTT: 1,000+ employees
32%
Postings per company, 90 days
2.2 · 2.5
Website or DNS footprint
0 · 0
359companies name Bluetooth Low Energy
917companies name MQTT
125name both
787 · 2,265postings in 90 days, Bluetooth Low Energy · MQTT
02Side by side

Who chooses which

Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.

By company size
SegmentBluetooth Low EnergyshareMQTTshareLeans
Self-employed72%61%even
2-10 employees247%829%MQTT
11-50 employees6919%15317%Bluetooth Low Energy
51-200 employees8925%18720%Bluetooth Low Energy
201-500 employees4412%12013%even
501-1000 employees257%748%even
1001-5000 employees3811%11312%even
5001-10000 employees216%536%even
10,001+ employees4212%12914%MQTT
By industry
SegmentBluetooth Low EnergyshareMQTTshareLeans
Technology & software13337%27130%Bluetooth Low Energy
Manufacturing & industry11733%32836%MQTT
Business & finance services339%819%even
Commerce & trade195%374%even
Consumer services & leisure113%162%even
Automotive82%374%even
Media & content82%111%even
Property & construction82%404%MQTT
Health care72%––outside top 12
Utilities & infrastructure62%526%MQTT
Public, community & associations51%192%even
Transport, logistics & rental21%142%even
Agriculture & forestry––51%outside top 12
By country
SegmentBluetooth Low EnergyshareMQTTshareLeans
United States18752%45349%Bluetooth Low Energy
United Kingdom247%536%even
Germany236%10511%MQTT
India175%283%even
France123%253%even
Canada113%334%even
Poland103%202%even
Switzerland82%––outside top 12
Australia72%––outside top 12
Sweden62%243%even
Netherlands51%131%even
Singapore51%––outside top 12
Spain––202%outside top 12
Belgium––162%outside top 12
Italy––162%outside top 12
Postings by team (share of each tool's postings)
SegmentBluetooth Low EnergyshareMQTTshareLeans
Software engineering69864%1,30844%Bluetooth Low Energy
Engineering (non-software)19017%47916%even
IT operations & business systems383%1756%MQTT
Product, program & project management303%652%even
Sales222%813%even
Marketing & communications81%70%even
Unclassified50%––outside top 12
Data & AI30%1174%MQTT
Quality, safety & environment30%191%even
Research and science20%––outside top 12
Skilled trades and field service20%813%MQTT
Arts media and entertainment10%––outside top 12
Customer service & success––161%outside top 12
General management & consulting––120%outside top 12
Education & training––60%outside top 12
Cite this

Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.

MQTT is named by 917 companies in job postings and Bluetooth Low Energy by 359; 125 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/bluetooth-low-energy-vs-mqtt)
How we know

Read from the source, not self-reported

Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →

  • Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
  • Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
  • SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
  • Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
FAQ

Bluetooth Low Energy vs MQTT: questions

Which is more used, Bluetooth Low Energy or MQTT?

By companies naming it in their own job postings, MQTT (917) over Bluetooth Low Energy (359). By website-and-DNS footprint, MQTT (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.

Who chooses Bluetooth Low Energy?

51% of Bluetooth Low Energy companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 46% for MQTT. 28% of Bluetooth Low Energy companies have over 1,000 employees, against 32% for MQTT.

Do companies run both?

125 companies name both in their postings, usually Bluetooth Low Energy in marketing and MQTT in sales, or during a migration.

Where do these numbers come from?

From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.

Companies and people

Get either list your way

The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.

Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it

Filter on Bluetooth Low Energy or MQTT. Start free, no card.

  1. 01Sign up, no card
  2. 02Connect Claude, ChatGPT or an API key
  3. 03Ask for your market