Breaknorm
Sign inStart free

Product

SignalsPeopleCompaniesLocal businessesMCP and API

Plays

Post engagersTeam build-outChampion movedHiring surgeNewly fundedLookalikesAll plays

Data

Coverage by countryHiring dataJob changesEmail verificationCompanies by toolWho is hiringMarket mapsOutboundCompany profilesCompare
PricingDatasetsDocsSign in
Compare · plc programming

B&R Automation VS Structured Text

As of 30 October 2026, Structured Text is named by 206 companies and B&R Automation by 120; B&R Automation skews to companies under 200 people (38% vs 38%), Structured Text to companies over 1,000 (36% vs 42%).

As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.

The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: B&R Automation's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Structured Text rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.

B&R Automation: 2–200 employees
38%
Structured Text: 2–200 employees
38%
B&R Automation: 1,000+ employees
42%
Structured Text: 1,000+ employees
36%
Postings per company, 90 days
1.8 · 1.9
Website or DNS footprint
0 · 0
120companies name B&R Automation
206companies name Structured Text
19name both
221 · 392postings in 90 days, B&R Automation · Structured Text
02Side by side

Who chooses which

Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.

By company size
SegmentB&R AutomationshareStructured TextshareLeans
2-10 employees65%126%even
11-50 employees1412%3115%Structured Text
51-200 employees2622%3617%B&R Automation
201-500 employees1311%3015%Structured Text
501-1000 employees119%2010%even
1001-5000 employees2218%3417%even
5001-10000 employees76%126%even
10,001+ employees2118%2914%B&R Automation
Self-employed––21%outside top 12
By industry
SegmentB&R AutomationshareStructured TextshareLeans
Manufacturing & industry8470%12259%B&R Automation
Business & finance services76%136%even
Commerce & trade54%73%even
Property & construction54%94%even
Technology & software54%136%Structured Text
Utilities & infrastructure54%136%Structured Text
Media & content43%––outside top 12
Automotive22%157%Structured Text
Health care22%31%even
Public, community & associations11%52%even
Transport, logistics & rental––31%outside top 12
Consumer services & leisure––21%outside top 12
Agriculture & forestry––10%outside top 12
By country
SegmentB&R AutomationshareStructured TextshareLeans
United States4134%11958%Structured Text
Germany2924%2110%B&R Automation
Austria87%––outside top 12
Italy87%63%B&R Automation
United Kingdom65%73%even
Poland65%––outside top 12
Switzerland54%21%B&R Automation
France43%73%even
Netherlands43%73%even
Canada33%105%Structured Text
India22%––outside top 12
Australia11%21%even
Denmark––31%outside top 12
Norway––31%outside top 12
Bulgaria––21%outside top 12
Postings by team (share of each tool's postings)
SegmentB&R AutomationshareStructured TextshareLeans
Engineering (non-software)13244%33868%Structured Text
Skilled trades and field service7324%296%B&R Automation
Software engineering3311%7315%Structured Text
Finance & accounting103%––outside top 12
IT operations & business systems62%41%even
Sales41%41%even
Quality, safety & environment31%31%even
Data & AI10%10%even
Manufacturing and production10%10%even
Product, program & project management10%10%even
Construction and civil––10%outside top 12
Customer service & success––10%outside top 12
Cite this

Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.

Structured Text is named by 206 companies in job postings and B&R Automation by 120; 19 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/br-automation-vs-structured-text)
How we know

Read from the source, not self-reported

Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →

  • Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
  • Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
  • SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
  • Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
FAQ

B&R Automation vs Structured Text: questions

Which is more used, B&R Automation or Structured Text?

By companies naming it in their own job postings, Structured Text (206) over B&R Automation (120). By website-and-DNS footprint, Structured Text (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.

Who chooses B&R Automation?

38% of B&R Automation companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 38% for Structured Text. 42% of B&R Automation companies have over 1,000 employees, against 36% for Structured Text.

Do companies run both?

19 companies name both in their postings, usually B&R Automation in marketing and Structured Text in sales, or during a migration.

Where do these numbers come from?

From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.

Companies and people

Get either list your way

The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.

Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it

Filter on B&R Automation or Structured Text. Start free, no card.

  1. 01Sign up, no card
  2. 02Connect Claude, ChatGPT or an API key
  3. 03Ask for your market