Cadence Design Systems VS Siemens EDA
As of 30 October 2026, Siemens EDA is named by 139 companies and Cadence Design Systems by 683; Cadence Design Systems skews to companies under 200 people (42% vs 35%), Siemens EDA to companies over 1,000 (42% vs 37%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Cadence Design Systems's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Siemens EDA rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- Cadence Design Systems: 2–200 employees
- 42%
- Siemens EDA: 2–200 employees
- 35%
- Cadence Design Systems: 1,000+ employees
- 37%
- Siemens EDA: 1,000+ employees
- 42%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 5.1 · 6.2
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | Cadence Design Systems | share | Siemens EDA | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 7 | 1% | 2 | 1% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 75 | 11% | 10 | 7% | Cadence Design Systems |
| 11-50 employees | 92 | 13% | 20 | 14% | even |
| 51-200 employees | 123 | 18% | 19 | 14% | Cadence Design Systems |
| 201-500 employees | 73 | 11% | 19 | 14% | Siemens EDA |
| 501-1000 employees | 63 | 9% | 10 | 7% | Cadence Design Systems |
| 1001-5000 employees | 104 | 15% | 23 | 17% | even |
| 5001-10000 employees | 36 | 5% | 8 | 6% | even |
| 10,001+ employees | 110 | 16% | 28 | 20% | Siemens EDA |
| Segment | Cadence Design Systems | share | Siemens EDA | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturing & industry | 266 | 39% | 84 | 60% | Siemens EDA |
| Technology & software | 158 | 23% | 17 | 12% | Cadence Design Systems |
| Business & finance services | 94 | 14% | 21 | 15% | even |
| Health care | 72 | 11% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Consumer services & leisure | 22 | 3% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Public, community & associations | 15 | 2% | 3 | 2% | even |
| Automotive | 12 | 2% | 5 | 4% | even |
| Media & content | 12 | 2% | 3 | 2% | even |
| Commerce & trade | 10 | 1% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 10 | 1% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Property & construction | 8 | 1% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 3 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Cadence Design Systems | share | Siemens EDA | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 494 | 72% | 89 | 64% | Cadence Design Systems |
| United Kingdom | 31 | 5% | 6 | 4% | even |
| Germany | 28 | 4% | 9 | 6% | Siemens EDA |
| France | 21 | 3% | 8 | 6% | Siemens EDA |
| India | 19 | 3% | 7 | 5% | Siemens EDA |
| Canada | 14 | 2% | 3 | 2% | even |
| Singapore | 8 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Netherlands | 7 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Sweden | 5 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Austria | 4 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Switzerland | 4 | 1% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Spain | 4 | 1% | 1 | 1% | even |
| United Arab Emirates | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Belgium | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Czechia | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Finland | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Cadence Design Systems | share | Siemens EDA | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Engineering (non-software) | 2,914 | 64% | 873 | 83% | Siemens EDA |
| IT operations & business systems | 188 | 4% | 7 | 1% | Cadence Design Systems |
| Software engineering | 182 | 4% | 38 | 4% | even |
| Social care and community | 110 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Administration & office | 83 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Sales | 82 | 2% | 19 | 2% | even |
| Product, program & project management | 81 | 2% | 5 | 0% | even |
| Unclassified | 71 | 2% | 2 | 0% | even |
| General management & consulting | 40 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Data & AI | 28 | 1% | 13 | 1% | even |
| Business development & strategy | 27 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Finance & accounting | 26 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Design & UX | – | – | 6 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Arts media and entertainment | – | – | 3 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Customer service & success | – | – | 2 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Education & training | – | – | 2 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Skilled trades and field service | – | – | 2 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using Cadence Design Systems →
Companies using Siemens EDA →
semiconductor eda ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
Siemens EDA is named by 139 companies in job postings and Cadence Design Systems by 683; 113 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/cadence-design-systems-vs-siemens-eda)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
Cadence Design Systems vs Siemens EDA: questions
Which is more used, Cadence Design Systems or Siemens EDA?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, Cadence Design Systems (683) over Siemens EDA (139). By website-and-DNS footprint, Siemens EDA (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses Cadence Design Systems?
42% of Cadence Design Systems companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 35% for Siemens EDA. 37% of Cadence Design Systems companies have over 1,000 employees, against 42% for Siemens EDA.
Do companies run both?
113 companies name both in their postings, usually Cadence Design Systems in marketing and Siemens EDA in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on Cadence Design Systems or Siemens EDA. Start free, no card.