BMD VS MIP Fund Accounting
As of 30 October 2026, MIP Fund Accounting is named by 114 companies and BMD by 100; BMD skews to companies under 200 people (72% vs 56%), MIP Fund Accounting to companies over 1,000 (19% vs 11%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: BMD's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, MIP Fund Accounting rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- BMD: 2–200 employees
- 72%
- MIP Fund Accounting: 2–200 employees
- 56%
- BMD: 1,000+ employees
- 11%
- MIP Fund Accounting: 1,000+ employees
- 19%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 1.5 · 1.7
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 282
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | BMD | share | MIP Fund Accounting | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 1 | 1% | 1 | 1% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 21 | 21% | 10 | 9% | BMD |
| 11-50 employees | 23 | 23% | 15 | 13% | BMD |
| 51-200 employees | 28 | 28% | 39 | 34% | MIP Fund Accounting |
| 201-500 employees | 14 | 14% | 19 | 17% | MIP Fund Accounting |
| 501-1000 employees | 2 | 2% | 8 | 7% | MIP Fund Accounting |
| 1001-5000 employees | 6 | 6% | 11 | 10% | MIP Fund Accounting |
| 5001-10000 employees | 2 | 2% | 2 | 2% | even |
| 10,001+ employees | 3 | 3% | 9 | 8% | MIP Fund Accounting |
| Segment | BMD | share | MIP Fund Accounting | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business & finance services | 31 | 31% | 17 | 15% | BMD |
| Manufacturing & industry | 19 | 19% | 8 | 7% | BMD |
| Technology & software | 12 | 12% | 14 | 12% | even |
| Health care | 8 | 8% | 19 | 17% | MIP Fund Accounting |
| Property & construction | 8 | 8% | 2 | 2% | BMD |
| Public, community & associations | 5 | 5% | 41 | 36% | MIP Fund Accounting |
| Media & content | 5 | 5% | 2 | 2% | BMD |
| Commerce & trade | 3 | 3% | 2 | 2% | even |
| Hospitality & travel | 3 | 3% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 2 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 2 | 2% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Automotive | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Consumer services & leisure | – | – | 7 | 6% | outside top 12 |
| Agriculture & forestry | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | BMD | share | MIP Fund Accounting | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Austria | 76 | 76% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| United States | 14 | 14% | 99 | 87% | MIP Fund Accounting |
| Germany | 6 | 6% | 3 | 3% | BMD |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% | 3 | 3% | even |
| Canada | 1 | 1% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Hungary | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Spain | – | – | 2 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| France | – | – | 2 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Sweden | – | – | 2 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| United Arab Emirates | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | BMD | share | MIP Fund Accounting | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Finance & accounting | 121 | 55% | 127 | 47% | BMD |
| Administration & office | 15 | 7% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| IT operations & business systems | 9 | 4% | 40 | 15% | MIP Fund Accounting |
| Real estate and property | 4 | 2% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Sales | 4 | 2% | 3 | 1% | even |
| Engineering (non-software) | 3 | 1% | 6 | 2% | even |
| General management & consulting | 3 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Healthcare clinical | 3 | 1% | 9 | 3% | even |
| Human resources | 3 | 1% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Product, program & project management | 3 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Construction and civil | 2 | 1% | 4 | 1% | even |
| Legal, compliance & risk | 2 | 1% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Data & AI | – | – | 23 | 8% | outside top 12 |
| Software engineering | – | – | 13 | 5% | outside top 12 |
| Logistics warehouse and transport | – | – | 3 | 1% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using BMD →
Companies using MIP Fund Accounting →
accounting software ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
MIP Fund Accounting is named by 114 companies in job postings and BMD by 100; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/bmd-vs-mip-fund-accounting)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
BMD vs MIP Fund Accounting: questions
Which is more used, BMD or MIP Fund Accounting?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, MIP Fund Accounting (114) over BMD (100). By website-and-DNS footprint, MIP Fund Accounting (282 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses BMD?
72% of BMD companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 56% for MIP Fund Accounting. 11% of BMD companies have over 1,000 employees, against 19% for MIP Fund Accounting.
Do companies run both?
0 companies name both in their postings, usually BMD in marketing and MIP Fund Accounting in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on BMD or MIP Fund Accounting. Start free, no card.