Cadence Virtuoso VS ModelSim
As of 30 October 2026, ModelSim is named by 118 companies and Cadence Virtuoso by 146; Cadence Virtuoso skews to companies under 200 people (47% vs 42%), ModelSim to companies over 1,000 (36% vs 38%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Cadence Virtuoso's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, ModelSim rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- Cadence Virtuoso: 2–200 employees
- 47%
- ModelSim: 2–200 employees
- 42%
- Cadence Virtuoso: 1,000+ employees
- 38%
- ModelSim: 1,000+ employees
- 36%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 8.1 · 3.6
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | Cadence Virtuoso | share | ModelSim | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| 2-10 employees | 20 | 14% | 8 | 7% | Cadence Virtuoso |
| 11-50 employees | 28 | 19% | 18 | 15% | Cadence Virtuoso |
| 51-200 employees | 20 | 14% | 24 | 20% | ModelSim |
| 201-500 employees | 16 | 11% | 15 | 13% | even |
| 501-1000 employees | 6 | 4% | 10 | 8% | ModelSim |
| 1001-5000 employees | 21 | 14% | 16 | 14% | even |
| 5001-10000 employees | 8 | 5% | 6 | 5% | even |
| 10,001+ employees | 26 | 18% | 21 | 18% | even |
| Segment | Cadence Virtuoso | share | ModelSim | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturing & industry | 84 | 58% | 60 | 51% | Cadence Virtuoso |
| Technology & software | 28 | 19% | 23 | 19% | even |
| Business & finance services | 11 | 8% | 19 | 16% | ModelSim |
| Hospitality & travel | 6 | 4% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Public, community & associations | 4 | 3% | 2 | 2% | even |
| Consumer services & leisure | 4 | 3% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Media & content | 3 | 2% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 3 | 2% | 9 | 8% | ModelSim |
| Health care | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Property & construction | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 1 | 1% | 2 | 2% | even |
| Automotive | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Commerce & trade | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Cadence Virtuoso | share | ModelSim | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 96 | 66% | 69 | 58% | Cadence Virtuoso |
| United Kingdom | 11 | 8% | 10 | 8% | even |
| Germany | 7 | 5% | 8 | 7% | even |
| Singapore | 5 | 3% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| France | 4 | 3% | 6 | 5% | ModelSim |
| India | 4 | 3% | 5 | 4% | even |
| Austria | 3 | 2% | 2 | 2% | even |
| Spain | 3 | 2% | 2 | 2% | even |
| Netherlands | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Canada | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| China | 1 | 1% | 3 | 3% | even |
| Poland | – | – | 2 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Sweden | – | – | 2 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| United Arab Emirates | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Belgium | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Cadence Virtuoso | share | ModelSim | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Engineering (non-software) | 1,156 | 80% | 409 | 78% | even |
| Software engineering | 28 | 2% | 59 | 11% | ModelSim |
| Sales | 21 | 1% | 9 | 2% | even |
| Design & UX | 18 | 1% | 2 | 0% | even |
| Data & AI | 13 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| IT operations & business systems | 10 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Quality, safety & environment | 9 | 1% | 2 | 0% | even |
| Hospitality and food service | 5 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Product, program & project management | 5 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Travel, leisure & events | 5 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Research and science | 4 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Unclassified | 4 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Manufacturing and production | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using Cadence Virtuoso →
Companies using ModelSim →
semiconductor eda ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
ModelSim is named by 118 companies in job postings and Cadence Virtuoso by 146; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/cadence-virtuoso-vs-modelsim)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
Cadence Virtuoso vs ModelSim: questions
Which is more used, Cadence Virtuoso or ModelSim?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, Cadence Virtuoso (146) over ModelSim (118). By website-and-DNS footprint, ModelSim (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses Cadence Virtuoso?
47% of Cadence Virtuoso companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 42% for ModelSim. 38% of Cadence Virtuoso companies have over 1,000 employees, against 36% for ModelSim.
Do companies run both?
0 companies name both in their postings, usually Cadence Virtuoso in marketing and ModelSim in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on Cadence Virtuoso or ModelSim. Start free, no card.